311 karma · joined November 12, 2009
It takes some time to work up the spreadsheet, but they'll come to find that the high deductible+ HSA (with matching) is better for them in the long term then the PPO with lower per pay-period premiums.
But yes, if they are inclined to delve that deeply pre-employment, then it probably makes sense to have a conversation with them about why you chose what you provide as a benefit over the other options that were available.
The high cost of health care and the high follow-on cost of insurance make this a very real thing. I know I take it seriously and often get eye-rolls form across the table when I ask about it pre-acceptance.
Please rank several other languages by the same criteria so we can judge your objectivity.
I prefer "yes, if" but reality says that the "ifs" will never be made part of the planning and then blame will come back to you because you said "yes"
I find it similar to the "estimates" of when we'll finish something, that get turned into hard delivery deadlines once the project scribe commits them to the first draft of the project plan.
Management must always believe themselves to be infallible, and beyond the reproach of the rank and file. Employees who vote with their feet are 'disloyal'. Why is that? The fundamental power imbalance in the employer/employee relationship.
You're always lucky if you can find somebody who worked for a place that's hiring and can find out their opinion. Places can't fill open positions for a reason. Sometimes it's because they just won't pay. But other times, it's because they've garnered a reputation as not being a particularly good place to work. They'll just end up lowering their standards until they attract somebody in their hiring range, and then (mis)treat them just as they did their predecessor, until they too leave.
and in their managerial meetings, they'll complain about the workers.
Most admins disable VRFY these days, and rightly so.
That WP should have built-in caching, I cannot argue, but once the choice is made to use it, it becomes the chooser's problem.
I wonder if the AG will threaten AirBnB with abetting crime of conspiracy, or some other BS in order to coerce complince....
Because Forbes is a magazine that is published by billionaires, for billionaires.