HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

aquarium87

50 karma · joined November 30, 2022

submissionscomments
aquarium87··on Ask HN: How long until AI shows general intelligence without failures?
Judging by the human programmed biases inherently designed into AI,. Maybe never.

Humans can't agree on very basic facts, ergo, humans will never agree with AI. Just like factchecking is weaponized, AI is weaponized to disregard the truth.

The internet is BARELY a coherent reflection of humanity as is, with all kinds of input biases to the datasets, including political and social.

ChatGPT now means the internet has crossed the Rubicon, and will reflect humans and life and reality less and less and less as the feedback loops intensify and the datasets increasingly become infected with AI data parsed from flawed human data sets.

I'm just not sure any general intelligence AI can be created when it simply doesn't stand a chance of having a neutral dataset to train on.

Pre AI Internet is best. But even this is a falsehood. The pre-AI Internet has relics of censorship, state sponsored propoganda, and is skewed toward young people who are inherently not not world wise or intelligent.

General purpose AI promises to be better than us, but if we can't program it with honest datasets, it will always reflect our flaws.

And I don't believe there is such a thing as an objective dataset.

aquarium87··on Musk Is Pulling the Plug on a Tool That Made Twitter Great
This kind of data is constantly abused, and tied to private data via games/ads/etc.

Someone has to pay the bills, and advertisers need to be relieved of their power.

The complaints about killing hobby bots are fine, but serious, its $100 a month. Most of these researchers, academics, get rich quick data bros etc SHOULD pay for access to all this data. Users generate it, and then get abused by advertisers in return, while API wielding bros get everything for free without giving back or being abused? Naw. Users generate content, those exploiting the data can pay their fare share. They probably hammer the datafuck out of twitter all the time as well. Probably for garbage reasons like getting an alert within ten seconds of someone posting so they can spam ideological Messages within 60 seconds. I'm thinking krassenstein bros etc.

aquarium87··on Merck Covid Drug Linked to New Virus Mutations, Study Says
https://archive.is/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2...

Nice non-denial that this is a massive tail risk, without proper study. They admit it is causing variants, but deny the varients are "problematic".

Then go on to state, pedantically, that their is no "evidence" that their drug has contributed to any current or previous strains in circulation.

Then, based on "available" data, (read: there is no data), do not believe it will "contribute" to future variants.

All of that word salad to acknowledge they are playing a massive game, purposefully speeding up evolution by introducing mutations, while pretending its perfectly safe because it hasn't fucked us yet.

It hasn't fucked us yet because we haven't tried this yet.

I'm done with this timeline crap. I've watched politicians drag out scandals until they lose steam, and we all watched phizer and moderna and us government use inappropriate timelines to create false narratives about safety and effectiveness.

Maybe people should wake up and start pushing back on statements made on illegitimately short timelines.

"Merck disputes the view that its drug is causing problematic variants. “There is no evidence to indicate that any antiviral agent has contributed to the emergence of circulating variants,” Merck spokesman Robert Josephson said in an email in response to questions about the study. “Based on available data we do not believe that Lagevrio (molnupiravir) is likely to contribute to the development of new meaningful coronavirus variants.”"

aquarium87··on Harvard Misinformation Expert Joan Donovan Forced to Quit by Kennedy School Dean
Seems like the flavor of the day is out of style. All these fake advocacy groups being weaponized and exposed, better to get ahead of the game and shut it down before they put out more work products that will not hold up well in the post Trump era.

Just look at Hamilton 68. Most of these "disinformation" rackets are simply information warfare units, carrying out the bidding of one ideology.

aquarium87··on Meta shares rocket 25%, on pace for the best day in a decade
Seems like the analysts think Meta isnt a dirty brand to be avoided at all costs.

Personally, I see an abusive relationship getting worse and worse. The customers run, the business cuts expenses, the customers are now subject to more automation and anti-humanness, Meta enters a deathstruggle for control of VR/AR with Apple and loses. Facebook is already irrelevant, and getting more so by the day.

At least Apple makes their money mostly on hardware and software, not ads. Systemically, this beats Meta every time, in a fair fight.

I want to see the single day drop in Meta stock when Apple unveils its AR/VR platform and hardware.

aquarium87··on How to Finance Buying Pizza
Actually, on second reading, I take it all back. This line is ambiguous and technically makes the user responsible for "all" fees, which presumably includes fees to the service provider. Even more shady is these fees aren't stated

"If charges cannot be processed through your debit or credit card, or if your bank draft or electronic funds transfer is returned for insufficient funds, you will be responsible for any fees incurred and Zip will have no liability with respect thereto."

