Datacoup – Unlock the Value of Your Personal Data
datacoup.com
datacoup.com
It seems incredibly foolish to give this information to ANYONE over the internet. Why should I trust Datacoop with it? That's not a rhetorical question.
I don't make any purchases with my debit card, so I would only link my credit card, which has pretty solid fraud protection. I'd probably be more way about cash accounts.
My bank tries to drill it into me that I should NEVER, EVER give my password to any third party, including employees of the bank. This behaviour from Datacoup certainly seems like a big red flag to me.
They do say this, though:
"Datacoup neither sees nor stores any bank or credit card user login information such as username or password. The communication to the bank is hashed and the access point is tokenized, which means we cannot decipher a password even if we wanted to. Datacoup never sees nor stores account or routing numbers."
(http://datacoup.com/docs#security)
Did they redirect you first to a secure web page from the bank, and is it this page which asked for the credentials? If what they say above is true, then (I think) this is the only way in which this should happen.
By giving credentials AND cc numbers to a 3rd party (something credit card issuers say never to do), I'm in-effect condoning any actions that happen even if I don't make those actions.
Isn't it like handing the CC issuer a signed letter stating they need not worry about fraud protection, as I'm authorizing all transactions and will agree to cover them?
From an attack angle, now I have to trust that Datacoup will remain secure in all its interactions and that they will never suffer intrusions or decide to change their stance in the future (acquisition?).
I see nothing good coming of this request.
I doubt if Datacoup would drain your accounts. More like a bad actor breaking into Datacoup's DB would drain your accounts.
What DOES concern me as that the whole purpose of this service is to correlate data about you that is otherwise behind locked doors and explicitly keeping identity information intact. The services profit from your data and it's sale would far far out way any individuals.
This space of personal data monetization is a huge trust exercise. The relationship has be developed with the user, almost at an individual level, for them to share their data from across platforms. Many of us are more willing to part, based on the knowledge that it's already happening and we should take part if we want something in return. While others are more hesitant and need to see the value (or other's adopting) before jumping in. And there are many others who it doesn't speak to at all - this includes folks who go out of their way to never post a photo of them online. To each their own :)
The path is evolving though, where users will have more control and gain an increasing amount of value from their data. But it's a longer term game - because the trust needed to get to the intimate information about users takes time to develop but is priceless once it's there.
Disclaimer: I am the co-founder of Powr of You (www.powrofyou.com), startup in the same space.
The main insight I got when doing customer interviews was that many people don't like the idea of others accessing their data when its raised to the foreground, but are perfectly ok with it when it's "hidden". The other issue is that the amount of cash required to make this interesting for the avg. person is relatively high.
On the business side, when interviewing VPs Marketing/Sales, the #1 question asked was "What additional value does this bring beyond what we already have?". This is a valuable question to answer b/c massive amounts of data are already collected on each one of us. To be valuable, a business like Datacoup needs to convert this data into insight that can be used to help companies to sell more.
With all of that said, I hope Datacoup is successful. It's a great idea and one that I personally like.
It's true that massive amounts of data are being collected, but the better value proposition for customers to sign up is: "Billions of dollars are spent by companies on advertising; you deserve a slice of that."
>The other issue is that the amount of cash required to make this interesting for the avg. person is relatively high.
I also ran into the exact same dichotomy when sussing out this idea, namely that people don't mind monetization of their data exhaust/patterns "for free" or in nominal exchange for a foreground service, but being asked to give this in direct exchange for monetary compensation makes them demand a very high premium for the exact same data.
EDIT: Personal.com is establishing a track record of securely consolidating and storing sensitive information. I can't help but think that controlled sharing of personal information (extending beyond core password/address/credit card/banking details) will be their next big push.
Data vaults like DataCoup are in essence trying to appeal to purchasers by initially demonstrating large reach (similar to newspaper/magazine/website exposure to raw number of eyeballs), and up-sell the ability to more quickly and more accurately zone in on attractive demographics, down to the individual level, than a competing 3rd party ad-broker harvesting browser fingerprints + cookie combinations or Amazon/Google.
Form example, individuals may eventually sell a list of companies they: "have bought from; may buy in the future; commit $X to buying within 90 days."
Also, individuals can be made aware that prices for their information tuple assets may devalue if they specify faulty or inaccurate information (e.g. selling information stating that they would buy $X from a company in category Y within 90 days, but failing to actually follow-through). This is rather similar to a credit score, except a "purchaser" or "consumer" score may be a more accurate description.
This isn't to say that everybody would choose to participate in such a program or give up such information willingly, but at least this level of hyper-personalization and ad-bidding would become available (in theory!) to both the data purchaser and the end-customer, eventually.
EDIT: Data vaults all aim to become canonical ad-broker exchanges as the next step in the evolution of agency ad & media trading desks[1]. If this sounds like trading in the financial sense, it absolutely is. No coincidence that the founder of DataCoup is an ex-bond trader[2].
[1] http://www.adexchanger.com/Agency_Trading_White_Paper.pdf
[1] http://www.technologyreview.com/news/524621/sell-your-person...
Uhm...
I use the word 'uneducated' because presumably the working hypothesis is that once data-awareness is raised (i.e. "you can actually get paid to share your data!"), the corresponding market-price of various personal information tuples/assets will rise.
EDIT: As a single other data point, AT&T's cable division called U-Verse is offering a fiber plan called GigaPower that effectively pays subscribers $29/mo for their participation in the AT&T GigaPower Internet Preferences (i.e. consensual data-mining) Program[1]. The "payment" is offered in the form of a price delta between the Premier (i.e. data-mined) tier for $70/mo, or the Standard tier for $99/mo[2]. So, at least one large corporation believes that household web browsing data is worth $29/month which is a good proxy for a price ceiling on how much personal data could be worth in the medium term.
[1] http://www.att.com/esupport/article.jsp?sid=KB421828&cv=812#...
[2] http://www.eweek.com/small-business/att-u-verse-with-gigapow...
1. http://www.technologyreview.com/news/524621/sell-your-person...
Have not tried giving them access to my debit/credit cards, that would definitely raise the reward but now sure by how much.