What a major solar storm could do
newyorker.com
newyorker.com
Nice flex.
- Donate some money to the Planetary Defence Team? Yes, that’s a real thing. We can donate to Nasa and ask that this be earmarked for that team. Also, try to help cool things down with North Korea in case they get nervous?
- North Ko… I thought by “aliens” you meant creatures from outer space!?
- Space, yes, but if something detonates on that orbit, we lose capacity. Whether that’s an alternative life form or an alternative form of government.
For those who don't know, capital expenditures that are funded out of a rate case make investor-owned utilities money. If you can get the relevant regulatory body (often a public utility commission) to approve raising rates to cover x dollars of grid resilience projects, the utilities will happily take the money and go forth and implement.
The trick is justifying the spend to said regulators. This is hard with black swan events and regulators that are explicitly tasked with being ratepayer advocates, guarding against the utilities unnecessarily gold-plating things to get a greater rate of return for their investors. It's not like the utilities don't want the money, or the "work" of doing it, or anything like that. Rather, if PG&E went to CPUC and asked for several billion dollars to build a hardened bunker filled with things like transformers that may never be used in the lifetime of the people signing the documents (but the profits realized by the rate of return on the CAPEX will immediately go to investors), they'll likely get laughed out of the room. This issue complicates the discussion about grid resilience, because it can seem to Jeff & Jane Ratepayer (/taxpayer if we're talking national projects) it's all just an excuse to route regular people's money to executives & investors over something that won't happen, the rich get richer, yadda yadda yadda.
(In other words, is paying for this with higher taxes substantially better compared to paying for this with higher utility bills?)
First, income and electricity usage are already correlated for most residential customers -- in general wealthier individuals use more electricity and therefore pay more under either approach. More importantly, making taxpayers subsidize very-high-electricity consuming businesses and manufacturing seems unfair and regressive. (For example, an aluminum smelter may use as much electricity as a large residential neighborhood but pay lower net taxes than that neighborhood.) Third, paying for the actual cost of electricity helps incentivize energy efficiency which incentivizes energy efficiency and has environmental benefits. Finally, if your goal is to prevent rate increases from burdening low-income households then using taxpayer funds to bolster targeted subsidies such as LIHEAP seems like a more direct and cost-effective approach.
> (almost) everyone in the nation should share the cost, not just the customers of a specific utility in a specific geographic area
Why? If we make it easy for utility executives to ask for handouts and grants then who among them would bother with the comparatively harder task of convincing local customers to pay the true costs of producing the service they are using? More generally, asking everyone to collectively subsidize organizations or regions that make poor, short-sighted decisions is a moral hazard that shields utilities from consequences and discourages them from planning responsibly. Sure, a government may need to be prepared to step in to take over a failing utility but that seems like it ought to be a last resort in emergencies, not a standard way of funding predictable business costs.
Meanwhile, here's the PJM plan for geomagnetic disturbances.[1] Start at page 37. It's a very real problem, but the people in the control rooms know what to do. The basic effect is that certain specific transformers overheat. This is now monitored.
Most recent event:
104095 Warning Geomagnetic Disturbance Warning 12.01.2023 06:55 PJM-RTO
A Geomagnetic Disturbance Warning has been issued
for 06:55 on 12.01.2023 through 16:00 on 12.01.2023.
A GMD warning of K7 or greater is in effect for this period.
Additional Comments: End time extended to 1600 EST
This never got to the point that action had to be taken.Looking at documents from NERC and the various ISOs, I get the impression that PJM is serious about this, but there's a lot of hand-waving from everybody else.
It only affects very long wires with a voltage to ground. Most long-haul is fiber now, which is totally indifferent to this effect. Balanced or twisted pair, no problem. Electric railways, maybe.
[1] https://www.pjm.com/-/media/training/nerc-certifications/tra...
If interested in this topic, the Resilient Navigation and Timing Foundation is worth following (RSS/Atom) for articles and developments in the space:
This has piqued my curiosity. What stuff is this? If something needs to know where it is and it's not going to move, can't someone just program its location once and be done with it?
