I don't get it. There seems to be a sentiment in these comments that older → ill-suited; ill-suited being the
actual reason why the anecdote about Excel is noteworthy. WordStar on DOS is a
word processor. It's old and uncool, sure, but it's not ill-suited for the task in the way that Excel is.
Someone below mentions that Excel is probably an "upgrade" from a typewriter. What. Sure, Excel has undo and arbitrary text insertion, but so does Photoshop. Ask yourself if Photoshop would be an upgrade from a typewriter just because it's newer. At some point, the impedance mismatch wrt the actual task it was conceived for is so great that it will dominate any equation related to suitability for a particular purpose. So even the most recent version of Excel is still more ill-suited for writing than things actually made for writing, like typewriters and old word processors.