Edit: actually I'm well into my second year of programming now, time flies...
946 karma · joined May 2, 2017
Edit: actually I'm well into my second year of programming now, time flies...
> It's harder to focus on learning a single thing perfectly with all the noise out there
Preach! I've definitely flipflopped languages and target positions based on a combination of reading posts here (and on Reddit), and a few damning/exciting articles or blog posts - not that I'd admit that at the time. I continue to seriously consider various levels of disconnection from the web, from blocking a couple of sites, to editing my hosts file, to using my routers child-blocking settings (block device by time, website etc)...
I studied a fair bit of CS, but in a fairly shallow way (it's been a decade since my last maths lesson).
This year I proved to myself I could learn lots - next year is proving I can do the same, just in one or two things!
B) The productivity industry is a total sham and a net drain on productivity. It's mostly social manipulation. The industry takes attention away from the things productivity is a side effect of, such as level of control, overall health, and level of insight into oneself. This is partially due to -
C) All texts/advice/systems put minor spins on a couple of templates, and most of the good ones steal from Marcus Aurelius. Whichever flavour of system fits the fashion of the day the best becomes 'the best' because reasons.
D) The definition of 'productive' is so absurdly narrow and restricted in the late-capitalist hegemony as to render most of humanity utterly useless. Clearly, they're not [1]. It's more about raising members of a certain class with a certain personality profile [2] up to the status of a golden cow.
[1] for example, parenting is a fairly productive activity.
[2] that is, two things we're lucky to be able to change a lot about.
OTOH, if your article is 3k words, I'll be gone if your 'relatable hook' appears to be a third of the article. Weave it in, be didactic!
I would like to read a convincing account of how M$ would extend and extinguish the Linux kernel (or GNU userland for that matter). All I can imagine they care about is a) making sure Azure succeeds and b) getting users on monthly subscriptions for everything.
It's not that I don't believe the latter 2 of the 3 E's aren't plausible, I just haven't read a convincing account of what they could feasibly be and why M$ would have that incentive beyond spite. Satya Nadella seems like a paragon of neo-liberalism (everybody should be nice and get along, just let us maximise profits).
My next step is to make a personal website with some contact details and a scraper script for the links in the HN top 30-40 that I can run as a cronjob.
While cutting social media is not a panacea, I have found a significant improvement in the amount of free time I have, and I don't compulsively think about what other people are doing.
It's a good exercise to assume that engagement in social media is work and multiply how many hours you've sunk into it by your usual hourly wage...
http://www.duncantrussell.com/episodes/2016/9/14/dr-cole-mar...
I can't believe I'm saying this on HN, looks like it's finally just another subreddit: I have plenty experience, sure.
A good rule of thumb -- if you feel like you might be addicted, you probably are.
> I'm wondering what the solution is. I tried blocking HN in my host file, but I found worse ways to waste my time on the internet. Maybe a reading later app is it, but I doubt it.
I've struggled with this an extreme amount over the years (on Reddit and here and so on). The most successful strategy so far is to partition my hard drive and install several different Linux distributions, each with different purposes (currently NixOS: work, Deepin: casual browsing, OpenELEC: watching stuff). I've different emails, firefox signins and so on. It can be irritating, but sometimes you just want that. Getting pissed off - I mean really, really pissed off - about being influenced by websites which optimise for stealing neurons can be very useful.
At some point I think it was intended to be like a 'coding-oriented IQ test', after you'd passed a set of HR checkboxes. Obviously an IQ test you study carefully for is not a broadly applicable measure of relative performance. As far as I understand, many of the top companies are shifting away from this interview paradigm, but it'll take the rest of the industry which adopted it a long time to catch up (I imagine).
I have a feeling the power of contrast is at work, though I'm not really 'into' gaming enough to bring much evidence to bear.
I'm self-studying and have been working through 'the Dragon book', regarding compilers. I like Lisp due to beginning my learning with HtDP and SICP, and the functional paradigm appeals to me. I'm just beginning K&R C, and Kernighan's Unix Programming Environment. Naturally I'm really excited to find this here so I'll definitely be working through it.
Were I more concerned about ticking boxes on my CV for the person in HR then I probably wouldn't bother.
I've wasted about 6 months on distractions from following fashions and persuasive writing/videos, and now know a little bit of a bunch of popular languages and some CS and IT and already feel a bit burned out (as I'm stretched in so many directions - sorry for the mixed metaphor!).
In the past couple of weeks I've nuked my windows installation and have an Arch+i3 setup where I try to use CLI wherever I can. I've limited myself to following CS61A (the famous SICP course), HtDP, and I leaf through a book I have on Rust, typing out examples and steeping my brain in healthy confusion. The difference in my rate of learning is astounding: not because I'm suddenly better at research, but because I'm better at filtering. What an age to live in!
If you include a semantics for supervaluationism (Sorites paradox, Keefe on vagueness)!
Thinking of it, I'd love to train a NN against human responses to '"is this a heap, yes/no?" +/-1 grain, repeat'.
As an avid speedcuber I'd be very interested in the datasets.
In regards to algorithmic hooks (nice shorthand, I'm borrowing that), there are various extensions available on the major browsers which block comments, the sidebar, videos loading in the player at the end of the video, etc.
I am finally quite happy with my defence kit, I should write about it somewhere. /r/nosurf has plenty of tips anyway.
Gaming is ubiquitous, in another decade I imagine that attitude will be on the way out.
Those are the obvious points though, I think it's more interesting to think about how the mechanical and repetitive aspects of gaming replace a naive, deep drive for precise actions which demand focus and skill, and move chaotic or unordered things towards some goal. In the 20thC that was probably fixing cars or working in a factory or building stuff. Good ways for satisfying the drive, if you have it.
And in a nice continuation of this relationship, the more that AI replaces work, the more I think leisure, work and gaming will coincide. Many gaming environments are good examples of behavioural economics in action: incentives, rewards, how changes to game balance (even perceived changes to balance) or the price/availability of cosmetics nudge or shove player behaviour... We could stab guesses at how to implement these patterns in a way that considers them economic activity.
I don't think gaming necessarily has to be 'better' than life for it to take up a great deal of it. It just has to have the right kinds of 'APIs' to satisfy that messy, obsessive, predatory/reward-loop hunger which appears in most men and plenty of women.
My central thesis is that a couple of decades leads us basically to the Matrix (though I'm hoping for a sunnier version).
About as accurate as you'll ever get.
But at the same time I totally get what you mean.