For sure.
75 karma · joined October 8, 2013
I'm not sure what you mean, but if you mean that he mostly thought of love as childish infatuation, you can see him exploring quite a variety of other types of love in the sonnets.
No big new tech company has emerged in Oregon since the 1990s, though, and the old ones are steadily vanishing. The $8 billion sale of Wilsonville-based Flir Systems, announced Monday, leaves just two publicly traded technology companies in Oregon.
As long as they didn't watch the entire movie!
Various marketing case study blurbs are here if that's your thing: https://www.datomic.com/nubanks-story.html
I should hasten to add that I'm not an epidemiologist, so I don't know whether this is true. But my intuition suggests that even if this is just partially effective it might still be worthwhile in the context of national efforts to control the spread, which is a numbers game.
I think this is a crucial distinction between "security theater" and "hygiene theater" -- security risks are not contagious and don't have the same potential for exponential growth that virus transmission does.
Are there concrete ways you feel the article could be improved to address your points? (I'm asking out of genuine interest since you seem to know a lot about the subject.) Alternately, do you have other sources you'd recommend as a preferable introduction to the topic?
As a lay person with limited knowledge of these traditions, I didn't get the sense that the author was using axioms and derivations in a strict mathematical sense, but rather as "these are some foundational bits of epistemology in this tradition which informed further developments," for whatever that's worth.
I'd see it rather as evidence that most educational spending happens at the state and local level, not the federal level.
The only applications I can think of for text generation are malevolent ones: I'm sure it would be great at generating spam sites which can fool Google's PageRank algorithms, and it seems like you could easily use it in an information warfare / astroturf setting where you could generate the illusion of consensus by arming a lot of bots with short, somewhat convincing opinions about a certain topic.
Is there something obvious I'm missing? It seems too imprecise to actually deliver meaningful information to an end-user, so I'm frankly baffled as to what its purpose is.
Yes, the elimination of the tail call is the optimization.
FWIW, Clojure handles this through syntax, so recursive algorithms are generally implemented with loop/recur forms that don't blow up the stack (instead of having a function literally call itself): https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/loop