As I understand, no one without a physical bikeshare rental card can check out a bike if GPS went down. Lots of apps that try to control user behavior and get access to permissions are probably similar
As an example, consider the blinking lights on top of wind turbines and other tall things. If you've got a lot of these in one area, the FAA recommends they blink in unison, to make them more visible and less distracting to pilots. Turns out the cheap and foolproof way to synchronize is to give each one a GPS receiver. This is fine until GPS goes down, and now something as innocuous as "blinking hazard light" is dependent on GPS.
This example fails safe if the lights fall out of sync ("oh no, anyway..."), but it's still emblematic of how widespread the problem can be.
Not that avoiding windmills is the priority on an airplane hit by a solar storm…
Yeah, it's a major concern. It's not just from solar storm events, but also warfare/cyber security. I suspect if a major world war were to breakout tomorrow, the internet (under sea cables) and satellites of all kind would be a significant target.
The time between detection and the CME hitting us would probably be measured in minutes. I don’t think it’s possible to shut down the grid in that timeframe.
But even if is, it's going to kill and hurt a lot of people. Probably less than setting every electrical device on (half of) the planet on fire or whatever, but good luck convincing people of that when their dad is on dialysis or all their food spoils and they can't get to the store.
Take the 2003 blackout. Yes, the whole shut down took 15 minutes (?). But thats because it was a cascading effect that had to travel down the lines. Once the fault was detected by a particular segment of the grid, the relays responded in milliseconds. They have since the 1920s? Add in an "incoming solar flare" fault condition and we can trip the whole grid in seconds and send a start signal to the diesel generators to warm up to bring her back up.
Pretty nifty trick.
Question is why would we? The grid has been undergoing a lot of strengthening against EMPs and flares for decades. Its not obvious to me that a flare can take it out, especially if we shed dumb loads (partial blackout, say data centers) before it hits to give the conductors and transformers head space.
Geomagnetically-induced current is different from the plain-vanilla EMPs anyway—GIC can last for hours.
If stuff was shielded, isolated, and grounded better, everything from your phone to your WiFi would work a lot better and have longer range. Wind slapping power lines together wouldn't destroy everything plugged in inside your house and solar flares wouldn't be more than a passing concern. The design changes to affect all of this aren't remotely expensive or difficult, we just don't.
Would this also affect m mammals, including us then?
Speaking from personal experience, this is BS. During a bad wind event, a bunch of lines came down, started a huge forest fire around 10 or 11pm which was heading for a small town with 50-70mph winds. First responders couldn't get in to warn anyone because the downed lines were energized, so they called up the power plant. The whole process to de-energize took hours. There is a kill-switch now, but most power plants apparently can't shut off the juice in a matter of seconds, and they may not even have a plan to do so in an emergency.
In https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrington_Event it is estimated that the time from spotting the flare to the solar storm was 17.6 hours. That's plenty of time.
The problem is figuring out how big the event is, and how directly it will hit us. So while we have over 17 hours to prepare, there might be some false positives due to our limited prediction skills. And, no matter the real consequences, people have limited patience for large economic disruptions over things that turned out to be nothing.
There's no reward for fixing a problem that doesn't happen and that people don't want to believe even exists. Bonus, if other networks are damaged while yours aren't, it must be because you protected your network so you're responsible!
So the information chain, starting with the telescope that detects the flare, and then has to work it's way up the food chain, so that sufficient people agree, and take presumably synchronised action, well, good luck with that.
You'd also ideally need a multi-hour warning, planes gotta land etc.
Make no mistake, shutting it down will result in some deaths [1]. And those deaths will be on the news tomorrow (if indeed news still exists.) On the other hand not shutting down will cause more deaths and massive destruction.
[1] think hospitals where the backup power failed, or didn't last long enough. Traffic intersections. Elevators. Water pumps. Airplanes. Trains. Take your pick.
