2,834 karma · joined July 7, 2010
No. It doesn't.
Does it matter if a person with a history of DUIs (or even ONE) drives me for Lyft? Yes.
Does it matter if a person with a history of armed robbery or home invasion delivers groceries to my house for Instacart? Yes.
I wouldn't.
Personally, I'm fascinated by this. I would love to experience the jobs of others, just to learn about them and their story.
But see, in my experience, they DON'T filter you out in any way. They just keep spamming you.
I understand technical/creative recruiting is generally a "spray and see what sticks" industry, but it seems things very rarely sticks. Is there really a good enough ROI on these seemingly ineffective techniques that justifies recruiters' continued use of them?
That said, this is a genius idea for dealing with it. I truly hope the recruiters get it, but sadly, I honestly don't think they're capable of understanding how pointless their actions are.
That's great. There's nothing like getting out in the outdoors, camping, and just living a little bit. No real "purpose" other than to experience the nature around you. Kudos to you.
Once they finally come around, it will be much easier to convince people to cut the cord.
Um, am I the only one that thinks 35 engineers is a pretty good size team to get a good amount of work done?
Maybe success shouldn't be considered success unless the fit is right.
Simply filling those job openings every time does not mean the right fit is found every time.
I've had this happen to me in the past and my jaw almost dropped. Like, REALLY?
Goes to show that these recruiters are all about spray and play, and have no real logical strategies.
But I'm wondering if the recruiters you're actually trying to reach are simply never going to listen and never stop their ways. That's just not who they are.
Somebody needs to fix the recruiting industry, for realz.
So I could browse back to last week and see what my site looked like, or to my 3rd commit and see what my site looked like then.