1,118 karma · joined January 20, 2024
.. but I doubt you've have a rational basis for a belief that Central America in particular is likely to be one of the regions that will become dryer.
Is your belief rationally based?
From NASA: Increased evaporation will result in more frequent and intense storms, but will also contribute to drying over some land areas.
Don't know if Central America in particular will dry out in the long term. Was just using it as an example of the types of migrations that will come from global warming. Please try to understand the overall point and not pedantically nitpick.
New Mexico can’t build desalination plants. Probably a good idea to not allow water intensive crops to be grown there that are exported.
Mass migrations can be handled by destroying all the layers of laws that NIMByYs use.
It’s rational for a country to not have open borders and allow anyone to just come. It’s also rational to not allow more people to come in than what the citizens are comfortable with. It’s going to be much more Darwinian in the future.
India, for instance, isn’t going to be able account 200 million climate refugees from Bangladesh.
Supply side Jesus appreciates you.
greed drives people to try to improve, to get the most out of what they have.
Salk was not good at what he did because of greed. Leonardo was not great becuase of greed and being more greedy would not have made him better.
Greed is not good. All ethical traditions recognize this. Your view is pathetic. The actual Jesus does not appreciate you.
The analogy to tides is not apt.
Here are my leftist views: No one should have more than $10 million of wealth. Everyone should have a place to live, food, and healthcare. Healthcare should be free at the point of usage. The U.S. should stop funding Israel. Higher education should be free. Churches should pay tax on the property they own. Donations to charity should not be tax deductible. Public transportation should be heavily subsidized and greatly expanded. The DOD and CIA and NSA should be greatly reduced in size and scope. Elections should be publicly funded so that each candidate gets an equal amount of funding. Abortion should be legalized everywhere. Homeschooling should be outlawed.
People buy shirts that say “I’d rather be Russian than a liberal.” The demonization of the opposing ideology goes both ways. Everything you wrote applies to conservatives as well.
Trump lusts after his own daughter and if that alone doesn’t qualify him as a shitty person to his supporters then they clearly value ideology over the truth and morality.
If the true enemy is the opposing ideology then the vileness of the candidate of your ideology is overlooked by many people. It’s not a good state of affairs for so many people to view an entire ideology as evil and the enemy.
Donald Trump is a piece of shit. So is Bill Clinton. AOC is a good person. So is Mitt Romney.
EDIT: I am wrong about Cook not tweeting when Biden won. I don’t think such tweets were newsworthy when Biden won but maybe I’m wrong. It feels to me like there is a need by the monied class to massage Trump’s ego. Maybe I’m blinded by bias in this regard and my perception is completely wrong.
Overall my post was a knee jerk reaction and not well thought out.
And doing anything to upset capital is heresy.
When in Ferenginar do as the Ferengi.