1,135 karma · joined January 26, 2014
https://online.stanford.edu/courses/sohs-ystatslearning-stat...
There is no such thing as a sentence, or a phrase, or a part
of speech, or even a "word"---these are all pareidolic
fantasies occasioned by glints of sunlight we see reflected
on the surface of the ocean of language; fantasies that we
comfort ourselves with when faced with language's infinite
and unknowable variability.
'Pareidolic' is my new favourite word.But I also sometimes enjoy reading posts I disagree with, and posts from people who aren't part of my "tribe". If Facebook had a knob that could amplify the stuff it thinks I won’t like (less Bernie Sanders, more conservative talk radio! less wedding pictures, more farmville invites!), I’d turn it once in a while, just to go on a little social vacation.
Does anyone have any concrete experience with the program?
It sounds to me like this 'ink drop' is a metaphor to explain some state-of-the-art dimensionality reduction technique. Does anyone know the common name of this technique?
You could certainly make the case for "expressive individuality" in the program making the art, especially if it was written by just one person. But computer programs, IMHO, fail the "valid art" test for other reasons. Of Dutton's twelve criteria they miss at least two: representation (6) and emotional saturation (9).
I always found this fact fascinating. Why would I attribute different levels of worth to two artifacts that were totally identical, save for their method of construction?
I didn't have a good answer to this until I read a book by aesthetician Dennis Dutton (The Art Instinct). Dutton presents a 12 factor model of art, and claims that artifacts exhibiting all 12 criteria tend to be unambiguously judged as "valid art", while artifacts that miss some but exhibit most are considered "edge cases", things that reasonable people can dispute the artistic validity of.
One of Dutton's 12 criteria is "expressive individuality". Most art objects are the products of a single person's imagination. Computer generated art tends to lack this trait, and this, I think, is why it feels less valid than human-made art.
Here's an outline of the 12-factor model: http://www.aristos.org/aris-10/dutton.htm
This paragraph is mystifying. Can someone explain what he's talking about here?
[1]: http://www.patient.co.uk/health/presbyacusis-hearing-loss-of...
Johan Sundberg has excellent examples of this "stretched" tuning in some of his talks. He claims that musicians stretch intervals intentionally in order to add excitement to particular passages. The link below contrasts equally tempered and "stretched" versions of the same musical phrases.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxFVjKMsaTc&t=50m32s
To my ears the stretched versions are far more engaging, especially the example with the tenor Jussi Bjorling around 52:50.
It seems incredibly foolish to give this information to ANYONE over the internet. Why should I trust Datacoop with it? That's not a rhetorical question.
They're 67 quadrillion times more expensive, but they're all natural and locally-sourced.
>From 2000 to 2009, no province had lower so-called “firm entry” than Quebec. In fact, in the manufacturing, retail, transportation and finance sectors, more companies went away than were created. No other province had that level of “destruction” without the customarily accompanying “creative.”
http://www.macleans.ca/economy/business/why-quebec-business-...
I started practicing mindfulness meditation a few years ago. Mindfulness trains you to experience your emotions without judging them; in other words, it helps you to "live with" feelings like frustration and anxiety without getting overwhelmed by them. It's been an invaluable addition to my programming toolkit.
I'd wager that software engineering is one of these "specific specialties" in which there really is a genuine shortage.