2,729 karma · joined October 9, 2010
It's not a lie though, because the truth isn't guaranteed by the mechanism that generates the answer.
And in a couple of months we might be doing things completely differently because of some new model or new framework.
That's really cool.
Edit: There's also the added complexity of running a browser against 1M pages, or more.
Teslas are disruptive - they're not what you expect of cars. I will never look the same at a car again. Tell this to anyone who doesn't understand, and they simply won't understand what you're going on about.
Over a year in; driving my Model X still makes me smile.
This can be very subjective, but code complexity metrics can help identify problem areas. I find that areas with high complexity often benefit from refactoring into smaller pieces making it more readable and self explanatory.
If you can't structure your code to explain itself, perhaps commenting isn't such a bad idea, at least it would be a record of your thoughts at the time, until someone else comes a long and hopefully cleans it up.
Well, that would make it less obvious.
1. Take a short-position on Delta on the stock exchange
2. Sabotage a piece of infrastructure that's important to operations
3. ???
4. Profit!
:)
Because Jon von Tetzchner (founder of Opera and Vivaldi) thinks having it in the browser is superior to having it as a separate app. It used to be like this in Opera as well. His goal is to provide an application with more value than just the stripped down browsers you see these days.
Because Jon von Tetzschner was and is passionate about building a good browser, and didn't really care that the odds were (are?) against him.
But when Opera is brought up, the focus is always on the Desktop browser. However, the money was always in devices - Opera has traditionally been really big on a plethora of devices.
Also, Opera both on desktop and mobile, has long been big in markets other than the US, especially eastern Europe.
I'm not an advocate of TDD though, and I agree that more effort should be put into how to test.
See the Tererê Kids Project, for instance: http://fightland.vice.com/blog/social-change-through-jiu-jit...
There's MMA, and then there's no-holds-barred (or vale tudo, literally "anything goes").
MMA in the western world today is an organized sport, with rules to protect the fighters, and has little to do with how the Gracies used to fight in Brazil. Yes, you can still find nhb events, and you can still find MMA events that are freakshows, but events like UFC, Cage Warriors, Bellator, etc. are very well organized, and fighter safety is important.
No... no, it's not. Terribly antisocial would be to have it at lunch time. Let's not make it worse than it is, 9 o'clock can be inconvenient for some, but it's not "terribly antisocial".
It's not Hibernate's fault that you eager load everything, always load entire entities when you just need a single boolean field, or loop over entity collections to aggregate values - Hibernate is just a tool, and it's the developers who are telling it what to do.
I've also worked in places where you need to have a daily session where we communicate, because there are so many different (often unforeseen) things happening.
Communicating is a necessary part of working together, and a daily standup gives everyone an arena to talk with each other - not everyone are good at communicating as much as they should be, unfortunately, and this makes everyone reflect and vocalize what they're doing ... which is a good thing.
Personally - I don't need daily standups, but development is a team effort.