soledades

>has deep philosophical implications, but even that I wouldn't say has implications for "the nature of reality."

what would be an example of "deep philosophical" implication that has no bearing on the "nature of reality"

This but less insultingly.

I think that the branding of the UNABOMBER as a "bad guy" is pretty secure at this point.

> to ignore that the social title and distinction of the person has been affected by their transition to 'convict' status is to ignore a facet of what the prosecution was attempting to achieve for the sake of the victims.

why on earth should that take precedence over everything else?

wow, quite the quote adjudicator, aren't we? where does your krishnamurti lineage come from, may i ask?

have you ever heard of an eastern philosopher who didn't think western civilization was profoundly sick??

it's deeply immoral that we force kids to sit in chairs for hours a day, and then diagnose them with "the ADHDs" when they don't like it. but we could multiple examples endlessly...

1. We admitted we were powerless over alcohol — that our lives had become unmanageable.

2. Some dude said "no don't worry about any of that higher power shit, your higher power can just be a doorknob"

3. ???

4. Profit

yes, i noticed that when i looked up the term and saw what it meant, it helped my understanding of the topic.

for anyone too lazy to read: no you can't visit

also car-oriented planning is a primary driver of high cost of living in the first place, due to its abysmal space-efficiency.

> 30 restaurants within a few square miles

that would be a low number for a middling town in the pre-car era.

im sorry to tell you but this take is simply ignoring the fact the amount of restuaurants you can walk to increases with the square of the density.

stay gold, ponyboy

well at least occham's razor is definitely calling buttshit

off topic

hahaha those dogs are definitely living their best life

um, they're both food, are they not?

and yeah salame definitely better.

really into this thread now.

what does bologna being heavily processed have to do with "bullshit" though?

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

…ok?

Idk, it’s stretching things a bit to say web servers are “one thing.”

Agree with you in general, but in this particular case, I am glad there is an alternative to Genie.jl.

That’s one hell of a leap there, friend.

Not really sure how you would get the sense that his “real target” is significance testing.

Seemed much more just an interesting history of how authority, power, and bad science can intertwine, to disastrous effect.

I think the implication was that the “poker table” is sometimes just in your mind.

Metaphors suck, I know

I ...don't think that's actually a dealbreaker.

If the context is currencies, everyone would know that a european union flag refers to the euro.

it's a visual cue, not a translation into hieroglyphics.

you're in a weird context.

Oligarch does not mean "a powerful rich person"

might have something to do with the fact that you misrepresented the entire other side of the argument, and in such gratingly hyperbolic fashion... the doublethink is unreal.

literally no one would disagree that "parents have some responsibility towards their children."

If not many people use it, there will be much less incentive to shill

But maybe the signal is even better in the subpopulation

"You can't write it down in terms of basic arithmetic"

That said, humans are capable of echolocation with practice and it is commonplace in some cultures.