Oil companies scramble to find workers despite boom
reuters.com
reuters.com
Half of my ex colleagues had to drive Uber to make ends meet for years. I remember a reservoir engineer walking down the main street in the oil city I worked in with a board saying "qualified petroleum engineer will work cheap".
I spent 4 years (and $$$) doing a master's of petroleum engineering whilst working full time. None of the 40 odd students I went through the degree with got jobs due to an industry downturn and all left the industry. We happened to graduate during a low oil price period. Too bad. So sad. 4 year degree down the drain.
This affliction of no staff happens every boom, and the mass layoffs and industry exodus happens every bust. If the industry actually planned for this cyclical nature by avoiding overexpansion in good times and reducing mass layoffs in bad times this wouldn't be an issue.
I think that advice holds surprisingly well for most startups too. If only they followed it.
>We're pivoting to software
proceeds to furlough the engineers every winter
>Why does everyone with skills keep leaving?
I obviously think the solution is to pay more, but money has decreasing worth and having a significant other/friends/family near you is something that only feels more important the more money you have in the bank.
It's not a simple problem for sure. Wonder how sites like Drillr (rig gig workers) are doing.
I wonder if salaries have changed since then.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jun/18/marathon-pet...
Also, please don't argue via linking obnoxious TikTok-style videos. If you have a point, make it yourself.
https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/XOM/exxon/profit-m...
That will never happen of course.
Though I do wonder by you believe "they could simply pay more"
[1] https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/walmart-truck...
This is for the Walmart fleet though, that Walmart trailer that almost took you out last week was most likely driven by one of the outside companies that run dedicated for them and they for sure aren’t as strict on who they hire.
There are RNs making less than that.
Labor seems to be one of the few things where supply and demand dont apply.
Happy to be wrong.
I don't understand this. From my perspective, the labor market in the United States today is possibly the best example of supply and demand mechanics.
At the low end, the market is directly supported by welfare programs. In the middle, supply friction is distorted by health insurance. There are meaningful market forces at play at the upper echelon, but it’s more a social market than tied to actual business outcomes.
However, discussion to this point notwithstanding, I still believe it's the most exemplary mechanic of supply and demand today.
It’s the only supply and demand metric he ever describes.
It was generalized into everything is a market, with jargon cottage industry springing up around everything; market is a hammer, and we pound nails.
> We're competing against Amazon hiring drivers
Nobody wants to work* now amirite??
*Nobody wants to work at your shitty oil rig in the middle of the ocean for peanuts
“We can’t find people!” “They all quit within a few months!” Not crap, it’s a hard job (welding inside a giant metal tank, etc) and the pay is good but not great. Even at a 10% premium, you’d be hard pressed to get people to take this job over driving for UPS (for example). Still physically hard, but more regular hours, union job, pay is decent, etc. And compared to just about any office job? No competition - most would pick the lower paying office job because it probably has A/C, more vacation, and roughly equivalent health care.
It has turned the relation to no longer be mutually beneficial, instead entirely asymmetrical. And all this while we're still expected to nod and be "loyal". After all, where else might we go? That question has been the basis for the abuse.
But there's a new answer now. We do go. And don't come back. Poetic justice. Make good use of it.
The layoff, rehire cycle is a clear demonstration of how management wants to have their cake, eat it too, succeeding at it for a short time and then complaining that they can't find any workers.
But no one was laid off. All that happened was that one guy who had temporarily left to finish a master's degree wasn't rehired as expected (I think it also didn't help that he wasn't that good).
The level of disconnection some folks have for the life experiences of others is astounding at times.
For the record, I 100% do not concede this point.
Also I spent my early years as a pipe welding man in Oklahoma, so if you think you speak for some kind of fuel-producing working class I am here to inform you otherwise.
The lazy conclusion that you can just throw money at a problem and make it go away is just that. Those people need to be retrained and will need support as they are retrained, 100k isn't going to touch that. I wasn't speaking for anyone, just a long standing belief I've had about most blue collar jobs that people want to elimate. I said the same thing when Hillary Clinton said something equally as callous to coal miners.
Passive-aggressive "do something for the sake of doing something" legislation is harmful as it makes the law unclear, enables regulatory capture, and foments the current litigious landscape that only makes lawyers rich.