Get $3.5m and give away $1.3m. You'll have exactly what you asked for.
If you get atop job, salary plus options you could do it. Of course, unless you spend it.
460 karma · joined August 4, 2017
Get $3.5m and give away $1.3m. You'll have exactly what you asked for.
If you get atop job, salary plus options you could do it. Of course, unless you spend it.
Did you miss this^^? She complained. Maybe she complained to get back at him but still, she complained.
Bill Gates also dated and married a subordinate. Poor woman, where was Gloria Allred to save her...
Gold just sits on a vault--which is a great thing for rich people to use a small % of their wealth for. Just in case. Gold has other uses and a 5000+ year history. Compare it to hundreds of coins out there
I believe that in authoritarian regimes you have ZERO choice or recourse. See Russia or Al-Waleed in Saudi Arabia. They will simply shut you down, break you in a gazillion pieces.
In USA you have courts at least. Have you noticed that Google is pushing encryption all over the web to make NSA's job harder or impossible? Let Alibaba or TenCent help thwarting FSB or China's security services
In all seriousness: The govt wants its taxes. We're talking HUNDREDS of billions now in coin value, not millions. Sure they are traceable, but at what cost? They can't pay $100K in fees to run blockchain audits to see if what you declared was correct or not...
USA has made virtually every bank in the world spend gazillions to report every account opened by a US person, Bitcoin is probably a walk in the park compared to that.
They might have to pay a few billion in fines or damages but that's all. New CEO will apologize and we'll forget it. And that is because they got caught...
Not defending them, just saying in many cases these tactics work.
No Google or FB in China, no TenCent in USA either...
Comms directors provide more immediate returns, namely fundraising and spinning. However, top professors can write their ticket just to say they're there and earn a fortune on the side.
What's brutal is their salary, £8.2 an hour, but 55 hours in the busiest season is called brutal? Please.
The fact that he is rich means that people will listen to him more.
I know it's not good for free pres when a billionaire funds whatever lawsuit he can find against you, but outing someone, is really, really sleazy. So I guess they're even. Kinda.
Of course, until 5 years from now, they simply frown their faces about an article and editors get the message.
Maybe it is like you said, maybe it will end like this:
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2005/dec/12/newscorporatio... "I picked up the phone and called Murdoch and said that I was speaking not as a shareholder, but as a viewer of Fox. I said that these are not Muslim riots, they are riots," Campaign Middle East magazine quoted the prince as saying.
"He investigated the matter and called Fox and within half an hour it was changed from 'Muslim riots' to 'civil riots'."
Money does strange things.
That's to increase ad revenue, make no mistake about it. Like Google's algorithm and display changes...buy ads to be on top of the page
Yeah, a Google /FB /x employee can sacrifice for 10 years and then retire, at least outside USA. Live like immigrants that send all their money back to their home country, do.
He is selling shovels and jeans to gold rush miners. "Financial independence" when supplemented by the $$ he makes while telling people how he got rich surely makes a huge difference.
Fraud in the case is commuted upon the buyers and everyone that breathes that air (cancers, asthma...etc). You're talking tens of billions. Go rob a store and you get a lot more jail time. Yeah the store owner and 3 customer were traumatized but so were the thousands or millions of people that suffered (directly or indirectly) from your fraud.
Also, many time the Nazis officially or unofficially (ruling elites in city) "bought" them from Jewish owners. We can guess the price "agreed" to in those times.
If it's stolen and the government is after you (in this they will), you're toast.
He did save people a lot of money, but then he did also cause many stores to go kaput. So, how do you judge?
$20 Billion income a year
Lots of dividends over the years.
if this is lost value...I'd take it.
Yet they--and USA, Russia, France, UK etc--also have millions of soldiers and spend gazillions a year on conventional military stuff. Usually try to outdo each other.
>>Tibet on the other hand is a very long, complex and different story
Complex it is, but it's now 100% part of China, regardless of whatever.
>>in China, nobody think of India or Vietnam etc as enemy
Yet, they all have militaries and somewhere on the shelves they plans to attack /defend from each other. They are friends until they aren't. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/13/opinion/sunday/vietnams-o... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China%E2%80%93India_relations#...
They could have been very successful but I guess wanted to become a unicorn...
Thanks, but no, Mr Scientist.