As a reasonable human, I read this to mean no fees paid to the service provider.

As a proficient reader, this means the user is agreeing to paid undisclosed fees.

Is this an example of over broad TofS turning away customers, or TofS designed to screw over customers?

aquarium87··on How to Finance Buying Pizza
I give this service an A rating. It has low fees, comparatively. Make payments on time = good service.

As for when someone doesn't make a payment, they reserve the right to retry as many times as they want at arbitrary intervals like every single day.

What I am giving credit for is that although the user may rack up NSF fees from their banks, the user will NOT rack up fees from the credit provider, as far as I can see from the TofS.

Relevant selections from TofS:

Debit and Credit Card – Payments made by debit and credit card will be subject to the terms and conditions established by the card issuer. If charges cannot be processed through your debit or credit card, or if your bank draft or electronic funds transfer is returned for insufficient funds, you will be responsible for any fees incurred and Zip will have no liability with respect thereto.

(c) You are responsible for ensuring that you have sufficient funds in your bank account or available via your Card on File to make Automatic Payments on the dates specified in your Billing Schedule. To the extent permitted by applicable law and in accordance with any other agreement provided to Zip authorizing Zip to debit your Card on File, you authorize Zip to satisfy any monetary liability you owe Zip by: (i) debiting your preferred Card on File on file with Zip at a later time or date; (ii) debiting any other Card on File of which you have provided details; or (iii) any other legal means.

(e) You agree that you grant authorization to Zip to make the transfers from any of your bank account(s), debit card(s) and/or credit card(s) to fulfill a missed or late payment and any associated fees. You give Zip the right to resubmit any transaction you authorized that is declined, dishonored or returned for insufficient or uncollected funds or any other reason.

You also agree that if you fail to pay any amount owed to Zip pursuant to this Agreement, Zip may engage in collection efforts to recover such amounts from you. These collection efforts may involve contacting you directly, submitting your information to a collections agency, or taking legal action. We may report information about this Agreement to credit bureaus. Late payments, missed payments, or other defaults on this Agreement may be reflected in your credit report.

aquarium87··on Cars are rewiring our brains to ignore all the bad stuff about driving
"One of the things you notice if you spend your career trying to get people to drive less"

Set, setting, context, this guy is not grounded. He is a self admitted ideolog.

The questions posed and the answers give more insight into this guys biases than anything else.

For example, he posits, though doesn't clearly say, that smoking and driving are equally dangerous or at least should be considered equally bad. The respondents set him straight, that no, car exhausts killing people is not the same as second hand smoke killing people.

Being the ideolog that he is, he takes that as a defect of the respondents, not his worldview. He then proceeds to tar and feather people for personal and professional prestige by taking his personal fault as a rabbid environmentalist and projecting it onto the 2300 respondents, slandering their "cultural inability to think objectively and dispassionately"

aquarium87··on Lowe's pioneers system to solve organized retail crime
Interesting. What happens when the owner forgets, passes away etc and the tool needs to change owners? Seems like there is a customer service tax that would need to accompany this, otherwise its as easy as a hard reset. And if no hard reset, tools become garbage.

User forgets email address or loses access to email address?

I think it would take a lot of work to "do the job right"

aquarium87··on D.C. free bus bill becomes law as zero-fare transit systems take off
I knew a woman in DC who was late for work because a guy tried to get on the bus, was denied entry because he couldnt/wouldn't pay, and so he pulled out a gun and shot the bus driver dead. She wasn't even phased. This was about 15 years ago.

Proof of fare is better than having transit employees be the enforcers. Free is even better, theoretically.

But be wary, transit in DC may turn into moving homeless encampment as there is no real way to tell someone they can't stay on the bus all day

aquarium87··on Jewish family fleeing the Nazis sold a Picasso in 1938. Their heirs want it back
First off, the article fails to say what price was paid for the art to enter the family, and fails to say what it was worth when it was sold back. It only states the final selling price, and that it was gifted to the museum. This is a red flag. The truth has been deliberately obscured, presumably, to further a narrative.

The family alleges it is worth $100-200 million, leading the reader astray as to how much a just compensation would be.

