Eupolemos

Fair enough.

Despite the headline, it really isn't the important part. The important thing is getting rid of the mso styling.

Because that is what the Galileo project is about.

It refuses to see aliens as a silly notion and therefore it is obvious to look for archeological evidence of aliens.

Its mass/robustness was weird (very high). Its speed was also weird beyond just being high, IIRC.

Coworker next to me rides 15km to work every day. Works fine, he just bathes at work rather than at home. He always shows up with a big smile, sqeeky clean.

Also, he gets to eat more cake without getting fat. Bastard.

Nope, works fine.

According to Bolton, he believed that Trump would withdraw the US from NATO in a second term and that is what Putin was waiting for.

https://news.yahoo.com/john-bolton-putin-waiting-possible-13...

Not so, AFAIK. It is equally as much about free trade in the South China Sea.

As it has indeed turned out to be.

It is very worrying to me that China tones down the invasion in their media (if that is indeed true, I don't follow Chinese media myself).

Better to let people know what war really is. Unless you want it.

Yes.

IIRC this guy also installs some of it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJvzXVi3lAg&list=PLWNeFFHP3F...

Yes, absolutely :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJvzXVi3lAg&list=PLWNeFFHP3F...

> This is an Outlook problem, not an MJML or even an HTML problem.

Though you are technically correct, I just don't think this is a constructive attitude. Half the job of making emails is working around (Outlook) bugs. This is just the annoying world email coding.

If MJML is content ignoring Outlook bugs, MJML just isn't a satisfying tool for email makers.

Sure, it'll get the job done for some marketing, but now the developer isn't learning skills that will make robust emails beyond that.

Making robust emails becomes a completely separate skillset and the developer who chose to invest time in MJML will have to start all over learninging the necessary skills if he needs to make email you can actually reply to.

I'm remaking my workplace's transactional emails these days (order confirmation, receipt etc. for an online shop - emails customers also reply to when stuff doesn't go as expected). We want something responsive for smartphones, but are primarily a B2B company.

I made what they wanted with MJML. Looked good in a browser, gmail and phone.

Outlook had a few issues, can't remember which right now.

But replying from Outlook simply broke the styling completely. Gaps between each section, complete mess. Not the impression you want to give the customers when their order goes wrong. B2B means Outlook is what out customers use.

I've found that replying via Outlook is the ultimate integrity test of an eamil.

Now I'm making them by hand and it is a madening cargo cult bonanza. Takes a lot of time.

I guess MJML is fine for marketing.

Not really.

A lot of the cases have always been hoaxes or ignorance. Slow moving lights in the skies photographed by exited "believers".

The few remaining good cases are difficult to document. First of all, go out and take a picture of a bird. You get just one chance and it must be flying fast. Your result will not be very good. This our baseline.

Now look at the Nimitz incident. They measured a move of stationary at 80k feet to 80 feet in less than a second - something like 1200g, IIRC. 1200g is a downright silly number.

Now just take a good picture of this /s

The best current theory IMO is that this is done my manipulating/creating geodesic lines. This will create "gravity lensing" (like Einstein crosses) further blurring the craft.

Anyone serious but curios should take a look at uaptheory.com - it is good work on display by someone who understands physics and relativity.

We won't get a good picture because they move ridiculously fast.

Sure we would. It's like a tooth-gap - and there's also the issue of lacking a respected military in times that are getting a lot more... interesting.

But it feels like the UK needs to do some domestic cleanup before that has a chance of happening. Seems like the UK media and political landscape has gone completely off the rails.

Meta note:

The comment I reply to was downvoted. I don't know why, it contributes to the discussion.

Lately, I feel like there have been a lot of reddit-like dislike-downvoting here on HN.

I hope the admins find a way to preserve the "maturity culture" I have always loved about HN.

Denmark.

It is considered on par with an email sent to a wrong recipient. There might be an exception though, but it is untried in the courts, AFAIK.

No, I am not a lawyer.

I did some reasearch though, and indeed there seems to be an untried case where, if it is obvious that the owner of the data wants to keep it secret, it isn't okay. It is in danish so you'll likely need som google translate or somesuch, search for URL hacking: https://projekter.aau.dk/projekter/files/305754822/Speciale_...

But as a rule, it is on par with an email sent to a wrong recipient. https://www.version2.dk/artikel/lovraad-slaar-fast-url-hacki...

I don't know how it works "over there", but where I'm from "URL-hacking" is not considered hacking, but data publicly available.

That the police let them in makes this whole thing quite the opposite of a joke.

Yeah, vanilla CoH had "The stuff" IMO.

