1,686 karma · joined March 27, 2007
previously: @sandboxvr (a16z), vp growth @postmates, @heyday (sold to @postmates), head of product at zynga, serious business (sold to zynga), ycombinator s08 (dropped out).
angel investor: clubhouse, amplitude, italic, pipe, +100
http://facebook.com/founder http://twitter.com/blader http://linkedin.com/in/siqic
On the other hand, if I wanted to see an aggregator site like Huffingtonpost or Digg, then I could Google for a site like that, or even Google for a keyword about a discussion that happens on the aggregator site. That seems legitimate to me, but showing up when I'm googling for something related to the original source is obviously not.
D.) Like the chorus of voices who were scoffing at MSFT's investment at $12 billion a few years back, you're not as prescient about valuations as you think you are.
Well, sure they're fads. But toys aren't a fad.
LOST might be a fad, but entertaining content aren't a fad.
Farmville might be a fad, but Zynga is in the content business, not the Farmville business.
1. Monitor your retention. Are people coming back or just checking your site out once? You can go viral very quickly but tank just as quickly once the initial interest dies down.
2. Start thinking about a business model. Highly viral sites that don't retain well could really hurt your bank account if you're not monetizing. If you can't can come up with an interesting one, throw up some ads to tide you over.
3. As soon as possible, get your database on dedicated hardware. Your bottleneck is going to be the database: so memcache, add the right db indexes (get a backup db so you can hot-swap while you do this), and add lots of RAM if needed. You don't want to be scrambling to migrate your database once you hit the limit.
"Okay, we need the new chewy coco grove coconut tree special item out by next Monday. So that means everyone's coming in on saturday."
Surprisingly accurate portrayal of actual meetings here though.
The side project was a Facebook application. It grew from about 10,000 users to more than a million from interview time to the week the season started (about a month). By the time the season started I had my doubts (along with my cofounders), but I thought I could tough it out and do both. I was wrong and made the hard choice to leave.
However, I don't feel the same way about your original response. The side project wasn't mine to share, and calling it "treacherous" takes it way too far.
Paul, I agree I should have said "we got in the second time, but I dropped out a week later". I apologize for not being clear but I don't accept that there was anything wrong with what I said.
To be clear, the side project of mine which took off was co-owned 50% by my another founder who was not involved in YC and didn't want to join, so it wasn't mine to simply share with my YC team.
There were 3 cofounders who went to the YC interview - there were 2 cofounders remaining after I left. I was transparent with both of my cofounders and we remain friends to this day - they had zero involvement in the side project from beginning to end. I specifically asked each of them if they felt I was behaving unethically - they responded that they don't believe so and would have done the same in my shoes.
You get your full investment back in a liquidation event before common stock gets paid off.
To illustrate, if LSVP was the only investor in Ning (which it isn't) at a $15MM on $750MM, then if the company gets sold for just $15MM, LSVP would still get $15MM back, and nobody else would get anything.
REE alone halved our response times and our memory usage across our Rails cluster. We're stll on mongrel/nginx.
Just curious - did you run any tests for statistical significance?
You see years of great PR, not reality. Most founding myths are the result of gross simplification and made-up mythology which the are designed to be interesting and consumable for mass media. (see Amazon, eBay, YouTube, PayPal etc).