I hope India follows suit.
305 karma · joined March 29, 2019
h s b i n d r a "at" u w a t e r l o o "dot" ca
I hope India follows suit.
However, the explanations of the second law of thermodynamics on the second page are quite decent and written in a humorous way. Of course it is not fully accurate because it does not use any math but I think it does a good enough job of explaining it to the lay person.
The explanations about human life at the third page are analogous at best. The situations that the author describes are similar to the workings of the second law but not a first principles outcome of it.
It has all the downsides of visual programming that the author mentions. The visual aspect of it makes it so hard to understand the flow of control. There is no clear left to right or top to bottom way of chronologically reading a program.
Although quite specialized, I think these things would still classify as a computer.
>Instead of treating each as exactly 7 feet, we can instead say that each is somewhere between a minimum of 6.9 feet and a maximum of 7.1. We can write this as an interval (6.9, 7.1).
Yes we can use an interval to express an uncertainty. However, uncertainties in physical measurements are a little bit more complicated.
When I measure something to be 7 plus minus 0.1 feet, what I am saying is that the value of the measured variable is not known for sure. It can be represented by a bell curve centred on 7 and 95% of the area under the curve (95% probability) that the true value lies between 6.9 and 7.1. The value of the measured variable is much more likely to be 7 than 6.9. There is also a small chance that the value lies outside of the 6.9 to 7.1 range.
In an interval, there is no probability distribution. It is more like an infinite list of numbers.
In practice, interval arithmetic is seldom used for uncertainty analysis for scientific experiments.
It will also offer the lay person insights into how the credit rating is exactly determined. They can know what is causing their rating to be less than desired and take appropriate action, instead of watching a random youtube video titled "5 ways to quickly improve your credit score".
I totally understand what you mean though. I passed on Dark Souls on my first try due to the lack of a specific goal but it is my favourite game of all time now.
Moreover, the sense of fear that I felt when I saw a dangerous looking creature was quite stronger than what I have felt playing several 'horror' games.
Unfortunately, I stopped playing when progressing became too dependent on farming and building - two things that I do not like. I would love to play an exploration only version of the game.
The problem is even more pronounced with more and more specialized and expensive equipment required for doing certain experiments.
The author mentions that this is frequently used in optimizing compilers and program analysis but does not elaborate on this statement. Can someone provide more context?
Can somebody point me towards a good review article or textbook to learn about the chemistry of the brain? Any exciting startups working in this field? Or any startups trying to come up with unconventional treatments for mental health problems?
Is my understanding correct? If yes, then why is it important to build supercomputers with more and more compute? Wouldn't it be better to build smaller systems that focus more on power/cost/space efficiency?