Lenovo’s new ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga is less than half an inch thick
theverge.com
theverge.com
- 14" UHD+ (3840 x 2400) IPS, low-power, HDR400 with Dolby Vision™ DCI P3 100%, 500 nits, TÜV Rheinland-certified for reduced blue light emissions
- 14" FHD+* (1920 x 1200) IPS, anti-glare, low-power, 400 nits, Low-power, TÜV Rheinland-certified for reduced blue light emissions
- 14" FHD+* (1920 x 1200) IPS, anti-glare, touchscreen, 400 nits, TÜV Rheinland-certified for reduced blue light emissions
- 14" FHD+* (1920 x 1200) IPS, anti-glare, touchscreen, PrivacyGuard, 500 nits
Also nice that the HiDPI version is low-power. Interesting that the smaller x1 nano is also using the 16:10 screen, what a relief to have this across the range.
I welcome a future where gamers are told to fuck off, and laptop manufacturers instead embrace professional looking laptops with tall displays with very high PPI, long battery life, non-gamery keycap fonts, and no RGB anywhere.
I hide all kinds of shit like ribbons, status bars etc. to gain every last vertical pixel I can. Even better if an app will let me rearrange toolbars vertically.
16x9 is simply unusable for me on a laptop screen. Using an 4:3 iPad with keyboard/mouse reminds me of the good ol days before the HD screen size abominations.
I thought the 16:10 plague was because TV's were typically made in that aspect ratio and therefore it was cheaper to use the same panels in a laptop.
Gamers care more about refresh rate than the aspect ratio.
Anyway, hip, hip hurray for Dell and Lenovo going back to a good aspect ratio for coding.
It took 4K for computer screen resolutions to start going up again.
But even apart from the number of pixels, why must screens be shaped like a letterbox? The only thing 16:9 is good for is watching movies, and if you happen to want to do that on your laptop, small black bars at the top and bottom really aren't any problem at all.
For a laptop size screen, yeah, wide aspect ratio is not as useful.
Nope. These are some of the useful side by side compositions:
- Terminal/Editor + Documentation
- Teleconf + Meeting Notes
- One master, two slave terminals
- IDE + Browser (for real time testing)
- etc.
In fact, 15 years ago I had a coworker who used two 20" 1200x1600 on their side next to each other. That worked really well for having lots of text next to each other. It's basically a gigantic 3:2 screen, which is still a tiny bit taller than 16:10.
A 15" FHD screen is as effective as 24" FHD screen for me. If the panel quality is good enough, I can work for hours without scaling and eye-fatigue.
At that scenario menus, extra screen clutter doesn't change anything since everything is proportional to the bigger screen.
I've been told this too, but just how many 14" TVs does the consumer electronics industry sell in a year? And compared to laptops? It's hard to believe that laptop sales don't completely dwarf this weird niche 14" TV market.
At any rate, it seems like we all agree that 16:9 is a rubbish aspect ratio for a laptop screen. I can't wait for Lenovo to release a 16:10 version of my X1 extreme.
Personally, I don't think I want a thin laptop. Not for any kind of meaningful work, at least. Thin doesn't just mean less key travel, it also means less space for battery, and less space for cooling.
I mean, I don't want an excessively bulky laptop, but there's definitely a point where the returns from thinness diminish really hard.
Otherwise I'd buy a tablet.
Shame no Thunderbolt though.
I was thinking about upgrading recently and was leaning towards the T470 for various reasons, including seeing a few nice used ones available locally at "okay" prices... until I started to actually compare them!
Based on the benchmarks I could find, I came to the conclusion that the performance of the T470 was no better than that of my old tank, the W530 -- and may have even been worse! Once I looked into the cost of upgrading the RAM on the T470 (as I tend to run several VMs concurrently) I decided I'd simply be wasting money "upgrading" to the T470.
Additionally, I've got a T420 which, although even older, still performs amazingly well -- once it was upgraded to 16 GB of RAM and a 480 GB SSD. I've only got ~$150 in it and it'll do a fine job if/when the W530 finally dies.
(The "upgrade" wasn't really a priority anyways, as I've got a beast of a workstation that I use 90% of the time.)
Was 1400 quid, the ZenBook I bought the missus with the Ryzen 4xxx obliterates it.
The perf improvement from 3rd to 8th gen intels was marginal.
Thank god AMD and M1 is pushing things forwards finally.
Buying a machine 4 years later and getting bugger all improvement gets old after a while.
Now I’m wfh forever I use my desktop and the laptop sits next to the work MacBook, forlorn and alone.
And yet repetitively we dont get those products.
