opencl

Does the 4K 120Hz actually work properly? There are a lot of TVs that claim to support 4K 120Hz but actually display the signal at half vertical resolution as 3840x1080.

The SDK basically gives remote shutter control and file transfer. There is nothing in it that could plausibly damage anything.

Microcenter is probably the closest thing left to that niche now. They have pretty decent 3D printing and DIY electronics sections.

It's viable in the sense that you can just stick a server motherboard inside of a desktop case. It certainly won't be cheap though.

This has been done as a commercial product with the Ampere ARM server chips. The base model is about $8k.

https://store.avantek.co.uk/arm-desktops.html

Really I think the worst part of driving this monitor with plain displayport is that there's no way to control the brightness, just like the LG 5K.

Back in the day the R32 GT-R had a boost restrictor marked in bright yellow. Removing it gave an extra ~4PSI from the turbos good for about 60 extra HP.

It's not hard to find 4K 17" panels as spare parts for laptops, but they're generally 16:9 rather than 16:10.

The RP2040 actually has built in 12Mbps USB 1.1, no serial bridge required. But if you do want to use a serial to USB bridge the max baud rate is 921600.

I'm not sure how it's implemented, but Flutter does work with screen readers.

https://docs.flutter.dev/development/accessibility-and-local...

The loophole for years has been not being connected to the internet, they're getting rid of that.

Buying LTSC licenses as an individual is not particularly easy or cheap.

You can already do this with Neverware CloudReady, which Chrome OS Flex is basically a rebrand of.

https://www.ifixit.com/News/30282/how-to-get-updates-on-your...

There have also been a few projects to boot the ARM version of Windows on various Android phones, no VM involved. None of them really have good enough driver support to use as a daily driver though.

For example this one[1] for the Oneplus 6/6T.

[1]https://forum.xda-developers.com/t/windows-10-arm-on-oneplus...

There have been a few 'magic machines' for developing film over the last few years, but they are not cheap. i.e. the Filmomat[1] costs 4K Euros.

There are also some simpler products that just make the process a little easier, like the Lab Box[2] which basically just offers an easier way to load the film onto the spool. Developing B&W film with this type of machine is pretty easy and the chemicals are cheap.

[1] https://www.filmomat.eu/

[2] https://www.lab-box.it/

It's been done, the schematics are readily available and the chips are still easy to find (technically not the original 74xx models, but the pin-compatible 74LS and 74HC series).

https://forums.arcade-museum.com/threads/reproduction-pong-p...

They didn't work around any patents, they buy the panels from the company holding the patents.

This is the panel you'll find in the Dasung and Mira monitors: https://shopkits.eink.com/product/25-3%cb%9d-spectra-3100-ep...

The graviton chips are not an in house architecture, the cores are designed by and licenced from ARM.

There are a lot of C compilers out there, and many of them have not implemented all of C99. Microsoft started to add C99 features in MSVC2013 and still doesn't support the whole spec.

The C compilers supplied by microcontroller vendors in particular are often, to put it charitably, not great at conforming with the latest standards.

The Pop OS shop is a fork of Elementary's Appcenter.

Those last few percent are a huge amount of work, they were at 93% in July.

https://twitter.com/alyssarzg/status/1414354306157875204

As far as I can tell this project is not about compiling Python into hardware. It's a build tool for Verilog written in Python.

A 4 lane PCIe switch would allow for a much cheaper board and still be plenty to saturate the available bandwidth. Maybe 2x 2.5Gbe with one hooked to a switch, plus wifi.

Around this price point there are already ARM boards (and passively cooled x86 machines) available much better suited to this kind of use case, like the Honeycomb LX2K.

The M1 Max 32 core GPU is ~1/8 the performance of the 3090. 4x the core count should put it half of 3090 performance, not double.

TPM 2.0 allows communications over the bus to be encrypted specifically to prevent this attack, though Windows apparently does not actually use this feature[0].

Newer CPUs (since about 5 years ago) have the TPM embedded in the CPU. Intel calls this PTT and AMD calls it fTPM.

[0] https://pulsesecurity.co.nz/articles/TPM-sniffing

You only get the bubbles if you install the extension.

The actual paper is here, complete with graphs: https://www.jpeds.com/article/S0022-3476(17)31758-4/fulltext

It's still there in the server chips, they just removed it from consumer parts.

It's actually there in Alder Lake's performance cores and can be used on at least some motherboards if the efficiency cores are disabled.

Most of the small hobbyist machines I've seen (including this one) use Grbl, and Grbl does support G02/G03.

You can install an extension (i.e. dash to dock) to make the launcher ever-present on whichever side of the screen you want. The main downside is that the extensions always break on GNOME upgrades and take a little while to get fixed.

Modern is probably a stretch but it is certainly still being developed.

You can see the commit log at https://sourceforge.net/p/cdesktopenv/code/ci/9ca0cf7545500a...

If you follow the "If you have updates to the chart, please submit as a GitHub issue." link, you can see that there are a few dozen open issues and the page was last updated 2 years ago.