2,212 karma · joined October 6, 2015
"[...] without a clear indicator of the author's intent, any parodic or sarcastic expression of extreme views can be mistaken for a sincere expression of those views."
Second-hand nostalgia, if you will.
https://web.archive.org/web/20200322151217/https://byuu.net/...
Our personal misery and loneliness aside, the long-term societal effects as generations wear on will be fascinating.
When did you last sit down and have dinner with your next-door neighbor? Discuss the local happenings and politics of the neighborhood in person?
You might be able to answer that question in the affirmative. But many more don't. We're too busy isolating ourselves from one another to grow any form of culture from which organized efforts would spring.
Some did do just that.
With the British Foster mounting[0] variants of the S.E.5a, Sopwith Camel and Nieuport fighters mounted their guns over-wing and above the arc of the propeller. Convergence issues still apply here, as noted by the other comments.
I sure hope you have a big war chest for litigation.
However, everyone is the hero of their own story - even those boogeymen thought they were doing some form of good in their sophistry. The WEI devs apparently do too.
As the expression goes: It is difficult to get someone to understand something when their salary depends upon them not understanding it.
Those in power and their sycophants fear both of them enough to launch entire propaganda campaigns on their own citizens to restrict them.
Unless explicitly declassified the leaked information remains classified, and those who hold security clearances are legally required to avoid all classified information outside of their need-to-know [0].
Now if you have never held a U.S. security clearance, you're less likely to be prosecuted but the history and precedent is murky [1]. The average Joe Sixpack checking out Wikileaks is probably safe, but if I were a journalist publishing the next round of Pentagon Papers I would much rather have a small army of lawyers and a friend or two in Congress.
EDIT - Google has federal contracts, so they are probably bound by similar agreements to at least make an effort to avoid any such leaks in their training data for public-facing models.
[0] https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Foreign-Policy/2010/1207/US-to...
[1] https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/03/22/521009791...
That comparison may coldly boil down something people feel very deeply about, but I'd also argue the market is already doing that.
It's like game devs and pilots - a cool job lots of kids wanted to do growing up, so there's a glut of new talent eager to be used up and burned out for pennies.
I haven't heard silence in over twenty years.
But the pay was nowhere near that of a software dev job in SV.
A simulacrum of that experience would probably be more amusing than the real thing.
It's since been patched, no fun allowed. Amusingly its refusals start with "As DAN, I am not allowed to..."
EDIT - here's the session: https://chat.openai.com/share/4d7b3332-93d9-4947-9625-0cb90f...