indrex

Yes that solve the knowledge part but there are also steps I need to repeat. Example: how to run a code based on risk level. That requires a tool, not just text.

Are your projects standalone? Because why I need tooling is to carry over the learning and knowledge from one project to next.

How they go down globally? All regions use the same infra?

I had to setup hooks just to catch the and ban them in the CLIs. Most of what Claude writes is simply un-readable.

Topical - that’s the problem to solve for orbital data centers

Had similar experience with GCP. Terminated VMs six times, and responded zero times.

I stopped mostly after Claude Code. 1. Too many interesting things to do 2. I asked it to rate my diet and maintain a streak - which now I don’t want to lose

…and the first paragraph has an em dash

I thought so too. But I would rather use docstrings and comments because: - Readable by LLMs/others in the context of the code - Searchable - Version controlled

I develop AI for a living and I don’t understand the internals of it either, just as I don’t understand the internals of Intel architecture. My job is to build, not to fit information into my mind.

Plenty of (valid) criticism in the comments, but I appreciate the developer for publishing it.

At first glance this seems to be a run of the mill clustering project. Why is it on the HN front page? Am I missing something?

When I first started coding, I wished there was an “app” for it where I just start writing code. Now there is.

Or just use a cellular watch like Apple Watch Ultra instead of carrying a phone with you all the time.

Perplexity is big enough to be named in Bloomberg?

This proves it won’t take much to simulate reality.

I sort of use Apple Watch as a small phone when I don’t want to lug around the iPhone