The problem is communicating to everyone when that 8 minutes starts and how much time is left.
That's not how it works. There may be detectable precursors that could actually give warning, but the 8 minutes referenced is the time it takes light from the sun to reach earth. It's immediate in the sense that it is physically impossible to detect that before those 8 minutes have already elapsed and the light is hitting your detectors. You could try to move your detectors closer to the sun to detect earlier, but any signal you can possibly send back to earth goes at the same speed, so it doesn't help.
So maybe we are able to detect that at time X there will be solar flares. We know they will be here at X + 8min.
But if we start moving away now from the sun, we will have more time to deal with it.
If it was immediate it should also be immediate even if we moved to 20x distance of the sun, or no?
It is something we computed. Why? Because there is no way to measure the time it takes for light to get from the sun to the earth. You cannot synchronize a message. There is no "hello". There is no beginning. This is not like firing a starting pistol. We cannot ever know what is happening at the sun with less than 8 minutes of lag. It is a fundamental limit. Even sending a highly robust and extremely precise clock into the sun to measure events, then comparing those events to timelines on earth, would not work. You cannot do it in real time, but even after the fact is pretty much not possible due to relativistic effects.
This has been done with the moon.
But your points about no 8 minutes of warning stand.
But we're not worried about that part of things anyway - it's the mass part of the CME that is the issue.
Let’s ask the photon how much time has passed between it being created and hitting our eyeballs. I’m sure it will produce a very sensible answer—oh dear, hmm…
That isn't entirely true.
I guess, in reality, "turning off electricity" can work, if "turning off" means shutting down generation at the same time throughout an entire interconnected grid and physically disconnecting literally every transformer throughout that transmission grid before they're cooked by geomagnetically-induced current (GIC).
Induced DC current alone can heat the windings in high-voltage transformers to the point of catastrophic failure, and that's assuming they can disconnect the AC current already flowing through the windings—if they can't, it heats even faster. This can possibly be mitigated by using a CT or hall sensor combined with a separate winding to cancel out the flux in the transformer's core, but I suspect that kind of work hasn't been done because there's no cost benefit.
Some electricity providers have relaying systems in place meant to protect equipment, but the last time that was tested in real-world conditions (1989, in Québec) they failed to prevent equipment damage.
That says nothing about the transmission lines themselves, most of which are nowhere near protected from GIC, and could either overheat or allow enough DC to flow through smaller pole-mounted transformers , which magnetizes them and dramatically reduces their serviceable life (if not outright destroying them).
In the case of Hydro-Québec, GIC didn't cause equipment damage; their protection systems—the stuff meant to "turn off the electricity"—allowed damage to occur anyway.
1.https://www.astronomy.com/science/a-large-solar-storm-could-...
Original Paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature11123
Dating using Miyake events: https://www.science.org/content/article/marking-time-cosmic-...
Additional link: https://daily.jstor.org/the-carrington-event-of-1859-disrupt...
For example Russia using its whole arsenal to create maximum chaos to create some opportunities, or North Korea invading South Korea. Pakistan, China and Iran could def. also be cooking something.
Might as well go balls to the wall now that the enemy is weakened and you have a lot less to lose. Especially if your economy is mostly self-sustained and doesn't rely on globalization to function properly.
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_electromagnetic_pulse#...)
I think the question was more if any countries have ready made plans to exploit the natural disaster for military gain. Like does any country have a standing order to in the case of massive global disruption subdue or attack their geopolitical rivals?
So the hypothetical nation state here would need a ready-to-go plan ready to roll out at any time, and the plan must assume the native country also has all electronics knocked out along with the adversarial country. Such an all-out attack by itself would turn the world against this aggressor, moreso since it exploited the event and was premeditated. I think it's unlikely, it would be a crazy thing to do.
Now, who do I think might want to pull off something like this? A terrorist group could have a plan spooled up just waiting for this event. That, and I would expect some opportunists to appear as well.
