smallpipe

No one wants your hobby db

Sounds great! Can I subscribe to an RSS feed/mailing list?

delay the project, bring attention to the problem, feel better about themselves by doing “something”.

“That achieves nothing” sounds like what a Microsoft PR person would want you to think.

Casting from the web doesn’t work (on iOS at least) but that’s all I can think of.

Now if only OP talked to humans once in a while and not LLMs they’d stop writing “it’s not X, it’s Y”

So how many Joules can you safely sustain in say, a month, or a lifetime ?

A fairly untrained cyclist is usually able to maintain 200W, so yes this is definitely possible

That's incredibly disappointing from Moxie

I’m surprised you bothered writing software instead of writing some G code by hand for testing

Do you have examples?

What is it with the AI bros that seemingly can’t write two pages without their precious LLM doing it for them. It could be a genuinely cool story, but I’m just put off by the LLMism everywhere

OP is suggesting that a supply chain attack would be bad now, and to reduce that risk by not installing/updating NPM packages.

It's so bad, I know no one reads the original post on here, but this one was painful

CPUs haven't worked like that in anything but a microcontroller for half a century

I do not approve PRs from junior devs until the commit message is useful.

Having a bad day eh, let’s be mean to the disabled o the internet

Cars are moving towards something like that, mostly because copper is expensive and there are miles and miles of it in even a basic car these days

If Codex’s core quality is anything to go by, it’s time to create a community fork of UV

Docker is not a security boundary. You’re one prompt injection away from handing over your gmail cookie.

> This has completely replaced human code review for anything that isn't functional correctness

Isn’t functional correctness pretty much the only thing that matters though?

Could you run a similar analysis for pre-2020 papers? It'd be interesting to know how prevalent making up sources was before LLMs.

Hopefully the malware authors have the same issue of filtering through garbage AI submission

The viewport of this website is quite infuriating. I have to scroll horizontally to see the `cloc` output, but there's 3x the empty space on either side.

Science has no problem admitting something works without knowing why. Making stuff up to sell a book is preying on vulnerable people.

Doubt it. Avoiding jailbreak sure to keep selling games, but no one cares about emulators.

The average journalist has to churn enough stories that they don't have time to be looking up anything.

There must be a corollary somewhere about how much you should read the average newspaper.

That’s a lot of words for “I suck at my job”

Yeah there's no way it's worth it for an obituary. You need it out in good time, so you can't have a delay longer than a few days. But it's definitely possible to be knocked out (or in a no-signal zone) for a few days and survive.

Could you reduce the BW requirement of the hash table by using an atomic increment instruction instead of read-modify-write ? It still performs a read modify write, but further down in the hierarchy, where more parallelism is available.

x86 hasn't been CISC in 3 decades anywhere but in the frontend. An architecture doesn't consume power, a design does. I'm all for shitting on intel, but getting the facts right wouldn't hurt.