tired_star_nrg

It’s funny, in oh-my-pi I’ve had much better luck with DS 4.1 Flash than GLM 5.3 flash. Glm seems to just constantly reason in circles before attempting a tool call

Where could someone learn more about the usenet account method?

This is awesome! What sort of scale options are possible? In the demo I see all MW scale loads and sources, does it also function at kW or W?

How does this impact AT Protocol? I’m just hearing about AT now, so I’m not familiar

I’m trying to figure out how they misinterpreted things to come up with that statement. Maybe they are mixing up start-up draw and constant draw? Idk

why is it asking me to sign in to read this?

I think the article stated that 8% of the respondents who said they had a “bad trip” had their trip in a clinical trial. Not that 8% of clinical trials resulted in a bad trip.

Making over ~$160k and making policy decisions

In what way are they potential civilization destroyers?

If you look at the Wikipedia for Inconel, it does actually mention that it is used as the engraving medium for black boxes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inconel

I thought that was only in Louisiana if they pass one of their new “tough on crime” laws

Invisalign actually helped my OSA a ton, that and nasal surgery for deviated septum brought my AHI from 40 down to 8.

It’s kind of ironic that the Supreme Court keeps declaring parts of the government as unconstitutional, when its own powers are not defined in the constitution. Edit: when the power of Judicial Review (to declare a law unconstitutional) was not defined in the constitution. It was a result of Hylton v United States in 1796 and Marbury v Madison in 1803

There’s a really neat book (fiction) that touches on this concept. It’s called Blindsight by Peter Watts.

Is a there a similar sort of video on how cloth for clothing is made/woven?

I use instrumental music or one song with a good rhythm on repeat. Since the song is on repeat, it doesn’t matter that there are lyrics - it all becomes part of the background rhythm.

When did we decide to start calling online multiplayer games “Games as a Service”? This feels some weird branding tactic to get investment funds to apply tech industry growth expectations to gaming

Solar energy international is a great resource for learning about solar & battery system design:

https://www.solarenergy.org/

Sorry, I’m not following. Are you saying they are able to use this now? Or that it can’t be used now?

I mean we already see the issues with international supply chains failing during covid, and we haven’t even really seen the significant impacts from climate change. Yeah, most people on HN aren’t going to really need this in the next 5-10 years as we’re predominantly in locations that will be maintained the longest. What about people in countries that already barely have functioning supply chains? This could be immediately useful for them.

Oh I’m so glad someone has already started working on something like this. This has been one of my biggest concerns for a while

Edit: Are there any easy entry points to this ecosystem for people interested in the concept but not familiar with the details? Like a competition to see who can get this up and running some set program the fastest on microprocessors found in the trash/recycling? Or what’s the most unexpected device people can get this running on?

Isn’t that what the comment you replied to is saying?

Oh wow, sounds very similar to trying to use Microsoft Access files for production at scale. Many of the same headaches with everything in a single file

Can’t see your link, it just asks me to sign into AppleConnect

I think what they’re saying is that they are a publicly traded company, therefore not “private” (privately owned)

Doesn’t look like it’s available to purchase though :(

Ok this is exactly the type of thing I was looking for. Is there work being done to open up the pool of possible hardware even further?

Every day we get closer to making this onion article a reality:

https://clickhole.com/the-future-is-here-elon-musk-stuck-a-g...

In my opinion, one of the best parts of the definition of key results is that when done right, meeting all key results should result in the objective being accomplished. If you can hit all the key results and still not have met the objective, there was an issue in the definition process.

The interesting thing is that in Measure What Matters (the Book about OKRs) they specifically call out _not_ tying bonuses and compensation to OKR results. It’s such a shame that this critical part of the methodology gets lost in the implementation.