2,086 karma · joined May 2, 2013
vijay.v @ google's email thingy | http://hk.linkedin.com/in/varanasivijay
[1] https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Comfortaa [2] https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Pacifico [3] https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Merriweather
You have a problem. The lenses you are wearing make everything look negative.
> It's quite straightforward
In my mind, this was a statement assuring him that it is not complicated; Windows settings can sometimes be complicated, such as involving Registry hacks.
See, this is why Linux zealots don't effect any change in others. When OP wrote something incorrect about Windows, in my perception, I gave him the benefit of doubt ("Maybe you haven't been using Windows in recent years"). But when I wrote something incorrect, in your perception, you straightaway jumped to "lying".
And it's not as if you don't know that the possibility exists. You wrote, "just google for 'windows 10 ignores active hours'", which shows that you know that I possibly do not know about this.
And yes, I have no idea if this is truly the case. I suppose Microsoft determines that some updates are critical security patches and will push them through despite attempts to postpone indefinitely.
Of course, if they allowed you to postpone critical updates and you got hacked, then it's, "OMG!! This evil corporation WANTED me to get hacked, that's why I use Linux", right? You're hopeless, and I will not be wasting further time replying to you.
Edit: I did that Google search and found that Windows ignores Active Hours in the sense that it still downloads the updates. But it does not Restart the PC. I could be wrong, but I'd appreciate if you can state it politely.
Maybe it's been a couple of years since you tried Windows? Right now, if you go to the Windows Update part of Settings, the top 2 options are:
a) "Pause updates for 7 days" and
b) "Change active hours", which can be used to specify an 18-hour window within which, "We won't automatically restart your device during this time"
It's quite straightforward.
Unfortunately, I didn't find a single video showing the power of both Linked Notes AND Dock to Desktop, but these two show the usage of these features separately:
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-27407502
What I'm trying to say is: it doesn't matter what the tool is. If the process / outcome are worth it, then starting to write is much more valuable than the exact tool (that you choose to get the cool kids nodding their heads in agreement). Productivity is cool.
Mercurial should have won. And Plastic SCM is awesome, designed conceptually from the ground up to build on lessons learned from git (and by an Associate Professor in CS). In fact, the whole concept of DVCSs is ridiculous in 99% of corporate contexts where you can't use your laptop / desktop at home without logging in into the VPN. Why do we even need distributed version control in such a setting? Subversion is perfectly enough and even non-developer users can actually understand and use Subversion effectively. See https://svnvsgit.com/
Mind you, I'm not a blind hater: I love that Linus did well in life. I'd be thrilled if his net worth was a billion instead of just $150 million. Surely, he contributed much more than that.
It's exactly like how duck typing took over programming in the last decade or so with, "Whee, see, less typing!!", and we lost the value of having static types ("strong typing"). Why are we tempted so easily? Now we have the horror of Javascript everywhere. Even the Node.js founders recoil from their own creation and are going a step in the right direction with Deno.
About feelings: you have to feel your feelings, but productivity is difficult if you're always feeling down. Don't beat up yourself, which adds a 2nd layer of sadness to an already sad situation. Get enough sleep and work on things that excite you.
Good point.
I cannot imagine why you would find the joy of configurability an "asinine dick swinging contest". I find /r/unixporn unpretentious and wholesome. I find most posts there done out of sheer joy and pride. No one is selling anything or shilling anything.
https://socket3.wordpress.com/2018/02/03/designing-windows-9...
https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Options-Trading-Frans-We...
(Basically Anjunadeep, Patrice O' Neal, and Batman :-) ).
I believe their recommendation ML is top-notch and they keep improving it. For example, it seems to have finally learned that I absolutely effing hate "reaction" videos (it used to struggle with that ~ 1 year ago).
By the way, where do you live? For me, in Hong Kong, cold showers are not really that difficult at 15 degrees celsius (59 degrees fahrenheit).
b) The Windows 95 UI looks nothing like NextStep (or SGI IRIX and the other X Windows UIs of the time) to my eyes. In particular, they made a distinct move away from the drab grey look of all Unix UIs, which was a really welcome splash of color. I still find that grey look reminding me of my days in the Unix lab at college, and I find it hard to relate to the enthusiasm of Apple fans for the boring grey look of macOs, which is clearly a '70s Unix look!
> I press both of my thumbs down in their resting positions and the home row suddenly becomes
Three keys to type in one symbol sounds bad to me, but it sounds like it works just fine for you!
I think 40% keyboards work well for gamers, but are impractical for developers, who need to access all the symbol keys ( (, {, [, etc;), and often need access to the function keys, too. Layering, having to press Fn and another key to achieve what could be a single keypress on a 101-key keyboard, just adds work. The input mechanism must be seamless so that one may focus on the actual work. The keyboard should just disappear. The much-touted keyboard.io has the same limitation.