Also, it'd be interesting how many pre-2020 papers their "AI detector" marks as AI-generated. I distrust LLMs somewhat, but I distrust AI detectors even more.

Yeah, it’s kind of meaningless to attribute this to AI without measuring the base rate.

It’s for sure plausible that it’s increasing, but I’m certain this kind of thing happened with humans too.

at the end of the article they made a clear distinction between flawed and hallucinated cititations. I feels its hard to argue that through a mistake a hallucinated citation emerge:

> Real Citation Yann LeCun, Yoshua Bengio, and Geoffrey Hinton. Deep learning. nature, 521:436-444, 2015.

Flawed Citation

Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and Geoff Hinton. Deep leaning. nature, 521(7553):436-444, 2015.

Hallucinated Citation

Samuel LeCun Jackson. Deep learning. Science & Nature: 23-45, 2021.