ilostmyshoes

Assuming you're talking about the Chinese cultural revolution, not sure what that has to to with the topic at hand?

My personal experience tells me that reactionaries literally are scared. Scared of change and things they don't understand. Probably a controversial opinion but oh well

Where insulting someone is causing harm to another, is taking a medication going to harm someone?

I've also personally seen a pattern in low score reviews on Amazon or other shopping sites where the person leaving the low score just simply didn't understand how to use the item properly, in some cases this is a majority of the bad reviews.

Another is when they had a problem with something external to the item itself such as shipping.

Flexibility to change things without massive costs maybe?

Honestly it's the same in the US. But unfortunately the ones who fund the political campaigns are usually the ones with the lower tax rate, so that doesn't change.

But why did they try it

Again, middle class is a concept invented by capital owners to keep the working class fighting amongst themselves. If you depend on a wage to survive, you are a worker

Working class is defined as those who must sell their labor in order to survive. If you cannot live off income of your investments alone and must work for a salary then you are a worker, you are working class

Save costs to protect profits

Not to mention the lab testing. No longer do I wonder if I'm smoking mold

All that means is that it's better at stringing together words than you are

How could one possibly harm their reputation by using a legal medication

Or they've read up on anthropology, this is common knowledge in the field

If you can quit your job and live purely off your investments then you are a capital owner, if you cannot do that without adjusting your lifestyle you're working class

That was a story made up by capital owners to keep the working class fighting amongst itself. The reality is that anyone who works for a wage is being taken advantage of

We are all workers, we are the working class whether we are educated or not.

The capital owners want the working class to fight amongst themselves because it allows them to continue enriching themselves off the backs of the working class.

Even if you own some stocks or have a 401k, if you depend on a salary to pay your bills then you are a worker

I do the same and even then you need to be careful about the astroturfing on reddit

corporatism is everywhere and infecting the web to enrich a few at the expense of everyone else

What they don't seem to be talking about is learning from indigenous farming communities who use things like diversity in crops and rotation to keep soil quality high. These problems were solved decades ago, just not by the industrial farming community

I don't agree that homicide is the best for comparison, the original claim was about crime in general

Well I guess first do you have any sources for the more crime per capita claim?

Secondly, other countries seem to manage to do police work without killing a ridiculous number of citizens, so that's definitely kinda weird

Police work = killing people?

This is the answer. Someone may go in with the best of intentions but are quickly and easily molded by the president

The entire saying is "a few bad apples spoils the bunch"

The "bad department" is the US when you compare it against the rest of the planet

https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2020/06/05/policekillings/

We already have the highest prison population of any country on earth, why would you think the solution is building more prisons?

Humans are able to connect words to abstract ideas rather than simply what words go next to each other

It depends on the circuit being stimulated but yes there is usually some sort of adaptation with enough exposures to a stimulus over a period of time. Long enough breaks can prevent it though

Not linear but comparable

Language and understanding abstract ideas is a bit more complicated than chess

While it does give some accurate summaries I noticed that it uses terms incorrectly. I can see this being a decent tool for finding papers but definitely not for creating accurate summaries, especially for use without in depth review. It's basically a 50/50 shot

How long after the chess computers of the 60s did it take to beat a human?