3,538 karma · joined May 15, 2010
* * . * .
.. * o
o * . *
________
(________)
| o |
| o o |
| o |
| o o |
| o o |
| o |
( o )
\ o /
\ /
\ /
||
||
||
||
||
___||___
/ || \
\________/I think for FORTRAN or Julia, using 1-based indexing is a good idea, because most mathematical algorithms are written in notation using 1-based indices. As someone who spent a semester debugging subtle off-by-one errors and small differences in results in his scientific computing classes because I foolishly opted for C rather than FORTRAN, understand that converting algorithms with nested summations and integrators from one convention to another is painful.
Lua should never have used 1-based indexing because it was meant to interface with C code which itself will have data structures that use 0-based indexing. Writing lua extensions for wireshark, for example, is incredibly painful just because of this.
Intel is ABSOLUTELY just about CPUs. I can’t think of a single thing that they produce that I would ever pay them money for other than CPUs, especially if they aren’t relevant in the CPU world anymore. Intel has tried to get into so many other markets over the years, but the company’s culture and the nature of their high margin, high R&D business made it impossible to compete in those other markets.
Intel's productions nodes might be behind TSMC's but they are still quite valuable, not all chips need 5nm processes. Heck we could say most chips don't need it.
That’s a very different market with very different margins. If they shrank so much that they became like Maxim or something, then that’s really not much different than going out of business altogether.
At any rate, it seems like we all agree that 16:9 is a rubbish aspect ratio for a laptop screen. I can't wait for Lenovo to release a 16:10 version of my X1 extreme.
I've been told this too, but just how many 14" TVs does the consumer electronics industry sell in a year? And compared to laptops? It's hard to believe that laptop sales don't completely dwarf this weird niche 14" TV market.
And then Tesla comes along with great engineering and a more conservative body design and eats their lunches.
As long as the US has the world’s only reserve currency and as long as the EU economy - especially the productive bit in the North - is built on exporting to the all-powerful US consumer, the EU has very little leverage in its affairs with the US.
The only two cases that I’m aware of where the US clandestinely toppled a foreign government were Chile and Iran - and apparently even the Iranian operation was mostly driven by the British secret service. And by all accounts, Chile was more of a nudge than a push.
In my C/C++ experience - it’s a big push that a software company would just rather not make. Even if you already have an ARM SKU for a different OS, all sorts of things can cause trouble. If you’re coding in C/C++, you’re probably pretty interested in performance and you’ll have a lot of hand tuned assembly and/or SIMD operations, and that can be a big pain to port, especially with different compilers and intrinsics.
I can only imagine the conversations that go on at Adobe or Autodesk or others when debating new platforms and SKUs. Given that even Microsoft wasn’t committed enough to ARM Windows to make a x64 emulator for it probably worked against this.
If we optimize for efficiency, we get supply disruptions every 5 years or so. If we optimize for redundancy, we suffer from higher prices all the time, and delayed availability of all new tech. I don’t know which is worse.
Most people don't care about battery life?
None of the people I’ve encountered who oppose housing construction seem to see things this way. Most of them seem to be economic conservatives who see themselves as having won a “fair game” and the fact that they’re using the government to strip others of their property rights - rights to build, rights to house - is lost to them. There’s a lot of cognitive dissonance and post-hoc rationalization in this group.
I got fast busy tones several times a year back in the 80's, and it usually corresponded to whenever a concert was announced. Maybe my phone company back then was as bad as your mobile services company is now?
So I guess not?
If you’re going to make US manufactured goods cost competitive with foreign goods, much of it has to come out of that 95% operating revenue that is operating expenses, most of which will be employee wages. There’s no way around this.
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.thestar.com/amp/news/insight...
Canadian retail is still such a cluster-f*ck.
1. he couldn't refund me because it was two separate computer systems (a lawyer would have told him tough sh*t - you're still the same company), and
2. I should do a credit-card charge-back to get my money back!
It's been years since, and I'm trying them again now. I ordered a set of dumbbells yesterday and ... still no email to come pick up my in-stock dumbbells.
BTW - I have wide feet too. If you're looking for running shoes, ASICS is good (this is the brand I always wear), and I've heard New Balance is pretty wide too. I can't wear Nike or Reebok for this reason.