3,022 karma · joined March 7, 2012
A technologist, founder, and current Googler, I've repeatedly taken products from inception to commercial success across sectors, from startups to Fortune 10 companies. My specialty lies in bridging the gap between business vision and technical execution, deeply engaging with code and who mentors teams. Beyond engineering, I bring a global perspective from living abroad for nine years and speaking fluent French.
Get in touch with me: --------------------- @jlyman j @ joshualyman.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/joshualyman
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/jlyman; my proof: https://keybase.io/jlyman/sigs/c1xpV7dq3vEGU8gVObbZqSDE1_-E5t97Gl7HCQ98ebk ]
A search that then results in another search (22%) could either be the user realizing their terms weren't getting them to the right direction so they modify the search, or just changing their mind. The article notes that more research is needed here. Doesn't seem like they are "not going to the open web."
That leaves the biggest bucket (42%) where 79% go to a website, 29% go to a Google property, and 1% go to a paid click destination. The 79% is of course considered the "open web" here, but presenting Google properties as not the open web seems funny. There's no walled garden, login, or payment required to access those destinations, and they're usually presented in search results because of their relevance to the search. Even the 1% paid clicks bucket, while they are ads, technically still go to the open web.
So in general I feel like this is trying to paint a negative picture that the data doesn't really support. If nothing else, the definition of "open web" here feels overly selective, to the detriment of the message. But this is the Internet, so I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that the headline is clickbaity. :)
> At the present time, based on available information, WHO assesses the overall public health risk posed by A(H5N1) to be low, and for those with exposure to infected birds or animals or contaminated environments, the risk of infection is considered low-to-moderate. This risk requires close monitoring and WHO and partners will continue to regularly assess and publish public health risk assessments for avian influenza.
> "He was the first person to understand that security problems are often actually economic problems."
I had a wise, old professor in college who taught us, almost as a side comment, that every technology and business problem was actually a people problem under the covers. If you could deal with the underlying human problem, you'd often take care of most, if not all, of the superficial tech/business problem. I think this and Ross's viewpoints are a very important principle.
I'd also throw out there that one can derive a lot of purpose and meaning in life from religion as well. I certainly do. There are many motivating factors in life, and some core religious beliefs can do this quite effectively, in a positive manner.
It doesn’t discuss seeing it during the day, but it was visible in places where it would never otherwise be.
Surely things have gotten faster and (in some cases!) more efficient, but we are doing the same thing 30 years later that we were excited about in 1993. In a way that’s both comforting and darkly funny.
Quick 8-minute documentary on it that I found interesting: https://youtu.be/p_iZr2-Coqc?si=kthsdehqzJlvDfkg
https://petapixel.com/2023/06/12/sphere-studios-big-sky-cine...
Bits like a fiber-to-media recording system and custom GPU-based processing systems, really awesome project
Documentation, even good docs, usually only answer the question “What does this method/class/general idea do?” Really good docs will come with some examples of connecting A and B. But they will often not include examples of connecting A to E when you have to transform via P because of business requirements, and almost never tell you how to incorporate third-party libraries X, Y, and Z.
As an engineer, I can read the docs and figure out the bits, but having an LLM suggest some of the intermediary or glue steps, even if wrong sometimes, is a benefit I don’t get only from good documentation.
Support has always been very responsive in my experience. I'd try them first.
Are they selling the loans off their books to third parties? Or are they just refusing to make new loans that they would have otherwise consistently made?
Electricity is a commodity to be managed like all others, and during times of extreme cold this is good management. I think it’s easy to bash grid operators (I know, I live in Texas!) but this seems like proper operating procedure here.
Having lived in Mexico City myself and returning there a few times a year right now, this is definitely a pretty accurate representation of many of the sounds you'll see/hear (with the exception that the folks playing the sounds aren't always as smiley as the way the cutesy art makes them look). A fun way to learn about another culture though.
It takes a couple of months to 1) get your head wrapped around the core concepts and 2) get budgets and its automatic matching working well, but after that it provides an amazingly good lens into your funds.
Accountability has gone up for me and my wife, and it’s helped us make decisions that, while sometimes hard, actually made an impact. Confidence in our true financial position has also increased.
- Germany: https://www.familysearch.org/en/wiki/Germany_Genealogy
- Ukraine: https://www.familysearch.org/en/wiki/Ukraine_Genealogy
- Russia: https://www.familysearch.org/en/wiki/Russia_Genealogy
Also see the main wiki page, which has a Locality finder and may have other links depending on how far back you want to go (e.g., German Empire): https://www.familysearch.org/en/wiki/Main_Page
And of course, search the entire FamilySearch database too, which aggregates many, many sources: https://www.familysearch.org/search/