For example, if the painting was worth $3000 when it sold for $1500, then the logical conclusion is they recieved half value and maximum compensation would be maybe $75 million.

If the painting was worth $15,000, it becomes less relevant.

Then there is the question of what a quick cash sale is worth, especially when it means the survival of a family. What if the purchaser simply didn't have the capital and made a good faith offer to save the lives of a family he knew?

It seems far more appropriate to sue the Nazi government, or whoever is now responsible for the Nazis actions.

This precend, if successfully implemented, could come back to kill millions in the future as noone will liquidate goods at any cost knowing they can't keep them. Ergo, those fleeing prosecution won't be able too.

Perhaps the family should take the L, be thankful their family tree still exists, and take one for team Judaism and not set any highly dangerous precedents. Especially considering that history informs us it is most likely to be Jews who would be a victim to said precedent in the future. I don't believe we are post-history for one second.

I know this doesn't sound empathetic enough and will get a bazillion down votes, but such is life.

aquarium87··on Sugar and Fat Trick the Brain into Wanting More Food
Pretty good article. I thought maybe the title was off or clickbaity as I have always associated eating fat with fullness and weight loss. There is no meal in the world that leaves me feeling satisfied like I imagine slender people feel than about 20oz of high fat beef.

I recognize after this article its not necessarily about how the body feels, because the mouth rewards are separate. Also, I challenge anyone to try to physically overeat on ribeye. It can be done, but it's pretty painful and masochistic. It's probably the only experience I've had where it's almost painful to eat. The Jaws don't want to chew, the brain screams no as the steak is being cut, the stomach; relatively empty in comparison, feels bursting.

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that at least for me, in the presence of lots of fat and absence of sugar, the body's chemicals far supercede the brains.

With sugar/carbs.... Hahah. Not a chance. That's why I'm fat

aquarium87··on Sam Bankman-Fried’s latest defense is utterly unconvincing
I think he does. And he isn't stupid. He has the potential (due to lack of accounting) to move the needle on when the company is deemed officially financially insolvent. Maybe not, but I think with all the money he has given out, if he can work the narrative and advance the claim that FTX was financially solvent after it actually was, he can keep A LOT of money in a lot of powerful pockets, do 15 years, and be back at it again by age 45.

The choke-point for making this happen is one of several decision makers in the DOJ. Decisions on what to charge (discretion as to what can be proven), decisions to appeal or not, personnel decisions as they relate to competencies and duties, decisions about requests for help and information from other 3 letter agencies, etc etc etc.

It only takes one thumb at one critical juncture to get this guy off with 15 years.

aquarium87··on Brazil fines Telegram for not suspending far-right congressman’s account
Credit where credit is due. These types of issues need to be brought to their logical conclusion in a public way. Your insinuating the Supreme Court Justice is a dictator is fine and well, but only by Telegram standing up and fighting this will be become informed. Some people think Brazil is a democracy, and maybe it is, but more like an Iranian Khomenian Democracy.
aquarium87··on Think power is expensive now? Just wait until we need security guards
Stating that an electric bill is 40% delivery charges and fees isn't an argument. Nor is taking one very small part of the infrastructure, making the claim that small part will go up because "insert ecoterrorist conspiracy theory here and use buzzword like reichstagg" useful.

There is barely money to rebuild the grid green, and half of the culture war people that you accuse me of being say there isn't even that. There isn't money to protect against non-conspiracy events like massive solar flares. There simply isn't money to protect against terrorism.

Spending money to protect against terror attacks that are rag tag Goonies and can be dealt with by life sentences and cameras is not going to happen. There are many many other SYSTEMIC dangers that take precedence, like solar flares and overcapacity. The only systemic issue that terrorists can influence is hack attacks. And those don't require guards or physical barriers. They require cyber warfare, minimal physical hardening, and already existing and paid for by government spy networks.

In other words, security costs are not going to be the driver of high energy prices. Investing in green infrastructure to burn clean natural gas to get 60% efficiency, degraded by about 10% for transmission and 10% for battery storage (60.9.9) in order to replace ICE engines is the driver of costs with government mandated new EV sales requirements.

With everyone switching to EVs, batteries will become a necessary part of the cost of electricity in the future as well, and even if the cost of manufacturing drops, the price of investing in the raw materials will increase until miracle battery tech comes out, or Elon mines an asteroid.

