395 karma · joined July 24, 2013
Funnily enough I somehow ranked #1 for "ADHD" but I don't know what's particularly special about my landing page. Does your crawler look prioritize/crawl HN by any chance?
Surprised nothing happened to him.
I wrote it with Microsoft Word. I initially tried a few different apps but all of the organizational tools they provided got in the way. I broke most conventions and just wrote the book straight from start to finish, and re-read it countless times until I felt satisfied. Then I sent it to a ton of friends who helped me edit. A professional editor would've been a better idea, but I didn't really have the money for that at the time.
Recorded the audiobook myself too.
Also, it made me realize how much sugar/HFCS/etc. is in everything.
I have a feeling the next few decades of research will make us realize how horrible our diets are.
If you're picking a framework that will eventually be used by developers who might not have any design skills, which would you prefer?
Tachyons shadows: https://tachyons.io/docs/themes/box-shadow/
Tailwind shadows: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/box-shadow
Tachyons colors: http://tachyons.io/docs/themes/skins/
Tailwind colors: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/customizing-colors
Even something like floats look better in Tailwind documentation despite being the same one line of CSS.
Tachyons floats: http://tachyons.io/docs/layout/floats/
Tailwind floats: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/float
Part of it is marketing and part of it is the novelty of using inline utility classes, but none of this explosive growth happens without a deep focus on design at every stage.
Documentation, defaults, examples, and color palettes all matter.
This is somewhat apples to oranges, but look at Bootstraps' navbar example page versus Tailwind's (paid) examples. One is a cluttered mess, the other is a carefully designed list.
Bootstrap 5 navbars: https://getbootstrap.com/docs/5.1/examples/headers/
TailwindUI navbars: https://tailwindui.com/components/application-ui/navigation/...
Now that I've typed that out, it almost doesn't make much sense. But that's how it fit together in my brain.
ADHD is different for everyone, but basically an ADHD-friendly job is one where "maintenance" or "routine" tasks are not an expectation. I.e. keeping API documentation up-to-date every week is not a good Wildcard task. If you need someone to do that work, don't hire a Wildcard. If you need someone to do a little bit of everything (i.e. Chief of Staff type role) then it's a better fit.
Right now I've been able to speak directly with hiring managers/CEOs who are instantly on-board and "get it" after reading the blog post. My hope is that the clear messaging is actively driving away people who want to hire non-Wildcards. I make it clear on the Job Creation page that you will only receive applicants of a certain type. But that's just what I'm hoping happens. If it starts to drift away from that, I'll have to figure out how to vet employers better. I don't want people like me getting jobs that cause suffering.
I'd rather make 10x less money than compromise on the mission.
There is going to be a huge advantage for companies that realize this. Massive untapped demand for jobs that recognize different ways of getting work done.
I wrote a blog post (https://beta.wildcardpeople.com/what-is-a-wildcard-person) about how people with ADHD tend to do work, and I'm finding random people on LinkedIn putting it right in their bio.
Calling it "Wildcard People" removed the gatekeeping/"medical" aspect while maintaining expectations of how these candidates end up doing their work.
I don't blame people for going for the easy money, but it's like paying "writers" to write thousands of articles about "best pool equipment 2021" to target keywords on Google just so you can soak up Amazon affiliate revenue. Sure you make money, but how many people are reading your "blog" as fact?
My book is geared towards people who want to complete side projects and have better strategies at work, without reducing the scope of their goals or quality of work. I explain how to take a mindful approach to ADHD symptoms rather than chaotically bouncing from hyperfocus to burn-out.
When I started in tech, I had a difficult time focusing on the right tasks at work. Sometimes I would hyperfocus and complete an entire week's work in one day, but most of the time, I was suffering and fighting myself to keep focused. Context switching was a tremendous drain on my energy, and my organization was chaotic at best.
I felt like shit all the time.
Two years ago, I started interviewing other "out" ADHD professionals to see what they were doing to manage. My goal was to be productive AND happy at the same time. I succeeded.
I found several patterns from these interviews and started compiling notes. I was also shocked at how poor our experiences were with therapy! The majority said therapy was NOT helpful with ADHD.
Other ADHD books seemed to be focused on "coping" rather than thriving, or they made overzealous claims about ADHD being a "superpower". It's a neurodevelopmental disorder with pros and cons, not magic.
When the pandemic hit, I quit my job and started writing. I took my own advice, and this project has been completed with minimal stress. I can't believe I'm actually launching something that I didn't have to grind on. I was able to maintain sustainable productivity, and I think you can too.
If you have (or think you have) ADHD, I think this book can help you build a better strategy for how to maintain happy productivity while avoiding burn-out.
The book is DRM free and available in all major e-book formats, and the companion videos are all recorded at 1080p 60fps.
"Just get started" is good advice sometimes, but in your case it sounds like you're burnt out, in which case you can't get started so easily.
Rather than doing brain hacks or productivity "tips", try doing _less_. Instead of aiming for massive bursts of productivity, try doing a tiny bit at a time. If you miss a day, who cares.
You are under no productivity "debt". You're studying and learning, these are creative processes that have a daily limit.
Finally, a sustainable level of motivation should feel like you're "kind of hungry", not that you're obsessed. I have ADHD, and sometimes I fool myself into thinking I'm no longer "passionate" about something because I'm no longer in a hyperfocus phase. In reality, healthy long-term productivity is much less extreme than obsessive hyperfocus.