Converting a Cisco 7609 into a beer tap (2021)
blog.jonasbengtson.se
blog.jonasbengtson.se
> Once upon a time, a lovely piece of Purple networking hardware got pushed into the obscene job of having to function in tapping the internet for law-enforcement purposes. After liberating the quarter-million-dollar-networking-switch, we have taken it upon ourselves to offer it a worthy retirement plan that allows it to re-socialize itself. The Internet Beer Tap became a fact.
I was pretty surprised to find that the project documentation was uploaded to a modern website when I searched. I figured like many things of its era that it had been lost to web rot.
https://www.instructables.com/Convert-a-Silicon-Graphics-Ser...
http://www.8bit-homecomputermuseum.at/computer/silicon_graph...
10/10, no notes.
Would do again.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:SGI_Espressigo#/...
It pains me a little to see nice old pieces of equipment turned into something... lesser... but it's harmless fun and in the moment when they're surplus and valueless, well, we can't keep all of them up and running.
Someone (Richard Steenbergen?) once made a joke that we should take the last 6509/7609 and launch it into orbit to celebrate.
It's not that they weren't popular. At one point in the mid 2000's they appeared to make up about 1/3 of major internet routers (if you looked around a carrier hotel). This was due to their extremely low cost compared to actual high end routers. While they had serious limitations and were notoriously sensitive to "IOS roulette", somehow you could just make them work.
For anyone reading this that doesn't have experience with these things, when the parent commenter talks about "just making them work," one failure mode among many in these devices is that packet forwarding is primarily done in hardware, more or less at line rate. But, if you enable an IOS feature that isn't supported in hardware, it gets processed in software. In more "ISP-focused" routers, it is common to just not support features that aren't implemented in hardware. Forwarding performance on these platforms goes from almost 500 million packets per second in hardware (in certain highly specific and very unlikely scenarios) to around 40 - 50 thousand packets per second -- absolute best-case -- in software. Another failure mode specifically applicable to the ISP scenario is the fixed hardware forwarding table size, which for many models was 192k IPv4 prefixes. could you have a larger forwarding table size? Absolutely. In software.
Interesting side note is that Compaq ProLiant servers of roughly the same vintage as C7600 actually use optical fibers for system status LEDs. (And using fiber instead of rigid lightpipes is not that uncommon in HDD trays)
https://www.lightreading.com/routing-switching/iskratel-s-br...