684 karma · joined February 10, 2010
pookleblinky on FreeNode ( #[xmonad|lisp|zsh|emacs|conkeror|haskell|scheme|uzb|ruby|lojban|polyphasers])
I have Woz's complete inability to comprehend business, without his skill.
I am a man of little wealth, poor taste, and a huge .emacs. Furthermore, I am so depraved that I don't see anything wrong with this state of affairs.
I think any purported attempt to teach programming which does not end with the student creating a non-trivial, cool app, is a shame. What went wrong between SICP and current (non-Hartl/Shaw) beginning texts?
https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/kokmfemecmlekdnj...
https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/nddlgphciklkobcj...
I recommend learning a language or 5. Ocaml, Erlang, Lojban, Japanese, Quenya, etc. Use Mnemosyne and Smart.fm for quick, cumulative study sessions, translate webcomics and such, play golf with old programs in new and differently powerful languages.
Also, read more. You'd be amazed at how many great SF novels you can read in a year, or how quickly you can devour Misner's Gravitation at a few pages a day.
I think the overwhelming point of all this advice is to have fun. Do things that induce flow.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discordian_calendar
Hail Eris!
I'm sure someone here would absolutely love to work with your "co-founder". Hell, they may even give him some common human dignity as well as an interesting project.
"I am not going to tell you that quantum mechanics is weird, bizarre, confusing, or alien. QM is counterintuitive, but that is a problem with your intuitions, not a problem with quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics has been around for billions of years before the Sun coalesced from interstellar hydrogen. Quantum mechanics was here before you were, and if you have a problem with that, you are the one who needs to change. QM sure won't. There are no surprising facts, only models that are surprised by facts; and if a model is surprised by the facts, it is no credit to that model."
It would be interesting to see this combined with a project management system. I imagine being able to snap your whiteboard, have the image cleaned, and placed right onto a project wiki, in one move (similar to Posterous, perhaps).
I propose a reverse boycott: pirate the hell out of the artists you like, and donate directly to them what you think they deserve. Directly, as in skipping all the middlemen eager to take a cut of their pay and your freedom.
I had to fix that for you. That right there is the Sarcasm Mark.
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Irony_punctua...
Because it is often difficult to identify satire nowadays.
This is definitely one of the least thought out proposals I've heard in a while. At least when it gets completely subverted, it will only embarrass those responsible rather than introducing catastrophic data loss as with the proposed Internet Kill Switch.
[flick switch] "FUCK... YOU... FUCK... YOU"
The top site, http://www.rentpixelads.com/en/ , is a placeholder. As are quite a few.
Does he do A/B testing?
If you don't find this incredibly fascinating and inspiring, you're in the wrong business. Hell, the wrong world-line.
Cory Doctorow welcomes you to his capital-F Future.
The only gripe I still have with it is every single time I type ls -alx
Check out, if you haven't, http://mkweb.bcgsc.ca/carpalx/
http://mkweb.bcgsc.ca/carpalx/?worst_layout is indeed the stuff of nightmares.
Looks like you've been beat, mate.
Considering the difficulty of patching security holes in proprietary software versus patching holes in open software, Google indeed would hugely benefit by drastically reducing the difference between the cost of defense and the cost of cracking.
It's not so much levelling the playing field, as removing Harrison Bergeron's buckshot-filled equality harness.
I just started my own similar project: One Month Codebase http://zipwith.blogspot.com/search/label/one%20month%20codeb...
The idea for my project is to focus exclusively on a single codebase to study, experiment with, and contribute to, each month. And write it up in such a way that those who haven't yet gotten the courage to jump in, can try their own hand at contributing to OSS.
It reminds me of daf yomi in studying talmud, "a page a day".
A page a day is barely a burden, yet in 3 years you can have thoroughly read Misner's Gravitation, Programming Erlang 3 times over, and any number of grad-level textbooks. In 1 year, you will have read a good-sized textbook at almost no perceptible time cost, and with very high comprehension.
If he can give this a 43things style UI with publicly stated goals, integrate it with book lists and codebase repos worked on, it could be amazing.
EDIT: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.google.com&...
I suppose we should by this logic be 4 times more confident in Diaspora than Google, and 15 times more confident than HN.
http://lesswrong.com/lw/va/measuring_optimization_power/
Eliezer Yudkowsky described this pretty well.
I don't know whether this is serious, trolling, or a damn good sense of humor.
A day where X people fork, make at least one contribution, and request a pull.
Set up a cool site targetting people who are interested in coding, but haven't yet gotten the courage to contribute, and you could have something.
You'd be surprised how powerful the urge to live, despite daily I-can't-take-this-anymore frustrations, is when you've got a child's life to look forward to.