We are fast entering a world where generation costs are going to skyrocket, and batteries manufacture and recycle costs will drop to unimaginably low levels, whereby the end result is batteries are for the rich and middle class and considered an investment as the materials inside are precious, and useable forever with a recycling and rebuilding phase every X years.

I expect to be investing $50,000 to $100,000 in battery storage within a generation (25 years) as the only viable cost saving measure available to consumers is to treat energy like stocks and buy low, evening out demand and creating a win win.

But the era of cheap energy is over. If I consume 500kwh a month for $100, and 3000km of driving at a cost of $300 gas money, that's $5000 a year.

I'm expecting to pay $15000 a year for that same benefit in the near future, with an investment of $75000 in batteries being able to drop that cost to $10000 a year. More renewables = more savings because more price fluctuations.

What isn't going to make a blip on those calculations is infrastructure hardening against terrorists because its dirt cheap to just lock them up, throw away the key, and repair the damage.

aquarium87··on Obesity in America is more about snacks than giant meals
As someone with a BMI that typically exceeds obese by a percentage point or two, I am wary of aggregate diet data.

I'm fat not because of snacking, but because of 1500, 2000, and 2500 calorie meals.

N of 1 here. Take it for what it's worth, I'm skeptical of averaged data like this. There is simply no way to tell whether it's outliers like me skewing the data, or whether it represents reality.

aquarium87··on Back to the future: Mastodon is restoring the lost art of online conversation
As someone that loved the 1995-2005 internet, and used to believe that mastodon was the future, how do I go about getting into it again?

It seems I was pessimistic that mastodon could compete with big tech, and counterintuitively, it took one of "my" guys, Elon, to blaspheme the left into counterintuitively making mastodon a viable reality again.

I think the potential is to have a twitter/reddit hybrid where tangentially connected communities are a thing again, and expertise is agreggated in the proper spaces to provide expert level insights and advice on narrow and specific topics.

But I'm not sure how to go about, say, joining a like minded community of apolitical bbq enthusiests, or stereo enthusiests, or technology enthusiests.

aquarium87··on Think power is expensive now? Just wait until we need security guards
Neat. Simplistic.

Better, wait until energy generation is universal, interchangeable, and decarbonized. Then all physical energies become equal in price and value, but driven high because demand is soaring and oils and natural gasses are simply not on the table, and reserved exclusively for plastics and physically constructed petrochemical objects rather than energy generation.

Yes. Energy prices are going to skyrocket, but not for the reasons stated.

aquarium87··on Elon Musk Says Twitter to Roll Out Zero Ads Subscription Model
It takes away power. Doesn't matter if 1/2 still use ads. Paying users can then exert power over Twitter as well.

It's not the crazy harrassign me. It's the crazy doing an end run around me and leveraging the choke point of advertising, where several thousand nasty emails and phone calls are enough to get most all advertisers to say anything to stop the pain. I don't have to deal with it.

Now I also have a painpoint to infect damages against Twitter if I choose. That takes monetary commitment.

A more balanced future is where crazy exert pressure on advertisers, and customers exert pressure on twitter. The advertisers give in, twitter and advertisers lose. Advertisers start realizing its a lose lose and all the boycotts are fake anyway as online lynch mobs don't purchase their products anyway.

Hopefully, after all that pain, we can get back to live and let live. Because the alternative is a dual economy where everyone loses.

As for dailystormer, that's just an example. And a repugnant one that got me lots of down votes. Oh well, such is intolerance ;)

aquarium87··on Elon Musk Says Twitter to Roll Out Zero Ads Subscription Model
I want this. I HATE ads. I hate that the revenue models require ads. I pay for VPN. I pay for email. I use twitter a lot.

Would pay $10/month easy.

As someone on the right, I also cannot trust, rely on, or build anything on any platform or network that is ad based. The crazys will come for anything I create, eventually. With tactics like 24/7 harassment to advertisers that just want the problem to go away.

It's terrorist in nature. Ad based revenue equates to censorship for some, due to the weak chokepoint/painpoint of advertisers.

Advertisers should care about revenue, regardless of the customer. Noone ever said "there's a donut ad on daily stormer. I'm not buying those donuts anymore"

It's the activists that lie, pretend to be pissed off customers, harass and threaten, and create the illusion of outrage.