Like this trend with protruding cameras out of phone's body. Just make the body that bit thicker and slap bigger battery on it.
And you can boast in ads that it last 2 days instead 5hrs.
Maybe we are wrong? Or there is some kind of nonobvious business logic behind it.
5000mAh and 30W charging for just over £200: https://www.gsmarena.com/motorola_moto_g9_plus-10432.php
There are a couple of dozen now https://www.productchart.co.uk/smartphones/
It seems wildly stupid, and it is in some objective sense, but people make bad purchasing decisions. See: Cars in the united states continuing to get bigger and bigger.
I searched for weeks to find a phone matching my SO's requirements and in the end had to order it from China . Few 'majority consumers' have the time or patience for that, so they just put up with thin batteries and camera bumps.
I don't think most people care about RAM upgrades. Non-technical people will probably either just put up with their computer becoming somewhat slower if software requirements change over time, or they don't have use cases where they'd run out of RAM in the first place.
A nice and "modern" looking form factor is probably a greater factor for most people even if they did care about the upgradability to some extent.
I don't really get the trend towards non-replaceable batteries, though, at least not from a customer perspective. Batteries often begin to degrade much earlier than a decent laptop would otherwise show any age, so it makes almost no sense whatsoever (except perhaps some kind of a small improvement in size due to simpler construction) to not be able to replace those. Maybe people get their batteries replaced at a shop or they just put up with degraded batteries, too.
I agree it replacements and upgrades should be doable, and that it would be responsible, and I'd appreciate it if at least models marketed towards developers, engineers and other technical professionals would have that. Most people probably just won't care enough, though.
I had always assumed they did this for case reasons. A smaller phone means room the case could occupy. Fairly logical imo, though it feels like crap if you don't have a case.
As it is my iPhone 10, a fairly small phone (not a large model, i forget which) feels huge with a case. Cases make it weird.
That being said, my T480s had to go into warranty aleady, three times total if you count the TB3 docking station (which to me counts as one system I use together all the time): the motherboard was fried on the T480s. And since everything is one block of silicon, they had to switch out the entire thing, except for the hard drive.
The TB3 dock gen1 is the single worst bit of technology I ever had the displeasure of owning and using. Next to countless incompatibilities and instabilities, it just died a sudden death on me recently. Still a couple months within the 3-year warranty.
That's a serious engineering flaw on Lenovo's side. A better manufacturer would've made sure it died outside of warranty. They're really dropping the ball, you can tell by that.
We’re lucky that we still have removable M.2 SSDs at all. It looks like devices will be moving to fully soldered storage in the next few years.
What makes you say that? Unlike smartphones, laptops are still widely used as productivity stations. Surely that means there will continue to be high demand for upgradable and replaceable internal storage.
- Two m2/nvme slots
- Upgradeable ram
- 17" retina resolution
- 2.9lb weight
- 16:10 aspect ratio
- User replaceable battery/speakersI used older Thinkpad for 2 years on laptop keyboard exclusively, but then switched to external ones as they are just better.
I really hope this ultrabook meme ends.
Although I don't really care about how thin it is, per se. Weight is what matters.
For those 4 groups, most ultrabooks suffer from:
1. Being underpowered (for gamers and some engineers this means graphically, for programmers memory/cpu count/cpu speed)
2. Insufficient ports (particularly for engineers, technicians, and some programmers and gamers)
3. Insufficiently sturdy (technicians, some engineers and programmers)
But often they do have good battery life, but by virtue of being underpowered that doesn't really help in the balance.
Companies that do make laptops (IME) aimed at gamers, tend to not make laptops that have decent battery life (that is, most desktop replacement laptops get good performance, but terrible battery life). And laptops aimed at engineers and technicians tend to be 3" thick, have terrible battery life, and have grossly underpowered processors and graphics, but they have every port you could ever want.
is that really necessary? my "work" is a complicated desktop c++ application. short of a 17" desktop replacement, there simply isn't enough thermal budget in any conceivable laptop design to compile this program in under an hour. thus, all I want out of a laptop is the thinnest lightest x86 machine that offers decent performance for web browsing, playing movies, and editing word documents.
I really hope for a future in which we can both get laptops that fit our needs.
It lowers the lowest common denominator, in other words. The gulf between "consumption machine" and "work machine" is now higher.
I have no experience with Apple hardware, but I don't think Airs have a reputation of being super fragile either.
The thinner and lighter form factor also does have its advantages; it's a bit more comfortable to handle when using it to watch video on the couch, for example.
Compromised performance is definitely true, though. (Or compromised thermals, or some kind of a compromise on that axis in any case.) Ditto for more or less compromised upgradability and replaceability, which is unfortunate.
