paulyg

If something needs that much flexibility in it's UI that people are messing with it at the last minute it doesn't belong as something people should be messing with while driving. The OP talks about HVAC controls. How much flexibility do you really need for that? The interface has been standardized for a long time. It's a known quantity both from a design perspective and user perspective. Ditto for common audio controls like volume, pause/play, skip.

The article is a bit misleading. They talk about how many AC induction motors there are and how much power they consume. I don't doubt those numbers. But the vast majority of those are synchronous: they run at a set speed.

What they are working on is variable speed motors which need a special "drive" (aka VFD) device to convert the constant 50 or 60 Hz power supply to a variable frequency. Now VFDs are getting more common as simply using a VFD can make big efficiency gains on a process. But VFDs are still not the norm yet.

Its supersonic shock waves. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shock_diamond

It won't help Joe Six-pack. And your questions make me think you did not read the article. The manufacturing output will increase due to automation & other improved techniques.

My fave quote from the article:

> So while it's understandable the state of manufacturing is of concern to presidential candidates, those who say they can bring back lost jobs in the sector either don't know what they are talking about, or are being disingenuous.

I agree pumped hydro is good, but there are only so many places you can site it.

> Which is why hydrocarbons produce less CO2 per watt than coal.

No. It has nothing to do with water. Coal is a hydrocarbon as well. It has to do with the type of hydrocarbon chains.

It is true that nuclear power is bad at peaking. That's why no one uses them for that. They are good at base-load power, which is where they are used.

Use the right tool for the job. Different sources of energy have different upsides and downsides and we should take advantage of those. Use wind and solar (possibly backed by batteries) and natural gas as peak load generation because they are good at that. And use nuclear as the base load.

I agree with the premise floated by the 1st expert in the article that we are not rewarding nuclear for its carbon free generation. The reason utilities are closing nuclear plants are because of the deregulation of electric power and creation of power supply "markets". Nuclear has to compete on price alone against cheap natural gas and subsidized renewables (not only are the fuel sources of those cheap, so are the capital costs compared to nuclear).

Re your PS, are you saying that hydrogen atoms in coal DO NOT combine with oxygen to create water during combustion? Because my college education and career as a mechanical engineer taught me otherwise.

Lower gas prices certainly did not help, but if not for regulations introduced during the Obama administration, many coal plants would still be running. I worked, as an engineer, for a company that made equipment pretty much just for coal fired power plants from 2002-2014. Starting with the ammendments to the Clean Air Act in 2009, then the CSAPR, then MATS, we watched utility after utility make the decision to close plants rather than install the required emissions control equipment. So maybe if natural gas was more expensive they would have chosen to install the equipment, but if not for those regulations they would have just kept running.

Yes I know how all that works becuase I worked in the utility industry for over a decade.

My point was (1) when comparing peakers vs storage you need to consider the cost of: Off-peak generation + storage cost vs peaker cost. (2) This wasn't a cost driven thing. This is a demand driven thing.

Why are people comparing and debating "batteries vs combustion turbines"? Batteries only store energy and you still need to generate it somewhere. Probably from a CCGT plant.

And it's not risk aversion. Its buried subtly in the article but part of SoCal's gas infrastructure is shut down because of the leak. They literally can't provide enough gas to generate enough electricity for peak demand. So they will generate over capacity at night, store in the batteries, and discharge during the day.

Also what seems to be lost here is that Tesla created it's utility battery products as a renewables play, but are just taking advantage of extra-ordinary circumstances in this case.

Your mention of Alibaba made me think of something. I believe the electrical manufacturing world is much more globally integrated than the mechanical world. I say that as a practicing mechanical engineer. A resistor, capacitor, chip are the same in US, Europe & China. On the mechanical side all have different material standards and industrial standards.

And here is the US's disadvantage there, we are still on an island when it comes to that stuff. Sure you can get some metric nuts and bolts here (in US steel grades). But try buying European grade steel here (nigh impossible). Try getting an EN (nee DIN) or JIS flange here (do-able but lots of calling around). Try finding an engineer competent in the PED or machinery directive.

In Europe and Asia they can get US materials and make to our standard and sell to us. But its much harder and more rare to make products here and sell them to Europe and Asia. Usually you are making a US product, and "proving equivalency" with the European and Asian standards.

Wecome to mechanical engineering folks.

This. I took Calc 1 twice. First time was during the day in a big auditorium style classroom. The prof had a pompous attitude, like he didn't even want to be there. I dropped the class mid-term. I re-took it in the evening. Smaller class size, mostly "non-traditional" students. Prof was awesome. Frequently stopped the lesson to re-explain things and made sure everyone was understanding, stayed after class to help students. Because of that class I actually "got" calculus.