- Carrington event
- Krakatoa eruption of 1883
- large or prolonged earthquake in the New Madrid seismic zone
- the big one around San Francisco
- non-apocalyptic meteor impact (can’t think of a good example)
- there have been reasonably significant variations in climate in the last 5k years or so, and somewhat significant changes on the scale of centuries but I’m not counting them as they’re too slow. The current anthropogenic climate change is faster but I also want to exclude it (and catastrophes in the technical sense like changes to large-scale air/ocean currents, ocean acidification, etc) from the list.
Tunguska explosion in 1908: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunguska_event
For a meteor impact, I'd cite the Tunguska Event, which was a "3-5 megaton explosion" in Siberia in 1908: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunguska_event
There's also alien invasions, pandemics, etc.
Last event was 6k years, half harmonic of the main 12k years cycle. The carrington event signed the arrival of the galatic current sheet (a rippling magnetic wave emitted by the core of the milky way) which, among other things, causes the earth magnetic field to decrease.
There was no "very nearby supernova", it's just the sun and the event is much smaller but still a kind of nova (called micronova).
The induced current from the micronova is believed to be able to unlock the crust from the mantle which adds to the magnetic pole shift a physical pole shift.
The younger dryas impact theory is wrong in the way that the impact was just a proxy of the micronova (full coronal mass ejection) and not the cause.
Civilization has cycles too, I guess.
A massive earthquake around San Francisco is unlikely to happen. The lower-magnitude earthquakes that area experiences release crust stress and prevent it from building up to the levels necessary to create a Magnitude 9+ earthquake.
The big one will be further north, leveling Seattle and Portland.
This doesn't have to be a wire in a coil, like in a motor, transformer, or generator, but can simply be a standalone wire, like the telegraph lines burning down their own poles during the Carrington Event.
Or, a high-voltage power line could induce a massive surge while the coils in its transformers are also generating their own spike on each side of each transformer.
A wide-spread event with a powerful magnetic storm would result in utter chaos, and it'd be nearly impossible to repair the damage. In the case of a solar storm, it's likely that a wide swath of the entire planet would receive a portion of the CME as the Earth turns on its axis from day to night.
Edit: If its not obvious, level 5 FSD will assume permanent availability of communication, GPS, sensors etc to be working at all times. So having a steering wheel backup for critical unforeseen situations should be a good redundancy and safety measure.
It doesn’t discuss seeing it during the day, but it was visible in places where it would never otherwise be.
(In case web.archive.org is blocked at your workplace.)
tl;dr never made to anything having anything to do with solar storms...
In general it’s going to be a disaster, but people are prepared for it (as much as one can be anyhow)
More precisely, it's 8, the average is 500 years, and the last one was in 1700.
There is a fair bit of variability in the 500 year average, and 8 is still a seriously large earthquake, so preparations are definitely justified IMO.
The results I've seen (from a decade and a half ago) pegged the probability of a magnitude > 9 in the next 50 years at 1/10 and a magnitude > 8 at 1/3.
The 500 years average is if you look at the last 7 events. 7 is a horribly low sample size and if you extend the timescale, that average drops by half and indicates we are past the 250 year average.
- stockpiles of food and medicine
- various shelters
- excess local manufacturing capacity
- transparent, public, reviewable plans for different contingencies
- subsidized making normal consumer devices more robust (e.g. repairable, RF-hard, etc. -- anything which can be done at reasonable cost)
- training and coordinating responders, including something like the National Guard or territorial defense forces, but more general in scope.
- making sure we can produce everything we need to survive locally (food, medicine, and the infrastructure to support those)
... and so on.
It's hard to predict the next disaster, but we should be ready.
A better plan is for two weeks.
Back in the day, with the first surge of the Avian flu, Governor Schwarzenegger ordered an bought a large supply of respirators, "just in case".
That stock pile was released and not maintained by later administrations. Then COVID hit.
