Why is humanity the "subject" of History and technology simply the "object"?
Why do we always think like this?
225 karma · joined June 20, 2016
I founded Ocator (http://ocator.com), a farming startup, and Liderfood (http://liderfood.com.br/en/), a food marketplace in Brazil.
Why do we always think like this?
Not an attack, but an actual question.
Something that can be done out of my heart.
Basic income doesn't end supply and demand of labor. In other words, if all you want is money, you'll still perform these jobs.
http://www.calmclinic.com/anxiety/symptoms/derealization
A friend that suffers from the condition could never really explain what it felt like. Then, he tried VR for the first time.
>this friendly, fat Santa in these bright red robes, which, I don't think is a coincidence, match the color of the Coke logo — this really took hold in American culture."
http://www.npr.org/2016/12/20/506215632/how-red-and-green-be...
1) A corporation is not the same as a German citizen.
2) "Contest" is not the same as "suing"
3) No German has a net worth of over U$300B (FB's Market Cap)
Take freedom of speech, social justice, progress,... as an universal and it's ultimately destructive (to believers and itself).
This is not a contract between two corporations.
A private corporation should NOT sue a government for creating a new law. As long as it's legally feasible, Germany should do whatever it deems necessary to its own sovereignty and interests.
Answer the question:
Is it bad to "suppress speech" that is a threat to "free speech" itself?
refers to "not performing a comercial activity", which means the same thing in my native language.
If you read my whole comment you can clearly see that's my point:
>Do they give up? Do they get depressed? Do they create things? Does entrepreneurship increase? Violence rate?
You need to understand how people react to the idea of "not doing anything and still get paid".
Do they give up? Do they get depressed? Do they create things? Does entrepreneurship increase? Violence rate?... These are all interesting questions
Privacy laws getting loose, private business making deals with the government, social acceptance based on a "state of emergency".
Only difference is that the infrastructure of "Western digital totalitarian states" is run by private corporations.
MBAs and their professors simply replicate and regurgitate an ideology that is outside their own awareness and control.
Lutheranism itself is more to blame than the whole faculty of HBS and SBS combined.
It's a problem of universals, not individuals.
Go radically against these and chaos will erupt. It's both unintelligent and ideological to take speed as an absolute.
Apply your line of thought to democracy and you'll see what's the problem.
>The plaintiffs suing Facebook's board include pension funds, like the Employee Retirement System for the city of Providence, Rhode Island, and individual investors
It may be "founder-friendly", but it's hurting thousands of Average Joes.
It's not shiny or different - it doesn't have to. As long as it makes X more productive, it will help people in the long-term.
Still, as I grew my company, I've realized how inaccurate they can be. Some of the best performing testers couldn't demonstrate a long-term perspective or broad set of knowledge/opinions.
Whereas they were terrific at solving puzzles, they couldn't accept or recognize a puzzle itself.
It is possible to have a healthy calorie consumption with fast food. During college, I was able to compete in a natural bodybuilding competition by mostly eating like this.
It's all about what you choose to eat. No matter where you are.
Couldn't the bacteria be instead the result of a high body fat percentage?
Many Americans obsess about graduating in their "dream field" before they're 22. It's much better not to worry about food, roommates, books, and so forth.