What all the non mechanical engineers don't realize is the bend allowance is different for types of material (steel, aluminum), grade or strength (high tensile steel will stretch less than mild carbon steel), and even the tool (mandrill vs brake bender). Software like Solidworks and Inventor come with default values. You need to know to go in and change them based on your circumstances.

Yup. This. I have a kettle. Boiling water for tea in 2-3 minutes. But if I run it and the microwave at the same time it trips my 20 amp breaker. :(

SharePoint is really good for shared files. But that is what it was created for. It is called Microsoft Office SharePoint. If you turn on Publishing Pages you can make is work as in intranet portal. But you have to work at it, there is a bit of friction involved in doing something as seemingly simple as making a webpage. The issue tracker/tasks feature is... "usable". I wouldn't use SharePoint for anything else than those features.

P.S. I've been involved in rollouts (as a subsite admin, not IT) of SP2007 and SP2013.

This is also what Composer (package manager for PHP) did. They ported openSUSE's libzypp to PHP to solve the dependency management problem. After resolving versions the dependencies are installed in a flat list.

I don't understand how people connect oil and gas imports to electricity generation. Go read this article http://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/power-plants...

Now how much electricity is generated from oil in the US? A whopping 1%.

Now while it is true that we import a lot of natural gas... "Natural gas imports to the United States, 98% of which arrive via pipeline from Canada, have decreased almost every year since 2007, and in 2014 reached the lowest level (2,636 Bcf) since January 1995." According to http://www.eia.gov/naturalgas/importsexports/annual/.

So if you think putting solar on your roof, or wind, is going to make any OPEC countries upset please think again.

It was towards the end of the article:

"The petrol engine is optimally sized to provide the cruise power at its most efficient operating point, resulting in an improved fuel efficiency overall."

The fact that an airplane's speed and power delivery is much more steady state than a car's is the other big reason this has not been attempted until now.

They are also glazing over the fact that the system uses millions of gallons of water per year.

I've seen plenty of pictures on the internet of supercars sliced in half and burned after crashes at that kind of speed. For example the Paul Walker crash. From the picture of the Honda I assume the Tesla broadsides the Honda whiched caused it to spin, slide, and strike the pole.

Gas turbines are around 35% efficient in simple cycle but combined cycle plants are pushing 60% efficiency.

That plant broke ground before Fukushima. How many permits have been issued since then: 0. Perfectly good nuclear plants like Vermont Yankee have been shut down (decided not to renew operating license) due to "concerned citizens. We were headed to a nuclear power renascence until that accident happened and took the wind out of the sails.

Look at Germany and Canada (specifically Ontario). Not so good.

And that is the reason why all coal burning plants are being required to retrofit with equipment to capture mercury and other toxic metals (along with retrofits for SOx and NOx). But that is not good enough.

I agree with your assessment. To me the reason we keep ping-pnging between the two extremes is a lack of standardized and common caching mechanism. In a perfect world every web server would be behind an HTTP reverse proxy and we could just use HTTP headers to control caching. But there are a lot of quirks to that so unless you control the whole stack you don't have a proxy out front. And then you get into all other kinds of caching schemes: filesystem, memcache, redis, s3/cloudfront, etc. Which one you choose is determined by your tech stack, your PaaS, etc. Which the CMS creators have limited control over. If caching was a no brainer CMS creators could just concentrate on making the dynamic part good.

This years F1 cars are brake by wire. It let's them control the kinetic energy recovery better.

I jump between Creole and Markdown and this seems like an interesting mashup. Though I don't like all the choices made. I have been thinking lately about just combining Creole and Markdown into one master markup lang.

The one thing I really like in Skriv is the ability to assign CSS classes to paragraphs or divs. That is something I have wanted in an abbreviated form for a while. I wrote an extension to do this in my own Creole parser but most of the time I am using someone else's or writing in Markdown so I can't use the syntax.

Your meter will read lower though. Nest gets signal to implement demand response. Nest sends signal to all participants to up temp setpoint by 3deg. Homeowner uses less electricity. Meter spins slower.

I agree that there would be economies of scale to saving up energy at off peak times for use on peak. But the only way I know of this happening on the MW scale is pumped storage. Utility pumps water up into a reservoir all night and then let's it back down through Hydroelectric generators the next day. But the ability to do this is limited by geography. Maybe we are at a turning point. The island of Ohau recently put out an RFQ for a large energy storage system. Will be interesting to see if and who bids.

OpenERP is still leagues above the million dollar paid apps of Oracle and SAP. I'm not saying you are wrong. Just how bad this particular segment of software is. It is wripe for disruption.