pachico

Regarding metrics from logs, you might agree that it's now an overkill.

Because I use as a gateway for fastcgi and as TLS initiator, mostly. Nginx doesn't allow you to have distinct metrics for both use cases, which is far from ideal.

My tests in controlled environments show that caddy is absolutely fine for my workload and has perks that make my life easier. Some have been mentioned in this thread already.

Metrics is a must have in our case as we have many things to manage, few people to maintain things and alerts are the only way to grow. For alerts you need metrics.

I just wish Nginx had the good will to include decent metrics. The built-in stubs are far from enough.

It's the main reason why I'm thinking about migrating everything to Caddy.

Am I too paranoid to think they did this to force people to install their app?

Damn, I was reading this hoping it was the page of the ultimate browser/mobile app or extension...

How did we get so far without having all this by default?

My main issue with TOML is precisely described in the homepage example:

[servers]

[servers.alpha]

is error prone. An sub heading shouldn't need to know about its parent, much less to have to copy it entirely.

I think I will always start my sentences with "As a nerd of a certain age," now. It will give so much more context to all my conversations :)

In general, I have no objections to well explained opt-in anything.

Spanish Catalans will not be pleased by reading that Catalan is only mentioned to be spoken in Andorra.

https://en.wal.unesco.org/languages/standard-catalan

502 bad gateway, so far

I agree 100%, but here's a plot twist:

- Don't fall in the trap of early abstraction...

- and abstracting one single use case is very hard, if not impossible...

- but you are writing your app in Go and interfaces are the only way to properly test your stuff...

- The end.

This looks like gold for a project that would create scripts via LLM

Unrelated but "offensive" is not necessarily bad.

We should accept that people can get offended by anything and, because of this, just demote the concept.

Please don't get this the wrong way as it's an admission and confession of ethnocentrism: I use chopsticks quite fluently, I like to think, but I still cannot understand why people aren't switching to forks once they try them out for the first time :)

They do as they might be the reasons why you can use spots in the first place

I think this post backfired at the writer. While trying to provide transparency over a problem (we all screw up) it uncovered what I think it's a horrible idea.

The issue is not the bug anymore but the update process.

These comments in HN might provide much more insights than the bug itself.

Maybe this will encourage developers to make smaller applications too.

The article fails to recommend to use re-balancing feature that allows you to run spots in production without worrying too much.

It doesn't mention either that price-capacity-optimized allocation strategy.

If you want to run spots in production, please read about three two. There is no major drama if you apply them.

Aged 2-6?

Am I the only one thinking "leave them kids alone!"?

I use PlantUML every single day. It can be embedded in Markdown docs and even Confluence (which I hate but I'm forced to use).

Diagram as Code is simply awesome. My only issue is how ugly it looks, even using themes.

I wish an application managed to be a drop in replacement that looked like it wasn't drawn in MS Paint in 1996.

I understand. For us, Loki locally is just to provide parity for test environments.

However, I would have used vector anyway locally as I prefer to have a centralised collector.

So far, no problems using Vector to ship logs to Grafana Cloud (Loki).

Just the fastest and most ergonomic browser I've tried.

I wish Firefox was like Brave, to be honest. Until that happens, I'll stick to Brave for both mobile and desktop.

You seem to describe the Event Source paradigm rather than a database :)

Have agreed... Let's say that one side agreed more than the other to fire the former...

I have no idea.

I guess it will be something like guaranteed availability and privacy options. I'm speculating.

Premium has not be released yet.

Phind.com is so much better.

I just want to pay for the service in exchange of ensuring they won't use my data but I can't find how.

This is terribly demagogic

Unfortunately, this is the result of years of AB tests that prove that urgency messages increase conversion.

They don't stress customers just for the sake of having a less pleasant experience.

I work in the online accomodation business, BTW.