Anyone saying twitter should die because of this doesn't understand the gamble of global dominance. Elon wants to own the "everything" app. Advertising dollars are not compatible with an everything app.

aquarium87··on Low THD PWM audio amp, DIY friendly
I spent 10 minutes looking for how the challenge would be set up. I couldn't find the requirements. Seems like publicity stunt that is uncashable. Have you seen the terms and conditions?

Would be very interested in them. Seems like Randi is straying out of his lane on this one.

aquarium87··on One of the World’s Coldest Places Is Now the Warmest It’s Been in 1k Years
You are forgiven for thinking that scientist believe humans caused this warming.

They both do and don't. 97% of scientists DO believe that humans have at least SOME impact. 3% believe humans have Zero impact.

But that doesn't say anything, anything at all. It's a propaganda piece. 97% of scientists COULD believe that warming is 99% natural, and that stat would be technically correct. It simply doesnt have any meaning.

The question that is rarely asked or claimed is what percentage is natural and what percentage is anthropogenic?

aquarium87··on One of the World’s Coldest Places Is Now the Warmest It’s Been in 1k Years
It's simple. All predictions and models have failed to date. They have 1000+ climate models, and every couple years take and promote the best performing ones to give the illusion of credibility. In reality, past performance is not an indicator of future performance.

A more simplistic gold standard approach says just look at sea level rise, and it's relatively flat at about 3mm per year, or a foot per century.

The entire climate industry relies on unproven, highly speculative feedback loops that unsuccessfully attempt to model the effects of moisture in the air.

aquarium87··on New podcast creation has fallen off a cliff
First off, it's important to realize they mean audio only podcasts. [1]

My opinion is that monetization is killing podcasts the way it killed a free and open internet. Everyone wants to wall off and exploit listeners for profit, or to make $ and quit their jobs. That's not the spirit of the internet with a free exchange of ideas.

My other concern is that eyeballs are worth, I have heard, 4x the revenue VS ears only. It makes sense, as it's far easy to manipulate people and exploit the cult of personality when you own someone's eyeballs.

I personally have friends that have become dumb as bricks after giving their eyeballs to YouTube podcasts and channels where they are easily manipulated with 3 second snapshots of legitimate quotes and scientific papers. They think everything is on the up and up because the claims come from scientific journals, and they saw it with their own eyes. They don't understand its taken out of context or the facts stretched in service of a narrative. They would NEVER dream of going to the source document and reading it.

A good example, and one of the better ones that I actually don't mind the fringe conspiracy fantasy elements of is Ben Davidson of suspicious observers and space weather news.

But his business model is destructive and detrimental to society. Just go to the youtube page, and watch a video. Seems pretty legit, except there is no way to adequetly fact check the science behind it because he often uses one paper and cherrypicks what he likes and then matter of factly states that other parts of the same paper are flat out wrong. Lol.

There are no links to show notes or scientific papers. You have to pause the video, and scour the internet to hopefully get first hand sourcing of claims. And many papers are firewalled, so the guy can say just about anything he wants and people take it as gospel truth because he shows a paragraph from a peer reviewed journal.

Instead of providing relevant links, it's just 47 links to all his monetization in the shownotes.

It's infotainment, not science.

But also a perfect example of how audio podcasts are dying because content creators are moving to video "podcasts", which this article doesn't recognize.

[1] https://twitter.com/Jason/status/1615043223709442049?t=1fdsE...

aquarium87··on [dead]
The simplistic solution is to categorizing chests as flat and/or hairy, and visibly visibly protruding/smooth.

Forget people's sex. It's either a breast shape or its not.

aquarium87··on International tourism is set to return to pre-pandemic levels in 2023
TLDR; no, only in "some regions". [2]

Travel is not returning to prepandemic levels using ANY metric, known model or estimate referenced in this UN article. Nor, apparantly, is that even a goal of the UN. Only "sustainable recovery and lasting change", whatever that means. I'm pretty sure they don't actually mean "global international tourist arrivals", or inflation adjusted dollars spent reaching 2019 levels when they talk about "sustainable recovery"

"From Crisis to Transformation

The report is built around the tourism’s contribution to a more sustainable future. With the COVID-19 pandemic as the starting point, it charts a path through the progress made by UNWTO in supporting the sector through the worst crisis in its history while also laying the foundations for sustainable recovery and lasting change." [2]

[1] https://www.unwto.org/news/tourism-set-to-return-to-pre-pand... [2] https://www.unwto.org/

aquarium87··on Low THD PWM audio amp, DIY friendly
The problem with this is that it's way too easy to to tell the difference between power cables. Even non audiophiles can hear the difference. This is also 15 years ago. Manufacturing has taken such a leap between then and now that even if it was in doubt then, it's certainly not now. Now it's simply a matter of taste, and the better way to represent the reality of cables is that it's subjective, they do sound different, and even though everyone has their favorite cables, no one can agree on what sounds good, much less what makes them sound good. But in general, an better cable will sound "more agreeable" to more people.

