This goes for HR, education, code review, on and on.
2,091 karma · joined September 22, 2011
This goes for HR, education, code review, on and on.
Yes it's ALSO to a promote a book, but still... there's a lot more to it than just mindlessly raging against a new technology.
[1] https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/552-blood-in-the-mach...
Neat stuff!
I’ve had T1D for more than 30 years and have seen every headline under the sun with a “cure” always sometime in the next 5 years, so my expectations are properly tempered.
Still excited by it but a long way from clinics handing this out as a solution (if it’s viable).
A couple examples:
I remember this being a key troubleshooting step. Listen/feel for the hum of the hard drive OR the telltale click clack, grinding, etc that foretold doom.
Lots of various sources that you can download locally to have available offline. They're even providing some pre-loaded devices in areas where there may not be reliable or any internet access.
That it's not entirely clear makes it impossible to know if it might be something he could have success in.
Age aside, I feel uncomfortable about anyone new (even experienced COBOL programmers) being able to make changes in these systems, especially given their approach has been portrayed as broadly antagonistic to existing engineers and staff.
* More screenshots/use cases.
* Information about who you are/why it's called Kate's App. I think that especially for single/small dev teams, this can really help build trust and interest.
* Said elsewhere, but a publicly available privacy policy. Also not seeing any after signing up. Big red flag.
* IMO, don't have usernames AND emails at sign up. Choose one.
* Needs padding on either side. Other formatting issues too, but that was the most glaring one.
I recall in the multiple post-pandemic layoffs (especially in tech industry) that hiring teams were some of the first to be gutted. Made sense on a practical level since, at least in theory, layoffs > fewer job openings > fewer applicants to go through > less people needed to go through them.
However, I'm sure that's also led to more people applying for the fewer job openings that are available.
Does that seem like an accurate read? Maybe a contributing factor to lack of communication, even if it's simply a templated decline?