694 karma · joined November 22, 2013
How do you know it didn't just write a script that uses a chess engine and then execute the script? That IMO is the easiest explanation.
Also, I looked at the gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct example victory. One side played with 70% accuracy and the other was 77%. IMO that's not on par with 27XX ELO.
What happened to the QA testing, staggered rollouts, feature flags, etc.? It's really this easy to cause a boot loop?
To me, BSOD indicates kernel level errors, which I assume Crowdstrike would be able to cause because it has root access due to being a security application. And because it's boot-looping, there's not a way to automatically push out updates?
Since collectively we can't be bothered because we all need the newest electric vehicle, you can also accept that mass extinction is a byproduct of humanity.
The paper is paywalled, but that's the abstract.
I'm curious about how much of that is self-sabotage. I don't think we can rule out self-perception of attractiveness as a confounding variable. Internalized attractiveness? If anyone has a good study about that, I'd be very interested.
[1] https://slack.com/apps/A01EL1SR7V4-groomba [2] https://groomba.ai
Is there a study that proves this? I did a brief literature scan and it seems to me that researchers are unclear about the causation direction of things like trauma, psychological disorders, and GID/gender dissatisfaction. I think this is a pretty important part of the ongoing debate.
I don't want to be the "citations needed" guy, but I do have a tremendous respect for science and I don't want to just have to go with my gut on something like this.
I feel that it's inevitable that OpenAI et al. will be able to handle large PDF documents eventually. But until then I'm sure there's a lot of value of in this kind of pre-processing/chunking.
When you query something like "What is this research about?" is it able to use data from all chunks?
And how do you show that it is 99% accurate besides creating enough automated tests to the point that you could write the procedural version?
I think what I was missing from this article is how to evaluate a domain where neural nets or LLMs can be applied. Image-from-text generation is a great one because accuracy isn't strictly defined. However, telling ChatGPT "code this pacemaker for me" would have a real accuracy attached to it that you could confirm with unit tests.
We're offering Groomba free for your first team of users (however many people you want in a Slack channel) as we're confident Groomba can easily fit into your agile process. If not, just message us :)
This isn't like an SSRI. 25mg psilocybin isn't something you can just pop at the beginning of a workday. Your setting and "head space" matter a lot for how your "trip" (which we will now rebrand as "treatment") will go. This needs to be accounted for in future studies.