I wouldn't necessarily want the thinness to end, although striving towards it at all costs is something I would also disagree with, and probably wouldn't go for the absolute thinnest stuff there is.
Does it get noisy? That is the really pertinent question. My last job required me to work on a Lenovo T490 and that thing spun its fans to 3300 RPM the moment you looked at it and asked it to do a 5 second CPU-intensive task. Hated those machines for life but I suspect at least 90% of all laptops are like that.
Now all that I've heard about MacBook M1 models, that's what sounds appealing. Nearly zero audible fan activity.
note: 20gb of ram, but I do cpu intensive things all the time.
It was awful. :(
I was at 40GB RAM (the stock soldered 8GB plus an extra 32GB stick). And for what it's worth, an external 2560x1080 display. Maybe that was it? But IMO no, it activated fans on CPU load only. Still, maybe the extra strain on the video stack kept it at a higher temperature internally so it was quick to turn on the fans at the smallest of loads? Could be.
Glad it works well for you though. What OS do you use?
My old MBP with it's C2D desktop-class chip was both quieter, and less random with fan speed changes. I hear it less because it's constant.
I think in the modern era, if you want above average performance, it'll be far from silent.
I have no qualms with my Win10 gaming PC being slightly audible (I use FractalDesign case with Noctua fans to it's not easy to actually hear it). I have no trouble with a machine spinning its fans here and there.
But for my former work Lenovo T490 killed all my desire to work. Sometimes it even started making noise (again for a full minute) after I saved a file in Emacs (so the language server kicked in for 2-3 secs).
From here on I'll just be only on desktop machines and will soon buy a Linux desktop workstation plus a MacBook Pro M1 with which I'll only do work outside when I absolutely positively can't do it at home. And use it for remoting to my machines as well, of course.
I did however move all my hardware shit into the cloud as it works out fractionally cheaper than running a hefty desktop as and when I need one and things blowing up in it aren't my problem any more.
reg #### add HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power /v PlatformAoAcOverride /t REG_DWORD /d 0
(By removing the #### and pasting the above readers agree that I am not liable for breakages)
Here's a side profile:
https://help.apple.com/assets/5F46CA8B094622AD463B4A64/5F46C...
1. See tech specs on this page: https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/coming-soon/X1-Carbon-G9/p/22TP...
Whereas, I have replaced almost everything (keyboard, charger, battery, wifi/bluetooth) on my Dell XPS and the case is falling apart (broken monitor hinge glued back together). Its very frustrating..
Why don't you just use a PC then?
Great laptop for my needs, 64 GB RAM, came with M2 SSD and took for 2 more drives, and has dedicated graphics card. No complaints.
The hardware works just fine.
Thanks for your opinion.
> The hardware works just fine.
The post was based on multiple people within my company, not just me. I would not recommend the old P50 on Linux.
Not particularly pleased with it. Gets really hot (i7 chip) and quite noisy, touchpad glitches out and gets 'sticky' randomly, battery seems to often go to a 'plugged in but not charging state' and the battery life is pretty dire.
Machine itself feels nice though and the performance is good.
I think my next purchase will be an ARM Macbook if I dare to cough up the dough.
Based on other sites it seems to be a "titanium material", so ya just a alloy.
I found the T490(s) to have a very bad set of possible options. My T480s came with a 1440p Screen and 24 GB of RAM, but I couldn't configure that with the new series.
I was forced to go with the X1 Carbon Linux Edition. I have a mild feeling that the T line is being gutted for the X Line
But on display side it’s then 1080p or the 4K screens. No personal experience on 4K, but I’ve heard battery life can take bit hit. I’m happy with lower res as I can use it on Windows without scaling.
Full screen Sublime, full screen tmux and a full screen web browser.
It also drives another 4K monitor when I'm in the office.
I really want to find something to replace it when it dies but so far I can't find anything that works well and does not look like someone's go to market product
If someone is not tied to Windows, it's hard to justify this over a $999 MBA.
Now I want a high-spec traditional laptop again though. :)
Never buy Lenovo unless you're willing to lose your machine without recourse.
So I got another Dell Latitude. Refurb, i7, last model with expandable RAM. 5 YEARS of on-site warranty (which I've used numerous times and been very happy with in the UK/EU).
I also ordered some other kit from Lenovo, unfortunately they filled in a customs form wrong and UPS returned it to sender immediately. That was 3 weeks ago, they seem to have lost it.
"We want to make a laptop so thin you'll close it and never find it again."
An SFF case, desktop components and any old laptop (of which I have plenty) to connect remotely will have to do.