bejelentkezni

I think it's more of a "people are getting tired of internet DIY projects that require thousands of dollars of tooling and existing materials."

I think you are confused about how Hacker News works. I have only ever made three submissions, and a dozen or two comments. You can't get fourth from either of those.

I think a lot of this in general is a simple matter of the population itself getting older, with the nobel prize bit being compounded by the fact that today's problems are orders of magnitude harder than yesteryear's problems.

One must remember that most companies are not tech companies. Java is still very comfortable in boring LAMP-stack E2E firms.

Response: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Recession#ATTENTION_NEW_V...

Unless I'm mistaken, Micron and Texas Instruments have their own foundries as well.

That's not foresight, it's out-of-hand speculation. But I guess people who don't wildly speculate would never invest in crypto in the first place, heh.

Yep. People have been banging the drum on TPMs and similar security chips being the end of personal computing for about 18 years now. Still waiting.

For what it's worth, the guy who maintains GNU ed and wrote lzip says you should not do that[0].

0. https://www.nongnu.org/lzip/xz_inadequate.html

Gotta love articles written about papers that haven't been published yet, journaled by someone who thinks a superposition is two states at once.

The most basic and implicit prediction you can make is "if I do this again I'll get the same result."

A little odd that it's adjusted for age but not wealth, which surely matters more.

Debian's images are not Secure Boot signed. You made that up.

This sounds like a great way to quickly deplete most of your vitamins and minerals.

>So many doctors are completely ignorant of risks of antibiotics and other meds.

Not ignorant, complicit.

>If you don't pull the lever, you're not responsible for what happens, at least in my opinion.

I disagree. I think there's some point at which minimal effort from you for appreciable reward for others puts an obligation on you. And that's precisely the reason the trolley problem is so popular.

You can use NAT6 if you insist but there's no reason to. The aforementioned privacy extensions keep you from being tracked long-term based on address alone and your firewall is still blocking incoming traffic.

What is that supposed to mean?

It got a brand-new filesystem a couple years ago.

The article basically says that you have to read the Bible to understand why you think the way you do about anything because you live in a country with a history of having a majority-Christian population. I disagree. Most people's ethical frameworks are very simple and are usually just least-harm principles with a little window dressing. And insofar as they aren't, they are usually not particularly compatible with secular society. For my part I don't see the need to give special attention to a particular ethical text just because so many other people have for so long.

I'm surprised the title was so literal. I think what people really need is guidance on how to migrate away from the Google ecosystem in general before they actually need to go hunting for the "delete account" button.

Yet another extension that could as easily be and indeed already is a userscript.

If you are maxing retirement funds you are not living paycheck to paycheck.

Do you reckon polarized glasses would have helped? Even if they're color graded or something, those photos are probably using polarized lenses.

I must say I am mildly amused that the author went to the effort to specify six SKUs based on size when the largest is only 10% larger than the smallest. And this approaches 0% as you add content to your wiki. But I always love seeing some blazing-fast web pages!

Wouldn't that just lead to everyone going to the fields for 1 day and coming back for their check?

What do you anticipate being the problem? I have several single-letter commands myself.

The duality of man[0].

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30952583

Haven't AMD and Intel had to share all their patents with each other for the past 20 years anyway? I remember some agreement coming out of the ashes of the amd64 debacle. And the patent text doesn't seem to have anything to do with the images.