1,284 karma · joined October 10, 2008
I write at Waxy.org, organize the XOXO Festival in Portland, started Upcoming.org, run Belong.io (a link aggregator) and Playfic (a community for writing/sharing interactive fiction). Helped build Kickstarter, as their former CTO and now an advisor to the company.
My guess is that 1. there’s virtually no demand from potential supporters for a more convenient way to pay creators than existing payment/subscription apps, and 2. relatively few creators have direct control over their own internet presence anymore, so any solution that requires modifying a web page is dead in the water.
Any new attempt to pay creators that doesn’t factor these two realities in will likely fail, because it just makes things harder than existing solutions.
It looks more like using bubbles to pop an endless stream of bad guys, Bubble Bobble-style.
https://media.giphy.com/media/DpXqHdILXRRDi/giphy.gif
So, no, I never worried about anything in an NES game having a negative effect on him.
The article was intended to be a little provocative, more than a little tongue-in-cheek, but suffice it to say, I never would've continued playing videogames with him if he didn't show interest.
He was nothing less than absurdly enthusiastic about it, and it was a way for us to kill time together, but I never pushed games on him for a moment. Eliot, like many of his friends, loves the creativity and collaboration that comes with the medium of games, and the social aspects of playing them with his friends and family.
He's turning 13 this week, and has taken classes on making games himself in GameMaker, and is now modding the games that he loves. I'm happy he's found a hobby he loves, and I'm proud of him.
https://twitter.com/waxpancake/status/868668282953318400
We just beat Wishbringer last week. Thinking Planetfall or Zork next.
Addressing your comments:
1. Google News Archive is, without question, a dead project. No new material is being added, no new development is being made, and it's unsupported. They removed the News Archive and homepage and redirected it to News.
The method Google suggests for web search isn't limited to news articles, making it effectively useless for research. (It shows everything indexed in Google.)
You can search for some newspapers in Google Search, but it's impossible to find any date before January 1970, order by date, or filter by publication. You're stuck with post-1970 date filtering for all papers, ordered by relevance. https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Agoogle.com%2Fnewspape...
For reference, these were the options that were available in News Archive Search: http://www.library.illinois.edu/hpnl/images/newspapers/gna_a...
2. I didn't say Groups was dead. I said it was effectively dead for research purposes, which is true. For example, you can't search or filter by date across groups anymore: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/linux
In your example, how would you propose (for example) finding the first mention of Linux on Usenet? You can't, at least in part because the option to order by date is completely broken: https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=site%3Agroups.google.com+a...
Not to mention, only a fraction of the total posts are indexed and available in Google Search. For example, changing your query to limit to 1995 only results in 70 posts. There were many more than that being posted monthly in 1995 in comp.os.linux.advocacy alone.
3. It's entirely plausible that Google's library partners are running low on books, though that doesn't explain why the project appears to be completely dormant. As I mentioned, the official blog stopped updating in 2012 and the Twitter account's been dormant since February 2013. It doesn't seem like any book's been added in the last year -- no new books from January 2014 to today: https://www.google.com/search?q=a&biw=1146&bih=933&source=ln...
4. The 20% time thing is interesting. As a Google engineer, I imagine you'd have a better perspective on that than I would.
Former employees have explicitly said that 20% time no longer exists in the way it used to, and current employees, including here on Hacker News, say that it exists but only on top of your existing workload (effectively making it 120% time). I tend to trust them over a PR person, but really, that was a brief aside in my overall article.
The fact that a tiny fraction of the former functionality of a service is possible, albeit with an obscure and user-unfriendly method, does not detract from the overall point:
Google's current priorities don't appear to be in archiving the past.
It's an automated aggregator streaming tweets from around 1,000 Twitter accounts, extracting and normalizing the links, and then ordering them with a dead-simple ranking algorithm favoring URLs that resemble new projects/sites over articles/blog posts.
That's pretty much it, no idea how it ended up here.
My understanding, looking at the recent projects in the Technology and Web categories, is that they've loosened their enforcement of that guideline over the last year. Take a look at a search for "Social" in Technology, and you'll see a bunch of sites/apps that push that guideline: https://www.kickstarter.com/discover/advanced?term=social&ca...
I think the fact that Upcoming is, first and foremost, an arts/technology event calendar weighed in its favor over, say, a social network for cats.
And I'm not "whining," thank you. I already have access to the app. I just thought it was a fun way to visualize the line.