I also agree there are a lot of garbage overpriced cables.

I think it's important to remember cables are not measured under appropriate loads, and they aren't measured connected to real equipment.

The measuring equipment falls far far short in the Audio world. Take for example the Audio Precision APx555B. It's the best audio analyzer in existence, and if you go to audiosciencereview, there are now DACs that have measurements that are below the measurable threshold for this machine in certain regards.

Power cables are the same. Not measurable in a meaningful way.

aquarium87··on Low THD PWM audio amp, DIY friendly
I think you misunderstand sampling theory. Sampling theory allows the sampling and recreation of ALL information, not just the 44100 samples, but datapoints in between. Sorry about the potential bad formatting, it's from a pdf.

"By contrast, the waveform reconstruction process – digital-to-analogue conversion – is not so simple. In an ideal world it would be achieved by generating an impulse of appropriate amplitude for each sampling point and passing the train of regularly spaced impulses through an ideal low-pass filter with its passband upper edge set to half the sampling rate. The impulse response of such a filter is the sinc function, so each impulse would generate a sinc waveform of the necessary amplitude, and the train of sinc functions would sum to recreate the original waveform.

This is illustrated in Fig 2, which shows six successive sinc functions of different amplitude and their sum (the black trace). Each sinc function contributes nothing to the summed signal amplitude at other sampling points, but does contribute to the waveform between the sampling points. It’s a common misunderstanding of sampling to suppose that the waveform between sampling points is unknowable but that is not true – provided that the input signal is bandlimited and sampled at least twice as fast as its highest component frequency, as required by the Shannon sampling process. In that case the waveform between sampling points can be reconstructed unambiguously. Importantly, the wave shape depends not just on the value of nearby samples but, ultimately, on the pattern of samples throughout the sampled signal" [1]

[1] https://drive.google.com/open?id=1QhJo_Rh8sQsItFvJ1g-MnNlg9p...

Or click the link here: https://chordelectronics.co.uk/explained-rob-watts-filter-te...

aquarium87··on Low THD PWM audio amp, DIY friendly
It takes a lot of computing power to reconstruct an audio sample well. Once reconstructed it takes massive massive amounts of storage.

It's all about the Shannon Nyquist sampling theorum.

"Strictly speaking, the theorem only applies to a class of mathematical functions having a Fourier transform that is zero outside of a finite region of frequencies. Intuitively we expect that when one reduces a continuous function to a discrete sequence and interpolates back to a continuous function, the fidelity of the result depends on the density (or sample rate) of the original samples. The sampling theorem introduces the concept of a sample rate that is sufficient for perfect fidelity for the class of functions that are band-limited to a given bandwidth, such that no actual information is lost in the sampling process. It expresses the sufficient sample rate in terms of the bandwidth for the class of functions. The theorem also leads to a formula for perfectly reconstructing the original continuous-time function from the samples." [1]

But, HOLD ON: "Practical digital-to-analog converters produce neither scaled and delayed sinc functions, nor ideal Dirac pulses. Instead they produce a piecewise-constant sequence of scaled and delayed rectangular pulses (the zero-order hold), usually followed by a lowpass filter (called an "anti-imaging filter") to remove spurious high-frequency replicas (images) of the original baseband signal." [1]

In case that was too verbose.....

"sample rate that is sufficient for perfect fidelity".... "such that no actual information is lost in the sampling process"... "theorem also leads to a formula for perfectly reconstructing the original continuous-time function from the samples"

PERFECTLY!!! Zero information loss between sampling and reconstruction. Still WTFs me to this day.

So yeah, you can feed bits to a PWM. But that not music.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist%E2%80%93Shannon_samp...

aquarium87··on Low THD PWM audio amp, DIY friendly
I understand the sentiment, but tech has improved a lot. Check out the NAD M22. I own one. It's not to be laughed at under any circumstances or in any comparison to other amplifiers.
← PreviousPage 4 of 5Next →