697 karma · joined December 30, 2025
Gosh if only there was some sort of widely distributed network with transmitters all over the place that could get information to portable devices that people carried with them at all times and which can be woken up remotely even if they're otherwise asleep/turned off, we wouldn't need to push this obsolete century-old technology with a vague justification of "emergencies".
More seriously though, there's no direct API, but playing a recording of a massive $enemy attack, AI-faked broadcasts, cutting off comms as cities in the broadcasts get "nuked", and deepfaked AI calls authorising launches, and you don't need a REST API.
And it takes quite a bit to knock out a solar panel, they're designed to resist hail and storm damage (and careless shipping/installers) and will continue to function with reduced efficiency in the presence of quite a bit of damage, you'd need to systematically demolish every single panel in an entire city to take it offline.
> OpenBSD 7.6 shipped in October 2024; 7.7 is expected in April 2025.
> As of 2024, it passes the majority of GNU coreutils test suites
This is for an article dated September 2026. It's not obviously AI-written but the dates are completely out of sync, it's like a lot of it was written in 2024 and then other bits were added a week ago. A quick Google of the author's name also doesn't turn up anything that could be her, so possibly it is just AI slop.
Compare with the equivalent in architecture, https://www.worksinprogress.news/p/do-people-prefer-traditio..., in particular the two photos halfway down where non-architects overwhelmingly preferred the reasonably-pleasant design in the first photo while architects preferred Cell Block D in the second.
Actually it's not just Firefox, that's a ton of other stuff like that as well. In the Firefox case though, about:config and set browser.nova.enabled to false.
What I found amusing is that the article claiming bar codes are dead is being displayed on devices with dozens if not hundreds of components with bar codes (matrix codes) on them.
Just goes to show what happens when a world-leading science power lets political superstition overrule the science.
For me it's something involving aluminum and iron oxide powder. Probably where the term hot-rod came from.
We use SHA-1 in our storage mechanism, which predates git. There is a (quite long) written threat model. Someone being able to generate collisions with an enormous amount of effort under just the right conditions is not a threat under that model.
+1 for the US border comment, and I've been into East Germany, Russia, and similar countries. And that's not an exaggeration, the US border experience is by far the worst of any country I've ever been to.
Also one day you'd walk in and none of the displays or controls would be the same any more and you'd have experienced your first UI refresh of many more to come.
(Rotte was a formation of fighters, making up a Schwarm, and then a Staffel, the standard unit of fighters during WWII).
This is why you use JLPCB or PCBWay for your defense needs rather than pocket-lining government trough-feeders.
Having said that, I'm not sure there's much chance of it being adopted. Crypto people really want to have all the complexity all the time, which this is the exact opposite of. I mean, do you really need a custom AVX2-accelerated SHA256 implementation so you can generate a 128-bit random value? Or all of SHA256 and SHA3 and cSHAKE and SHA512? This is what makes WireGuard so secure, there's only one mode and that's secure-by-default.