521 karma · joined November 15, 2018
Clearly you were their most important customer, eh?
I agree with your general sentiment (more recognition and treatment of mental illness is a good thing), but this line troubles me. Most of what happens in my family should stay in my family. Our business is our business. It's no one else's business. There's nothing absurd about this. There may be exceptions (and a child with severe, untreated mental illness may be an exception), but like all exceptions, they are special cases, not the norm. Let's not do away with all privacy in a rush to "turn the tide"...
But this is coming from somebody who really would like to embrace better privacy...sigh...
Holding out hope for the DuckDuckGo browser on Windows. The current beta is decent, but extensions are yet to come, which means no ad blocking at the moment. That makes it essentially unusable with today's internet
$connected = $false
while($true)
{
if (-not $connected)
{
$connected = Test-Connection www.google.com -Quiet
}
else
{
Write-Host "Connected"
[console]::beep(1000, 500)
}
Start-Sleep -Seconds 2
}https://anthonyhobday.com/sideprojects/saferules/
EDIT: To be clear, not the author. Just found this on HN at some point
[0] https://www.waterfurnace.com/residential/products/geothermal...
The disagreement is essentially about the best way to achieve equality, which though a nebulous term is accepted as a goal without debate, even though the definition of the term can be widely different, as in this case. The conversatives argue that we can only achieve equality by being colorblind. The progressives argue that we can only achieve equality by consciously addressing inequality.
I see some merit on both sides. I tend to lean toward the conservative view, but I recognize moments in our history where active intervention was both noble and necessary (desegregating schools, for example). The question is whether those actions were special cases or are examples for us to follow going forward.
Lotus flower,
Out of the mud,
Stands above the water.
She is the symbol of pure beauty,
Rising from the mire of the world.
She is a reminder that even in the darkest of times,
There is always hope for beauty and renewal.
Lotus flower,
Open your petals to the sun,
And let your fragrance fill the air.
Let us all learn from your example,
And rise from the mud of our lives,
To find our true beauty.
Edit: Bard also taught me how to post this here with proper formatting, after a couple of errorsI'm not a huge fan of Facebook (been off the platform since 2012), but these are great ideas, especially the last one. It's refreshing in the midst of all the doom.
Do you have a good source for this? I'm genuinely curious. I've heard about the opioid crisis and Purdue Pharma but not this particular family. I see that they were on the board of Purdue. How were they directly connected to the deaths?
https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/presidential-speeche...
"We may work slowly, but our products are bad."
Nobody laughed, so he added, "You don't think that's funny today, but in five years you'll think it's hilarious."
Can confirm, I think it's hilarious.
In fact, it's not scientific, and that's why I consider it valuable. It can see things that science misses.
Science is often the best method we have, but it's far from infallible. And the idea that there must be a total disconnect between science and mysticism is simply false. Many of the best scientists have had a mystical bent (Einstein, Newton, Bacon).
Their argument is that subluxations (misalignment of the vertebrae) impair nerve function, kind of like having a kink in a hose. Misaligned vertebrae press on nerves and make them less able to deliver signals from the brain. Those signals trigger healing, so by relieving the pressure, the body becomes more able to heal itself.
No, really. It's a cycle.
Care to elaborate on this? I was with you right up to the end. In what ways does Slack provide a sense of agency? I feel this might be true in my experience too. Is it because it allows for quicker feedback and validation?
Edit: Nevermind, found one myself:
I think you just described the Borg from Star Trek
I feel this same way about two rules at my college that prohibited (1) building an igloo and sleeping in it, and (2) rappelling from the windows of residence halls.
I have no formal connection to them, just a very satisfied customer.
They also pushed for customers to not use personal checks for anything (at one time they didn't even offer them), which I now find kind of foolish. So after they ended the check-by-mail service, there was no way for me to get a check to my landlord. And it was just kind of a big middle finger to someone who had been a loyal customer.
I guess in the days after the Great Recession we were all hoping for some kind of financial revolution that never came. Simple closing today seems to certify that those hopes are gone.