The problem with something like a Carrington event is that the potential impact is very widespread. The large bulk of our disaster planning is local. The planning rightly expects the cavalry to come to the rescue directly. Katrina was a poster child of both a good and bad response. The Houston boat lift is another. The rest of the country rallies and pivots to the disaster area sending material and people to aid the stricken.
Having a 2 week store when you can shelter in place is a Good Plan for a very large majority of potential disasters. It doesn't work great for fire or floods (where you lose your home, and thus have no place to shelter). But the plan is to be able to maintain for the 2 weeks while the cavalry arrives.
The problem with something like a Carrington event, is the disaster is no longer localized. But very wide spread, thus that cavalry that was planned for is probably not coming. Not soon. Not in time. And the rules have changed dramatically. It's a nightmare scenario. Despite the wide spread devastation of the Tsunami, it, too, was localized, and aid flowed quickly, even across the sea. With a Carrington event, not so much.
This is where, ideally, communities must rally themselves, on their own initiative, to share resources and manage as best they can. As you can imagine, some communities may be able to do this better than others. But your 2 week supply for your family is now likely better used to support others in your community. For every Ant preparing for winter, there are a lot of Grasshoppers. And they get unruly when they get hungry.
It would be unprecedented, and the only real course is to muddle through best we can. State and Federal disaster planning may or may not help here. Back in the day, the USDA running the Welfare programs stockpiled and delivered food (the infamous "government cheese"). Today they just offer debit cards. I don't know if there are warehouses of cheese and peanut butter standing by anywhere any more.
Still, you can do you part, you can do your best. Engage with your neighbors, stockpile a bit more food (don't need to fill the garage with a year supply of dried beans, but an extra case of tuna won't hurt). Make your preparedness part of a continuing cycle of giving, as your stockpile starts reaching the 6 month due date, donate it to a food pantry, and get some more. But reaching out to your neighbors can help a lot, get them to work on their 2 weeks supply.
Its not all about guns and gear. It's more about civility, and having a little more food or blankets to share with others in times of crisis. No reason to expect to feed the whole neighborhood, but don't expect them to leave you alone with your stocked garage while they go hungry.
1) We want food production overcapacity, so if there is e.g. a 25% hit due to a freak weather event, or a diseases killing 100% of this years' corn crop, we don't have widespread food shortages.
2) That overcapacity should go somewhere. Large warehouses seem like reasonable places for it to go.
A lot of other things -- like medicines -- I can't realistically manage.
And rotating food is, well, a lot of hard work for someone absent-minded. I think one of my key questions is about how bad expired food gets. I've heard of people eating (and even growing) literally ancient grains. "Best before" isn't always "toxic after."
We used to be able to make big plans like this maybe a 75 years ago, during the era of WWII and the early cold war. Let's stick a man on the moon! Make a nuclear bomb! Create a whole new system of government! Etc.
If the large backbone transformers in the grid are not outfitted with fast ground fault interrupters they would be damaged and the grid for large regions would go down. There are no backup transformers waiting. It would take a few to many months to produce and install new backbone transformers even in normal times. It might take more when the grid is down. This lack of electricity would have compounding effects.
A much lesser worry is the satellites in orbit getting deep ion charging and sparking and getting damaged.
As a kid, thunderstorms commonly knocked out the grid. Now as an adult I've rarely seen the power go out (It usually happens due to someone ramming a power line with their car).
When lighting hits you get a few microsecond burst of a whole lot of power that gets dumped to ground. Your grounding will get very hot from this, but typically you're not getting hit constantly all day in the same grounding location.
Now imagine this. You start getting excess power to the point it's starting to drive primary movers on the grid. You disconnect them because you don't want bad shit happening to your generators. But your grid is still generating power, in some places an awful lot of power that is acting more like DC rather than AC. So you're going to dump this to ground right? Have you ever welded? Because when you dump power to ground it's still power and it makes things hot. Unless you build in massive heatsinks you're going to have a problem.
Engineer at electric company: "We'd like to get this project on the calendar for the quarter; should make the equipment more resilient against the risk of solar storms."
