Unfortunately, nothing can remove the temperature of the atmosphere (which affects infrared imaging), or the absorption of many wavelength bands.
2,671 karma · joined September 1, 2021
https://github.com/kevinloch/
Unfortunately, nothing can remove the temperature of the atmosphere (which affects infrared imaging), or the absorption of many wavelength bands.
The nearest star to us after the Sun is ~4ly away, or ~250k AU. The Sun would have to be ~63 billion times brighter to give the same incident radiation at 250k AU, and that is just a typical distance between stars in our neighborhood . The Sun is also brighter than the average star, especially the older stars that congregate near the galactic center.
Galaxies can easily have 1 trillion stars but they are usually so spread out as to make this impractical. This is also why the Milky Way, Triangulum, LMC, SMC, and Andromeda (nearest galaxies) are so faint to the naked eye.
Someone (Richard Steenbergen?) once made a joke that we should take the last 6509/7609 and launch it into orbit to celebrate.
It's not that they weren't popular. At one point in the mid 2000's they appeared to make up about 1/3 of major internet routers (if you looked around a carrier hotel). This was due to their extremely low cost compared to actual high end routers. While they had serious limitations and were notoriously sensitive to "IOS roulette", somehow you could just make them work.
I'm sorry, I just cannot do this. I start to feel somewhat guity after 300 characters but 80 feels like an Atari 800.
I also remember telnet BBS's became popular for a few years when I was in college 91-93.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Van_Flandern#Exploding_pla...
I would say you are most likely to find this usage of that word in well regarded and highly edited, publications.
Assemble some unstable atoms (that decay into carbon) into the desired cubic structure. When they decay you have a diamond.
The problem with this is that if it can decay fast enough (even with outside neutrons) it will be too hot (pun intended), and if it decays slowly enough it will take too long. Depending on the source isotopes and process it could also result in a radioactive diamond! Also, the heat of the process would have to not change the crystal structure.
However, some day when we master quarks and the weak interaction we might be able to do this quickly and safely.
Full polarization and phase info would be great to have also but probably not necessary for reflection suppression. And yes purely circular polarization would be undefined in this scenario but again not common (possible?) with reflections.
This would just be a fully electronic/computational version of a mechanical polarizing filter.
It feels like answers come "from outer space" or "from God" but it's really just a highly optimized and efficient part of the brain for a very specific function. For that narrow function your brain has an effective IQ of something like 2000. As our brains have a much lower average IQ, we don't have the context to understand how we found the answer so we experience it and describe it as intuition.
If our entire brain operated at an IQ of 2000, we wouldn't experience it as intuition or a flash of genius, we would just say "I figured it out".
What I have read about Ramanujan sounds like he had some form of high functioning savant syndrome. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savant_syndrome
If you are making a new image/video codec in 2024 please don't just give us 2 measly extra bits of DR. Support up to 16 bit unsigned integer and floating point options. Sheesh.
We need a better way to sift through the mountains of make-work papers to find the stuff that actually works and is useful. Ironically, AI will probably help with that, at least until it outperforms humans at scientific discoveries itself.
When I started to help friends overclock theirs, I quickly realized the "silicon lottery" variance. Some would only run reliably at 78 or 76 MHz. I bought a bunch of fixed frequency clock generators (that were drop-in replacements for the original on the motherboard) in 2MHz increments due to the variance.
This was back before CPU's had heat sinks or fans, so we quickly figured out that adding those gave better margins. We even made some 10-LED bar temperature display that had a thermocouple glued to the CPU case and indicated 10 degree C increments (green=0-60c, yellow=70-80c, red=90-100c).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-tel
> K-tel was founded by Philip Kives,[4] a demonstration salesman from Oungre, Saskatchewan.[5][6] Kives had worked at a number of jobs as a young man, including selling cookware door-to-door and in a department store, and as a pitch-man on the Boardwalk in Atlantic City.
As my dad used to say "It's volts that jolts, but mills that kills!"
(you can survive a jolt very large voltage, but only a few milliamps across the heart can kill you)
The sound company he started with his highschool friend (National Sound) ended up doing the first 11 world tours for Rush. He pioneered "flying" PA speakers above the stage in the 1970's. Before that they were commonly just stacked on the front/sides of the stage. Later, National Sound merged with another company to form National Events, which did sound/light/staging for almost all of the major concerts and political rallies on the national mall in DC for several decades.
I made a tribute video after his death in 2007: https://kevinloch.com/tommy/tommytribute-highres.avi
In decades past my hands were cut many times in data center racks because of this. Fortunately, zip ties have gone out of fashion and everyone uses Velcro now. The advantages of Velcro over zip ties in data center racks:
- Even pressure and no risk of over tightening
- Trivial to re-work when cables are added/removed
- No more cut hands!
The only downside is that sometimes the loops can be too loose and slide down to the next loop. This is especially common when very few cables are being bound and the Velcro structure does not want to conform to such a tight radius.
You just need the ability to make things that work. And by "work" I mean actually work, and in a way that others want to use it (an intuitive interface that needs almost no training/explanation helps a lot here). It doesn't have to be polished, pretty, or anywhere near feature complete (see: Apple 1). It just has to pass the "will people actually use this beyond the novelty phase" test. I can't stress enough how important intuitive function is above form at this stage.
That's step 1.
Step 2 is to have a management team that can effectively monetize that thing and manage the risks (financial/legal/market) that all businesses have to deal with. Engineers are usually not good at these things.
I've succeeded at step 1 many times but I'm personally not good at Step 2.
I love NetBSD and their focus ppears to be so you can run a modern supported/bugfixed OS on legacy hardware.
So FreeBSD and NetBSD are perfect compliments to each other.