Ubuntu is good as a stable platform, but it's probably too slow moving.
69 karma · joined January 19, 2021
Ubuntu is good as a stable platform, but it's probably too slow moving.
Yeah, like my node_modules folder doesn't contain tons of duplicate code.
/s
/s
They had really bad support for OpenGL and wanted developers to use Apple's Metal API. But developers stayed on DirectX (Windows-only) or OpenGL/Vulkan for Linux/Windows/Android crossplatform. It just wasn't economically viable to develop for Mac.
It's not out yet, but uses the Source 2 engine and C# for modding, and will probably have an active community from launch.
While GMod mods are based on Lua, S&Box uses C#, which is an awesome choice, imo. C# is a bit more verbose than Lua, but it probably enables mods of higher quality.
It's not out yet, but some keys get distributed to chosen people. Sadly, I'm not one of those.
He only asked how much it's going to be and was charged with over double what he was quoted.
For example Apple's store doesn't want these web wrappers: https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/#min...
There are a lot of people with significant contributions without which the world wouldn't be in its current state.
That also assumes that the atmosphere you're venting for that "cheap vacuum" is cheap as well.
He told me that the school had to prevent those automatic budget cuts. His reasoning was that it's nearly impossible to get a higher budget if some big expenses had to be made. And suddenly needing a higher budge, after for example 3 years of low expenses, doesn't make a good impression on higher-level administrators.
> and the computers needed to run them are cheap
Old computers aren't always cheap. Retro PCs get expensive quick.
Text Rendering, CSS Layouts, Accessibility, being good at cross-platform, Canvas/WebGL and a myriad of other APIs make Electron pretty powerful. I don't know exactly, but I think QT would be it's main competitor when it comes to those features. But QT isn't always that easy to develop with.
People on the Pinephone forum. Simple survivorship bias.
Judging from the videos I've seen, the Pinephone is for tinkerers for now.
Just curious.
Some people classify the lucidity of a dream as "non-lucid", "semi-lucid" and "lucid".
"Non-Lucid" is just a normal dream. "Semi-Lucid" is a dream in which you know that you're dreaming, but you don't have real control and are just going with the flow. In real lucid dreams you're fully aware that you're dreaming and can control yourself (movement & talking). Experiencing a lucid dream is just plain awesome in my experience. You know that the experience is not real, but it feels real.
Controlling the dream itself (surroundings, other people, flying etc) is something the dreamer has to learn, as it isn't as straight-forward as just thinking/saying "I want to fly now"/"Let there be an orgy". If your brain doesn't expect something to happen, then it likely won't happen.
Flying is relatively easy because it really doesn't change your surroundings. I just imagine how I'm flying and it happens.
To change my surroundings I usually use the "spinning"/"blinking" trick: Either spin around or slowly blink with your eyes while imagining what you want to change. With some good luck it happens.
But dreams are unstable. Things can change quickly and without your control. It's a constant fight against your subconscious. A fight which often leads to waking up.
I have a recommendation for anyone still reading: Instead of flying or fucking/killing people (those were the most common themes on the forums back then), just talk with the people in your dream. You're not talking with real people, you're talking with yourself, but it doesn't feel that way. Talking with dream characters can be useful for introspection, as dreams are heavily influenced by your feelings.
Man, that all sounds so esoteric and non-scientific. Just my experience.
/s
The server needs to store your DB somehow too.