It's the market that is influencing social policies, politicians are just responding to that.
74 karma · joined June 13, 2016
It's the market that is influencing social policies, politicians are just responding to that.
Or as lifeformed put it elsewhere: "Destroying all civilization doesn't mean destroying all humans, but just the structures that hold society together. A runaway heating scenario may be a pretty effective way of doing that - all crops die, wars for food, nukes get used."
http://newscenter.lbl.gov/2008/09/17/impacts-on-the-threshol...
Pulling apart words and putting them back together is one of the more relatable demonstrations of intelligence, imo.
And as a patron, I appreciate receiving my December rewards near the end of December rather than mid-January.
Worst case: a patron could game the system and only pay half as much as other patrons for the same content. That would involve pledging and canceling repeatedly every other month. That is not a likely scenario, and still infinitely better than the previous worst case: patrons paying $0 for that premium content.
You could keep your charge date on the 1st of the month, and just not charge for that first month if they are charged up front. Let creators choose the length of their grace period: 3 days, 10 days, two weeks. Creators get paid, don't feel pressured to provide refunds, and patrons get a little sign-on discount.
I don't think the author is extrapolating her personal experience to the industry. Her experience is a personal example of a trend she had previously studied.
I think the author has more than her personal anecdote to back up her statement.
No telling how many regularly read the comments without contributing. Does anyone have lurker estimates?
The problem is when landlords terminate leases to convert to full-time AirBnB properties. That isn't efficient, it's adding another hotel to the 'cartel'.
Edit: er... Flappy Bird. I'm not sure what Flappy Go would look like.