1,554 karma · joined September 12, 2018
https://www.bejarano.io
Be safe!
It is the balance I like. I don't own one (yet).
That's all.
I didn't want to explain that in the article because I don't think it adds value.
I suggest you read up on the SMS protocol, basically anyone on the network, if able to inject any arbitrary packet into it, can.
If you don't even want to buy equipment or even code, take a look at AWS SNS or (i believe) Twilio too.
What I ask is for iOS and Android to have the "this message was not verified" warning, as shown in the last screenshot, whenever the sender ID is displayed without any form of verification (such as, the aforementioned country-specific sender ID registries).
If browsers show "not secure" unless verified by SSL, apps should show "not verified" unless verified _somehow_.
The "how" may or may not be possible at this moment, but in any case, warn by default.
Is that naive?
Imagine what that could look like with voice AI getting better and better.
Binary size is the main issue with Go WASM, the binary on this is 4MB, and it only does templating.
TinyGo won't work because it doesn't have reflect (which I need for parsing arbitrary JSON).
But I'll give it a spin. Thanks!
What I could add, though, is a bunch of "standard" functions (like the ones found in Hugo, for example).
Noted!
1. makes it harder for those who earned it to get the boost they need; and
2. will cause this very site to fail right after it succeeds.
I get the idea, and I think the intentions are great, but I don't think the means are net positive.
Absolutely life-changing book.
He also made a MasterClass.com video course with the same content, if you'd rather watch than read.
If anything, Catalan is a dialect of Valencian since Valencian precedes Catalan. Source: look it up.
Catalans are taught a different story in school, which makes most of them believe your statement. Source: I am from Catalonia and I was taught Valencian to be one of Catalan's dialects, until I met some friends from Valencia who educated me on the subject.
It does the job, but very poorly. Same as LastPass.
I use 1Password now. If I didn't want to pay for it I'd use KeePass.
That's senior-level decision making right there!
Storing creds is tough, all your users already have Google accounts, and most of them probably prefer logging in with a click rather than remembering a new set of creds. It also puts a higher barrier of entry for fraud, since new Google accounts require phone number verification.
I'm a SRE so if you need ideas for the hosting/infrastructure side of things, feel free to ask!
I prefer to be billed whatever it costs but have my service up all the time.
Lets you choose which users/machines/tags can talk to who. Tags are like groups.
In most large orgs, updating public status pages are whole 30+ minute process, as the message must be explained to the customer care team, drafted, vetted if it's something worthy of appearing in HN, put into the application, reviewed before putting it live, then published.
There are some (all?) players in the status page business that can integrate monitoring sources with results live, but no one will use those for fear of publishing downtime when there's not.
As a customer, I'd rather you report fake downtime than fake uptime, but that's how it is.
The reason Chrome is so fast, is most likely thanks to the performance (harmless) data it collects. Firefox may be proud of not collecting as much data, but (at least on macOS) they spend twice the battery to render twice as slow.
Not saying you shouldn't be able to choose what data you're collected (which, you are) but there are reasons (not necessarily evil) to get that data to the devs.
But beware, Chrome's lead on render speed is most likely thanks to the performance data they collect. Any other browser you may choose might not collect that data, but don't be surprised if it halves your battery life and takes twice the time to render stuff (such as Firefox in macOS about 6 months ago, don't know how it performs now).
There are reasons for data collection, and I don't think everything is used for malitious intent, which is DDG's point.
Is browsing history being used as evidence in criminal prosecution? Where? How?
At this point, I think mine is more of a nihilism towards this as I cut everything at the only reliable level: the network. But even then, I've hammered myself way too much over privacy, and it didn't make me any happier, since, at the end of the day, if anyone wants to track you, they'll track you.