It's much more likely that you're creating websites that fail accessibility guidelines and that many people are forced to zoom in to read.
100%/16px is standard for article body copy.
525 karma · joined September 16, 2010
100%/16px is standard for article body copy.
Has any software produced by Samsung ever made you say "I wish I could use more of this"? Touchwiz?
I worked with a company that was halfheartedly pitched a couple of demo hardware units last year running Tizen 1.0 for evaluation purposes - they wanted HTML5-based games and apps to bundle with the system or feature prominently on what I assume is an upcoming app store. I wasn't impressed with its broken JS support at the time and didn't look into what it would have taken to rewrite the games to run properly on the platform, but maybe they've come a long way since then?
Gazelle and Amazon present almost zero risk to the seller, hence the price differential.
I don't think anyone was under the impression that Pincus was personally invested in any of his company's products, but I think this is still a telling anecdote, similar to cultural problems most recently corrected by Marissa Mayer at Yahoo, for example.
This page fails that contrast guideline algorithm (258 out of a minimum suggested 500) and is a little annoying to read even for someone without a sight/color deficit.
You do have a good point that touches on the dilemma of the internet archivist, but this is certainly a problem easier to solve than the ones faced by people attempting to preserve software or video games, for example.
Twitter also doesn't give a fuck about archival via screenshots. I'm pretty hard-pressed to imagine who would, actually.
The idea of someone profiting from the trademark or patent of an idea because they 'thought of it first' may be abhorrent to you, but it's the way this patent system works. I think it's also important to distinguish between companies that think of ideas, then implement them, thus innovating in product; and companies who simply patent the ideas and use them to sue. We call those "patent trolls".
It's certainly possible that similar end results can be achieved independently - that is what a court is determining, in this case.
Seems like a great deal for Bailey, who was probably able to buy SR back with the interest on the money from the prior sale. Best of luck to Playerize with the platform.
The title looks factually accurate to me.
In general, this is a process best curated manually, with a maximum on converted file sizes and hand-picking images that are "must-haves" for the initial page load.
I think anyone with hardware or Android game development experience should be healthily skeptical of the tall promises and minimal explanation coming out of this Kickstarter. I love a good chunk of optimism as much as the next guy who loves games, but the fervor seems to really be distorting reality and setting up an inappropriately adversarial tone to these HN discussions.
I don't think that has anything to do with the results in this paper.