Accountant at electric company: "What are the odds this solar storm happens in the next quarter?"
Engineer: "We cannot accurately predict the timing of a solar storm; however, as time goes on, the probability of a solar storm causing damage to our equipment gets closer to 1."
Accountant: "That's not enough certainty when compared to the necessity of profitability." scratches grid hardening off priority list
Now, "prepared" means "society not collapsing", and "profitability" means that a retired couple can buy a timeshare on a golf course in Florida where they can swing until the dementia sets in, but priorities are priorities.
Engineer: "We cannot accurately predict the timing of a solar storm; however, over a long enough timeframe, the probability of a solar storm causing damage to our equipment is close to 1."
The accountants are given the receipts after the engineers have already spent company money, and their job is to account for that spending.
The finance department are the people who decide whether the engineers get to spend the money. (They're also known as the FP&A team = financial planning and analysis.)
If I had a dollar for every time a programmer claimed something was "critical" but was actually just an expense for something they were doing to pad their resume for their next job, I would be as rich as Warren Buffet.
Edit to match parent's edit: I like how you turned it from a hardware engineering discussion with large and expensive equipment necessary to some flippant software comment. If I had a dollar for every time someone derails a conversation, I'd be Bezos rich
It's kind of like the difference between a single (smallish) wave caused by a boat and a tsunami. The boats wave can cause damage but it's typically very limited. Meanwhile the tsunami doesn't stop coming and becomes your environment. Fast grounding doesn't mean much when dumping to ground stops working because the ground gets so hot it's a resistor.
Sure, you can answer the question "What can a major solar storm do to our planet?" in two paragraphs, why not, if one would need a very quick, very short summary of what a major solar storm could to our planet.
But.
Some people might want a more in-depth answer, going into great detail. Some people might want so much detail that they might read a whole-ass book about a subject.
Long form articles are not bad or unwanted; they bridge the space between a short summary and a book (along with essays, studies, etc). What is bad, though, is thinking everything should be reduced to a short two paragraph summary, or a 1min tiktok video, or a video. All mediums of communication have their uses and their niches, serving different needs.
Why is this relevant? Consider where that speculation started: local news networks [2].
It's worth reading Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars [3] if you haven't already to understand why it's worth me mentioning this. Easily dismissed as "conspiracy nonsense," but it's worth asking "why this, why now?"
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7scPFH0aq9U
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksb3KD6DfSI
[3] https://archive.org/details/silent-weapons-for-quiet-wars-or...
There is not much in it, besides a (presumably) faked origin and typesetting, a brief analogy to physics and electronics, hushed talk of banks and domination, and a lot of hand waving and winking at the reader
I disagree. It gestures to a lot more (operational research, electronics, physics, etc), but just loosely points to them to make analogies. If you have no familiarity with those subjects, it is better to read about them elsewhere. If you are familar with them, then the analogies just seem shallow and don't provide to the pamphlet other than to fluff it up to make it seem more scientific than it is.
The rest of it refers to bankers (Rothchild!), domination and sub-nations. It also has a presumably fake origin story, and smacks of being a modern Elders of Zion like work.
I didn't know anything about this pamphlet other than what you posted before reading it (and I only read it because it has a provocative title), but I would suggest to anyone else not to waste their time- go read instructive books on operational research, cybernetics, etc, instead of this pretending to be a secret book from the 70's
You didn't read it, then (you replied to me within 30 minutes).
That’s because it is conspiracy nonsense. It’s totally bonkers if you read it with an actual open mind… as opposed to a mind already seeking to reinforce notions about some NWO and that most others are simply cattle with their brains tuned off.
TBH, Reddit is a better place for fancy math and circuit diagrams to be taken at face value to help perpetuate conspiratorial systems thinking.
because we're once again in high activity part of Sun's 11-year cycle
we'll have higher amount of flairs than 3-6-9 years ago, generating relating news articles and provoking thoughts and discussions in this direction