499 karma · joined February 26, 2010
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/tlianza; my proof: https://keybase.io/tlianza/sigs/D2ZemYDgjwNRJ6UJM0KfBuGJQeXftD8vkBNRO8-eyS0 ]
Ummmm... 1. Does the data suggest that is true? 2. If it were true, would it support the "unbundling" narrative given that it would be a case of something being part of another bundle?
So, it may be more reliable than you think by virtue of that selective counting of codebase lines.
Vs. a OnePlus 6 it has a smaller screen, worse camera, one fewer sim slot, lacks a headphone jack, half the RAM, a slower processor, no face recognition, and a smaller battery.
In what way is it superior? Just screen resolution?
What would great videoconferencing software look like, and what are the odds that this is it?
For those who are interested: http://lianza.org/blog/2015/05/15/on-traveling-cross-country...
I get your point that Android, broadly, is a competitor to Apple. But, I think he's not just highlighting that the world needs an Amazon alternative (it has several).
I think he's saying the world needs a more open ecosystem where they have the choice of best-of-breed components from different companies. And, in that world, you might be able to pick the world's best compute stack from one company, use Cloudflare as the world's best edge/networking stack, etc.
If you want to do basic web surfing stuff, this is a phenomenal deal. I doubt you'll find a better one.
If you want to experience all that modern Android tablets are capable of, these tablets will not provide that. In particular anything related to Google services (mail/apps) and Android apps that are delivered through the Google Play store but not delivered though the Amazon store. There are a lot of mainstream apps that don't bother to push their apps to Amazon's store.
This is where I'm curious that they didn't just start writing PHP from that point forward. It was already a cross-platform language. And, if I recall, had a lot of hype and was gaining traction fast I'm the late 90's and early 2000's.
Certainly hindsight is 20-20, but I remember a lot of folks betting big on PHP at the time.
Mandarin is hard to learn, period. Even if you're born and raised in China and it's the only language you know, it still takes a long time to learn.
No need to single out the Westerners :)
When I read the "Discover Meteor" guide and they got to the part about handling submit buttons by writing jQuery handlers with e.preventDefault and all that, I was really surprised. Similarly I didn't see obvious, baked-in solutions to validation, or sharing templates between "edit" and "create" situations.
Then, there's the built-in Meteor accounts stuff, which does not make it easy to create an admin page for users, which again I expected to be a straightfoward task. And, not only that, but once you do start to build that you read more-and-more about how allowing the client to make certain modifications is insecure, and so you should start pushing things back to Meteor methods...
Anyway, a lot of this stuff has given me pause. I love the runtime speed, but the speed of getting something up and running (in terms of dev time) seems considerably slower than the equivalent in Rails, particularly around basic CRUD operations that you just need to get out of the way before you can build the more interesting stuff.
China is way, way, beyond the NSA. They block huge swaths of the internet and blackout televisions. They monitor every chat you send on WeChat, without even the illusion of a warrant or probable cause. And, they're not asking, it's a condition of WeChat's operation. Imagine if you DM'd someone on Facebook or Twitter and the US government stepped in and shut your account down. It's that.
Comparisons are fine, but these are not the backdoors "you were already compelled to insert."
In the context of China, I think you can interpret "controllable" as more than just controllable by the companies that operate the systems, but the government as well. And, the backdoors are necessary for that.
The main reason I think isn't even really #1 (cost) but a general assumption that CDNs are faster than your servers, and the chance that if multiple sites are sharing one of these CDNs, you actually have first-time users who can visit your site a bit faster because they already have that resource cached.
But, underpinning your story is the blame/cover angle which I completely understand, and would consider an antipattern itself. If a few people screen someone and decide to take a bit of a chance on them from a personality perspective and they don't work out, let them go, learn from it, and move on.
Is this a lot of money for the most viewed video in the history of the Internet and the most popular song worldwide?
But - what problem are we solving? Do we think there are too few entrepreneurs, and this will help create more? How many is enough, and how much should we spend to create them?
The problem Stewart seems to be solving is that he'd prefer to remove ammunition from his opponents' argument, which isn't an actual problem.
I think the author is being very subjective about The Best and using it to come to an odd conclusion. The more obvious and less controversial conclusion is that The Best apps are widely used and doing well.
Love Rails? Interested in online video/advertising/distribution? Learn More!