467 karma · joined February 14, 2013
(now maybe they all work at NRC, I'll give you that)
So if the EU goes to fines being "% of worldwide turnover"... do the math
There are many counterexamples to this.
And run their own DCs? Cool, they'll just need a lot of upfront capital aaaaaand they're back in the "need money" boat. Except more so.
1. The problems that supporters say net neutrality would fix are fictitious (the tweet), already handled (Comcast and bittorrent traffic), or not necessarily addressed by net neutrality (zero rating)
2. Title II classification entails much more regulation than net neutrality
3. Therefore applying Title II to ISPs will raise the barrier to entry for new entrants and not address the supposed harms
> at some point somebody fell for a fake tweet?
Not just "somebody"--the guy who coined the term "net neutrality" and advises the government.
Sidebar: I was 1000% pro-Title II last time this came up in 2015 and went through https://www.battleforthenet.com/ , I think to email my legislators.
Fortunately, I used a tagged/aliased email address. That address has apparently gotten into the Democrats' "never lose this email" bin. I regularly get emails from politicians I absolutely never wanted to hear from, all to that email. I try to unsubscribe, but they won't let me go.
>
> [ERNIE:] [...] Xinjiang is an ethnic autonomous area mainly inhibited by the Uyghur people.
Typo or Freudian slip?
As Ben Thompson has been shouting, it's because Apple has a very convenient definition of "tracking".