7Z7

Feels like you are missing the sarcasm..

..I hope.

>As a listener, this meant I honestly felt like I had wasted a huge amount of time on the show.

That seems like such a weird conclusion to me.

>> And it's all come out AFTER the result.

>The is actually a very good point. People are acting like it was all incredibly obvious that voting Leave was a terrible thing to do. But it wasn't obvious before the vote. At least not to the average voter.

I cannot disagree with you hard enough. All of the things that are "coming out" now were refuted during the lead up to the referendum, not only by the Remain campaigners, but by the experts the Leave campaign was so clever to disqualify. The was a handful of people/companies/economists that sided with Leave, while the lion's share was solidly with Remain - and they all said it was a terrible thing to do.

How did you get to "absolute" and "all borders around the World", from "an important civil right" that we granted outselves within the regions we control?

Or just be colonised by the British at some point in your past..

>..only British citizens were asked.

I'm Irish and I voted, and my wife is from an Asian commonwealth country and she voted. Neither of us are British citizens

>No other company would have the proverbial balls to straight up copy their software either.

How can you say this looking at the hardware landscape?

Tap and hold does other things.

Can't you turn off iTunes syncing? And what is "locked filedrive"?

Whose soldiers? Whose civilians?

That's a given in either case, though.

> Perhaps it will make these people think twice.

About protecting restricted airspace?

It becomes a non-issue until the next time someone reminds you that it was because you are a woman, are Black, are gay, are whatever. Seems like it'll be a constant struggle for you until it isn't for everyone else, if you know what I mean.

Additionally it wasn't looking at broad online abuse, it was looking specifically at (according to the Guardian reporting of this study) the uses of the word "slut" and "whore" in terms of online misogyny.

That seems like the exact opposite of what the GP is suggesting.

The grandparent suggested - Alt+Backspace

On OS X, I think you can just right-click the window name and select the parent folder you want to go up to.

I think there is also a "show breadcrumbs" option in the preferences for Finder, which may or may not give more of the functionality you want.

Good news for you. John Gruber reviewed Gboard and one of his complaints in regard to the UI stylings was that "they should have gone the whole way and used San Francisco for the typeface, too."

To which Rajan Patel replied:

>"@daringfireball ..[we should go all the way w/ design]..

>applying it to herself is a PR stunt. Just like politicians drinking water from Flint or Fukushima. Though iIt may even be that she had to do it because she would not get FDA permission.

Medicine has a long history of self-experimentation:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-experimentation_in_medici...

If Android is the dominant OS (80%? of smartphones) do iOS apps have a significant impact on what Google's Apps are doing in general?

*Though I guess the fact that the Google apps are not on 100% of Android installs affects that number again.

There is a great difference between deer hunting and fox hunting, don't confuse the two. In fox hunting there is no "good clean shot".

It wasn't evidence of the law's legitimacy, it was to counter the hand wringing of the parent comment:

>the screws are being tightened on free expression over much of Western Europe these days, not least as concerns potential offense towards a certain easily offended religion

No, lots and lots of people really do hate Comic Sans, independent of use.

>admits

I don't think that's true. If the male artist had the vocabulary to express the intended sentiment, in the same way that the female artist in question was able to, I don't think there would have been the issue you raise. There may indeed have been a different issue, of appropriateness of voice, but I don't think it would have been the hate crime you claim.

When people experience the actual FoV of the Hololens they will be disappointed, because MS has engineered the demo to appear edge-to-edge.

>What decent gun owner.. >Gun owners are people.. >Does your view of gun owners differ?

There was no mention of the decency or otherwise of the hypothetical people, and it didn't read like they where intended as a moral illustration of gun owners in general. Sounds like you have a defensive agenda.

>..menacing behavior like that would be disturbing the peace or terrorism as you say.

So we can observe that some of the hypothetical people, who may or may not be gun owners, who may just be gun borrowers, are probably not, in this case, decent and probably are intending to menace.

Yeah! What have the Romans ever done for us?

I'm guessing the downvotes have nothing to do with MatLab and more to do with your choice of phrasing (regardless of your actual intent).

It reads less like you are asking a question, and more like "well yeah, duh, of course that's why they did that".

>"But Sesame Street is not for you!!! Who cares if your adult-self doesn't like Elmo?"

Lots of people weren't adults 20 years ago when Elmo was hitting his stride as the most prominent member of Sesame Street, though.