40 karma · joined January 11, 2012
https://steveblank.com/2010/01/25/whats-a-startup-first-prin...
Specifically, I've been really curious to understand the relationship between faith and anxiety/depression. You see a surge of mindfulness and meditative practices in the Bay Area that appear like secular replacements for how "faith" in the Judeo-Christian tradition helps people face the unknown and the fundamental uncertainty of the universe.
There's good evidence that ketogenic diets have an additive metabolic effect beyond pure calorie restriction which is exciting. Virta Health is doing some interesting work here and just published some results that speak to this: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs13300-018-0373-...
The problem though is that absent these religious ideologies, we're left with a number of core questions that secular philosophy has been unable to answer convincingly. Namely:
- Where does value stem from? What is good? What is bad? - What is the meaning or purpose of life? - Why is there something instead of nothing? What was the original cause? Was there one? - What happens after we die?
This dovetails with a number of practical issues in today's world. (1) Lots of suicide and depression. There are 30 million prescriptions of Zoloft written in the United States. Many of these folks (I assume) aren't suffering some sort of pathological illness but find themselves looking at a world that appears to be devoid of meaning when these religious frameworks break down for them (i.e. nihilism) (2) Religious extremism that manifests in sectarian violence and war.
Ultimately, secular thought (agnosticism and atheism included) is just an inferior product compared to religions. It doesn't provide out-of-the-box answers to these really hard questions and as a result can be a very scary and lonely ideology.
Relevant point: I'd love to see academic philosophy working to shore up these areas and provide folks a better, clearer framework in which they can live meaningful, enjoyable lives that doesn't require a religious framework.
http://www.pewforum.org/2015/05/12/americas-changing-religio...
From my personal observations, younger folks are spending a lot more time on Instagram and Snapchat, and a lot less time on FB and Twitter. And on Instagram, a lot of Snapchat content gets re-posted with their username in the comments.
Also, the amount of content I see created by people on Snapchat is way larger than what you see anywhere else. The expectation of curation is much lower so engagement is higher.
A few things about the product that I really like that illustrate Snapchat's transformation into a revenue generating business:
- The new "Live" stories from different places around the world are amazing and one of the most intimate forms of cultural exchange outside of physically visiting a place that I've experienced. Advertising has started in these streams already.
- The attempt with Discover to replace conventional TV programming with a mobile-first format is bold and has the potential to grow as younger folks find themselves consuming more media on their phones and as Snapchat builds out better relationships with content creators in the LA area.
- Snapcash is a smart first attempt at getting people's payment information so that peer-to-peer but eventually brand driven commerce can happen on the platform.
This is distinct than the company becoming profitable; many companies will increase in value while not being profitable.
The original commenter is making this comment I presume because he/she thinks Spotify is a mature enough business where it should be generating profits instead of operating at a deficit in order to grow and grab market share.
That said, there's nothing really nefarious here. Users accept a standard dialogue to access the app that exchanges their data and contact info for music. Making someone tweet for lyrics is kind of lame but it's still the user's choice to do so.