15,472 karma · joined January 4, 2011
That's good to do, but by far the #1 thing for high blood pressure is exercise. A consistent schedule of intense cardio is probably the best single thing you can do for your health in general, and definitely for hypertension.
As you say, not necessarily a bad thing, but it's where I personally lose interest.
I agree with the other reasons, but Godot fully supports C# and C++; GDScript is something you can ignore entirely if you feel like it.
Indeed, one good reason to use Godot over Unity is that you can write (and debug) your game using the latest .NET SDK.
This criterion means you'd have to roll your own solution. Otherwise, ImGuiListClipper exists for exactly this kind of thing.
https://github.com/ocornut/imgui/blob/864a2bf6b824f9c1329d84...
Maybe you don't want to pursue a career in software, but anyone can spend a week learning Python or JavaScript. I suspect/hope a lot of these people are just kids who haven't gotten there yet.
But the distinctive characteristic of the new model is to operate at large scale with human trafficking.
Right, that's surely the main job of nearly every experienced developer. It's really cool that LLMs can generate code for isolated tasks, but they can barely even begin to do the hard work, and that seems very unlikely to change in the foreseeable future.
When you make yet another toy game engine, you've hopefully learned a lot, but what you have is a lot of dead code.
I can definitely relate to concerns about new features attracting new users with less expertise and more questions; it's something I've directly experienced, albeit on a much smaller scale.
Really bad call, takes away from an otherwise very good movie.
But yeah I think C# is often unfairly viewed as a boring enterprise-y language when it's actually become a very comfy swiss army knife.
Is the ad business so bad these days that they can't effectively monetize this? It seems like they're flailing around in desperation instead of leveraging their core advantages.
I think this is genuinely my biggest complaint about the C++ standard library. There are countless scenarios where you want deterministic random numbers (for testing if nothing else), so std's distributions are unusable. Fortunately you can just plug in Boost's implementation.
But it is very frequently possible to find the actual maximum you will need, allocate that upfront, and everything's great.
I'm sure there's a good reason why this is hard, but I'm a little surprised that this isn't caught by static analysis. Sure enough, I can't get MSVC Code Analysis to complain about the example with different inline functions.
I can understand how the iPad crush ad slipped out, because there's a genuine positive intention and they just missed the secondary interpretation. But I don't see how "AI writes a deeply personal letter for you" could possibly appeal to anyone.
If their focus group liked it, I can't even imagine how bad the other ads they tested were.
https://www.uclahealth.org/news/release/counterfeit-pills-so...
Yeah. It's this. For all the media obsession about a new "ultra-processed" category, it's the same old boring dietary conclusions: salt is bad, sugar is bad, saturated fat is mostly bad.
You don't have to know anything about how food was "processed", you can still just look at the label.
Although, s-video on a 1CHIP still looks great. It's just as sharp, only the colors are slightly off.