It was more about decissions than APM. The resouce system was very cool too.

It was super streamer friendly; any viewer could look at it for 10 seconds and understand what was going on - zero nerdiness required. And it was gorgeous for its time.

Then Relic started making a lot of mistakes:

- New factions with units a viewer would need to "learn" to be able to understand what was going on in the match.

- Introduced a super defensive faction which could fight the old defensive faction, resulting in long, abhorrently boring games.

- CoH2 which sold new mini-DLCs each month with special units purposely not balanced for online play. Top scummy.

- A plethora of other things I won't bore you with. But Relic became a customer-toxic company in my eyes.

But vanilla CoH could be examined to find gold, IMO.

You're not wrong, but... I just got a new phone - getting FF as the default and setting DDG as the default search engine had me messing around trying out all kinds of different settings and places to change stuff. It was frustrating.

So I think there are two issues here; the shortest path and the "I do this once every 2 years" path. You know, kinda like a perceived loading time.

> We must hear people out, even if they're wrong.

So, I'm going to pull out good old Harry Frankfurt here and his "On Bullshit".

If the one you debate is debating in good faith, you are right.

If the one you debate is bullshitting, you are wrong.

"Bullshitting" is not caring about true or false, but simply arguing for an effect.

If someone argues in good faith but is "wrong", hear them out. In particular, it is easy to dismiss someone who proposes horrible solutions to problems. Just realize, the problem may be very real, even if their proposed solution is horrifying.

On top of that, people will propose straight up mad solutions, if they feel nobody cares about their problems.

Just recognize that we are talking about two very different things here; bullshitting and being "wrong". And they need to be handled differently.

> held hostage by google... Its like paying a restaurant not to harass you...

This level of entitlement is just staggering. You can pay for YouTube in two ways; watch adds or pay for add free.

Now, I get that the price for watching adds right now is too high. It simply ruins most content. But your metaphors are still just way out there.

In reality there are now 3 "tiers". - Premium. Pay with money. - Get a free taste. Choose if you want it. - Unwatchable content.

I don't think that is going to work out for YouTube in the long run. But shaming people for being willing to pay for actual loads and loads of quality content is not constructive.

On the other hand, I _am_ glad if this means that random, prudish advertising companies will hold less sway over YouTube at some point in the future, where subscriptions make up a bigger part of the revenue.

No, it's the other way around. The president has to matter less means that the politicians in the houses should have more power and the president less.

The media will report on who has the power, simple as that.

Uh... I think we've all seen that China is willing to do whatever it takes to end Corona.

Dane here. This is the danish health authorities' recommendation.

If anyone thinks our government kills off >1000 farms and declares serious lockdown of a good part of our nation (no moving in and out of these counties, no going to work etc.) in a spur of the moment overreaction because of some Facebook sillyness, it is frankly getting insulting.

I'm going off the top of my head here, but you can watch Netflix in 1080p (and 4K I believe, I only have a 1440p monitor) on Edge, to see up to 1080 in chrome or FF you need an extension with 4K not being possible.

I don't know if it is a tech-issue or legal, but since it can be fixed with an extension, I guess it's tech?

As a reply to a post saying that the quote was taken out of context, providing a second quote not related to the first quote is at best unhelpful.

Or did I miss something obvious?

For the interested, no-nonsense types coming by this thread, I want to point to Harley D. Rutledge's[0] "Project Identification: The first Scientific Study of UFO Phenomena"[1][2].

He was a Ph.D. in solid state physics at the University of Missouri (at the same time as this Loring AFB story, it seems). Hearing about the nonsense of a UFO fad, he decided he'd go into the field and explain this phenomenon. He couldn't, but got a grant from a newspaper so he could spend time on this and the result was a book (Project Identification) which is pretty much a very long physics report.

He never concluded they were "spacemen" or some such, he simply observed and reported, and only used his own observations. Despite being dry, it is a very interesting read - a downright page-turner for me.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harley_Rutledge

[1]: https://www.amazon.com/Project-Identification-First-Scientif...

[2]: https://www.reddit.com/r/UAP/comments/d5gtcs/project_identif... (contains link with pdf)

> I have the DuckDuckGo privacy extensions installed in Chrome

Why not just use Firefox?

And you get to download stuff to your phone and listen with the screen turned off. YouTube has a lot of good, quirky stuff you don't find on, say, Spotify.

It is a bummer they've turned up the commercials - but then again, paying makes for a potentialy healthier ecosystem.

I use YouTube so much paying just to get rid of the "new video commercial" was a no-brainer.